From unknown Thu Aug 21 12:10:37 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#29177 <29177@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#29177 <29177@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Hidden packages are not accounted for by `guix refresh` Reply-To: bug#29177 <29177@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 19:10:37 +0000 retitle 29177 Hidden packages are not accounted for by `guix refresh` reassign 29177 guix submitter 29177 Marius Bakke severity 29177 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 06 15:47:38 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2017 20:47:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54643 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBoJ0-0006pf-I0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:47:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38663) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBoIz-0006pR-6u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:47:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBoIt-0006HW-6V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:47:32 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:43061) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBoIt-0006HS-2o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:47:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57853) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBoIr-0005VN-Vw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:47:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBoIo-0006Dp-0s for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:47:30 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:40697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBoIn-0006Ch-L4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:47:25 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A310720BD4 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 15:47:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:47:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=UtvPzqyJE8GpxqB8K N9dCwtbmS7P4KSejyW7kBNeqBg=; b=4JJjJh+YzDIM3DwYPbKgqUlMK/Ke3JL6+ l6HCw1ZlESSgBrRvplkUiZmx5T9ED3AbNTquEAtDBxLZQEc+oj0KykGaomobGfBu kt/4NNqFweKtp+GY9ulUfp9t8++x2s0rZZ2JQGOsbi0jJtiRi1TW3Vu1IWAqEO4q ORpOyGIXkPck4mmeM4R9yXzdQeUxFIfv7abHG1c+r5fpcYEKa/Byr+hGY40fv+dw 9p4CAAv52enfw94PPcKLUPmcCOyFGA15yOZcrw7v1DjiOd97jKepQd+KKwo2fhui aIlZVs1mKGvZRg15mWlTHlrBrNyw5IqspZji1SkC/PAJ7qlGL3aPQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=UtvPzqyJE8GpxqB8KN9dCwtbmS7P4KSejyW7kBNeqBg=; b=CGjTrMeC /2NRZxRxPa8HLVa1yphmcMHhHuGhXJQrVbWHnD1WRgRFFQe+3HtoA1MjYf86L9XS J2oluy3a2+3nZ1OneI6G3k9WfDy8fbhnVqfmV+6Qf/+uSNsvjQq+2fKtrQWzd4Pj C+uN1nYMY8zDzaEkFCIORq5eDYno0Wp/7BXn3GwYsdwM1LB1FI8VAvdHAURW8uiG QFAcILmmYjIz0+ZLarqsjmcpKyObaUuu+8piNCO1tfepMa1qRj8BbxX29VYwY8Lp m6ylm+VZ6DKUbYTQbLrHi1Pg2xERyGdEl8AjFAZNVHFbuYXDJNsT+ilDgrBmcMI1 9nmuwk8K9LjADQ== X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (cm-84.214.173.174.getinternet.no [84.214.173.174]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 104A97FAD3 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 15:47:22 -0500 (EST) From: Marius Bakke To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Hidden packages are not accounted for by `guix refresh` User-Agent: Notmuch/0.25.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 21:47:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87h8u73zja.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Currently, some packages are marked as "hidden". This makes `guix refresh` fail to realize the full impact of a change. Most notably this affects 'xorg-server': there have already been a few commits that rebuilds the for-test variant (and thus GTK) because they seemed to only cause ~150 rebuilds, where in reality it's more than 400: 97ecd75e289d96a8b4f9b1ae877d9d1a2f6774b4 gnu: libxfont: Fix CVE-2017-13720, CVE-2017-13722. c2eb8cd98c82277e851eb4302b7f12614e215a76 gnu: xorg-server: Build reproducibly. 9371600ec8397ab3d596dea89c388b4acb1c2437 gnu: libxres: Update to 1.2.0. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAloAylkACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPo8kwf/aNbRID6dly+dYf5lYVM6Q+tQ4/BqM+iQRPk91TzhvRWeM769vxJJj1zF YuZT7XWg5Vq/Z8pMmtYmJx1QnJOD6DNXjyhS2xvVgc7M6w+/9xISDHmBMLtWaNiF cV1B6fC89rMj/Qg1LCFNSJrWL39uUsgKcHCKJqBiOeGGGE6q8OO+LFkfwzq5QV6c t1YhoMFFYLHnDqoZaI9QcRiY0nnFEAmVLtOtYJZaILA57RKUCAyyZKpJ/vmDUhY3 e8tXbYV/U0jy89vQ1Kn7Hnij5KRSIo2LT5JZqWKPNMexSOmJqmiQEqEZhbkywfsT VtUmxiuc/CG1z5UtY+rdi8ghsZCthA== =o0+o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 06 17:16:54 2017 Received: (at 29177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2017 22:16:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54771 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBphN-0002b1-N8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 17:16:53 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:35725) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBphL-0002YL-Vs for 29177@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 17:16:52 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFB9EE7C; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 23:16:52 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T4Uw2wbQxZE1; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 23:16:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A71FB46D1; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 23:16:49 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: bug#29177: Hidden packages are not accounted for by `guix refresh` References: <87h8u73zja.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 23:16:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h8u73zja.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Mon, 06 Nov 2017 21:47:21 +0100") Message-ID: <87zi7zm4s1.