GNU bug report logs - #29196
upstreaming of reproducibility related patches

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>

Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 17:18:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
To: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
Cc: 29196 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#29196: upstreaming of reproducibility related patches
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 19:08:21 +0100
ng0 writes:

> as I wrote in #29135, we should upstream the patches we
> gather for reproducibility. Share with upstream what is
> applicable to more software than just Guix included
> definitions of the software etc.

> We have no list for this so far
> We need to share this, to avoid duplicate work elsewhere.

What about the reproducible builds list?

    https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/listinfo/rb-general
    General discussions about reproducible builds <rb-general <at> lists.reproducible-builds.org>

At the reproducible-builds summit last week in Berlin some work has been
done on the topic of upstreaming patches.  I think some effort has gone
(is going?) into a email template that starts by explaining what
reproducible-builds is, why it is important and why upstream should
consider taking the patch.

Greetings,
janneke

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 243 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.