GNU bug report logs - #29184
binutils 2.29 fails to set RUNPATH in gcc-cross-boot0

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>

Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 22:08:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: 29184 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#29184: binutils 2.29 fails to set RUNPATH in gcc-cross-boot0
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 11:39:47 +0100
Hi!

Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> skribis:

> I tried to cherry-pick the binutils 2.29 update
> (b0a14e5628eb56052f0c3d21a7b5375f5813b01d), but it breaks the
> 'validate-runpath' phase of gcc-cross-boot0:
>
> starting phase `validate-runpath'
> validating RUNPATH of 8 binaries in "/gnu/store/ybh1ifgzs717mz5dp1pk2nrgakqg1l8x-gcc-cross-boot0-5.5.0/libexec"...
> /gnu/store/ybh1ifgzs717mz5dp1pk2nrgakqg1l8x-gcc-cross-boot0-5.5.0/libexec/gcc/x86_64-guix-linux-gnu/5.5.0/cc1: error: depends on 'ld-linux-x86-64.so.2', which cannot be found in RUNPATH ()          

Oh, it looks like this new Binutils adds ld-linux.so to NEEDED, which
was not the case until now.

I’ve looked at NEWS files but I don’t see where this is coming from.

Could it be a problem on our side?

BTW 2.29.1 is out.

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 127 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.