GNU bug report logs -
#29196
upstreaming of reproducibility related patches
Previous Next
Reported by: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 17:18:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: notabug
Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
ng0 writes:
> as I wrote in #29135, we should upstream the patches we
> gather for reproducibility. Share with upstream what is
> applicable to more software than just Guix included
> definitions of the software etc.
> We have no list for this so far
> We need to share this, to avoid duplicate work elsewhere.
What about the reproducible builds list?
https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/listinfo/rb-general
General discussions about reproducible builds <rb-general <at> lists.reproducible-builds.org>
At the reproducible-builds summit last week in Berlin some work has been
done on the topic of upstreaming patches. I think some effort has gone
(is going?) into a email template that starts by explaining what
reproducible-builds is, why it is important and why upstream should
consider taking the patch.
Greetings,
janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 243 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.