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29177 Cc: 29177@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hi Marius, Marius Bakke skribis: > Currently, some packages are marked as "hidden". This makes `guix > refresh` fail to realize the full impact of a change. Most notably this > affects 'xorg-server': there have already been a few commits that > rebuilds the for-test variant (and thus GTK) because they seemed to only > cause ~150 rebuilds, where in reality it's more than 400: > > 97ecd75e289d96a8b4f9b1ae877d9d1a2f6774b4 gnu: libxfont: Fix CVE-2017-1372= 0, CVE-2017-13722. > c2eb8cd98c82277e851eb4302b7f12614e215a76 gnu: xorg-server: Build reproduc= ibly. > 9371600ec8397ab3d596dea89c388b4acb1c2437 gnu: libxres: Update to 1.2.0. Oooops! I=E2=80=99m the guilty party here. The real dependency count can = be found with: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix refresh -l -e '(@ (gnu packages xorg) xorg-server-1.19.3)' xorg-serv= er Building the following 276 packages would ensure 516 dependent packages are= rebuilt: snd@17.7 ardour@5.12 =E2=80=A6 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The problem is not that =E2=80=98xorg-server-1.19.3=E2=80=99 is hidden (we = can work around it with -e), but that it inherits from =E2=80=98xorg-server=E2=80=99= , and thus ended up being rebuilt. That=E2=80=99s a =E2=80=9Cknown limitation=E2=80=9D of =E2=80=98guix refres= h -l=E2=80=99 and not something easily addressed since inheritance is purely syntactic. Tricky! So I think it=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Cnot a bug=E2=80=9D from the =E2=80=98guix = refresh=E2=80=99 viewpoint, but it=E2=80=99s definitely a mistake on my side. Apologies! I think at this stage it=E2=80=99s no longer useful to revert this commit though. WDYT? Thanks for the heads-up! Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 06 18:14:55 2017 Received: (at 29177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2017 23:14:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54860 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBqbX-00067J-Gc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 18:14:55 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:35884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBqbV-00067A-8s for 29177@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 18:14:53 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C41F657; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 00:14:54 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d_crA_PSLmS5; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 00:14:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD5EEF656; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 00:14:52 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: bug#29177: Hidden packages are not accounted for by `guix refresh` References: <87h8u73zja.fsf@fastmail.com> <87zi7zm4s1.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:14:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87zi7zm4s1.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 06 Nov 2017 23:16:46 +0100") Message-ID: <87y3njknit.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29177 Cc: 29177@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > The problem is not that =E2=80=98xorg-server-1.19.3=E2=80=99 is hidden (w= e can work > around it with -e), but that it inherits from =E2=80=98xorg-server=E2=80= =99, and thus > ended up being rebuilt. Nevertheless, commit 8e57e416c0a6431a14d487ff8b69dece76d37c03 makes sure =E2=80=98guix refresh -l=E2=80=99 accounts for hidden packages. For instance, previously it would not report the hidden =E2=80=98xorg-serve= r=E2=80=99 when running =E2=80=98guix refresh -l dri2proto=E2=80=99; it now does. I think it doesn=E2=80=99t change results significantly though. Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 07 14:09:49 2017 Received: (at 29177-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2017 19:09:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57000 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eC9Ft-0005UL-Bv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 14:09:49 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:49713) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eC9Fq-0005UC-Ov for 29177-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 14:09:48 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEF9208EF; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 14:09:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 Nov 2017 14:09:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=+SUf3yTG13wFumaKX+Su1hh0c/XhhkdDVirvmObt7d4=; b=KvCszBFl GZJ96sU9/M2fYFQHFOc5rgdF3DuC9vZlniWsaEOoqJMUEOex772wmJiNPOMqHq6x Vr1LiWg1TD/GplvN1ofa9Gdx0nNQqaiBfGmOsh7lfX8U0o5KR6SkdmO+po8nmIcC CQ2fst/dP18xPqCRNIpkbuv8mJpGLJY0pCpJeEejrLwm3+YcdrpvGai72TkZJHK3 fu8KjYUm8IQglEEsw3LGHsYClivkfPUj3oXcGKd9PxzkYwkzeKFTNzFf6FlmGO8T m7jMi1Q8wgwZ5fu0xgyCR8wMYZA92pcBFSQQtO60mBUrHK4m7HcY6lTko4BZL8ln 2lLzMGMVEDA7eg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=+SUf3yTG13wFumaKX+Su1hh0c/Xhh kdDVirvmObt7d4=; b=IJHWSRYOOEPB9qrNd9Tqsv8AmPY9qpIsFn6oTFYd1u3hQ FxcIRRkyKXGO3R2oT2d26FwBrYKM7LoRHXWZnasynELf/VnGYMD9BV/mNhdLMrmw cQO+ZfY3xdWsZOdIza66xTVDZZlh8QFoBaElntQ3R/BEGVoEIdHFGBwz+QNQa30P NMlnpBnMhHSQV0VtKYFoZ3I5teubMDLiv5b7k2vHGBFQHz+rIeZm9FKbYUqt6LaI 0UOZQ/IeTOIXdpK3MEa0cmWK2JigswgC6On94aCUXnJA00MYq6pgSBFlogu+XZqr HBviuVHt2PD99ZMzVl2aeEhl2xXNkzE9LV2sabD+w== X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (cm-84.214.173.174.getinternet.no [84.214.173.174]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ACC817F96B; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 14:09:45 -0500 (EST) From: Marius Bakke To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#29177: Hidden packages are not accounted for by `guix refresh` In-Reply-To: <87y3njknit.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h8u73zja.fsf@fastmail.com> <87zi7zm4s1.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3njknit.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.25.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 20:09:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87tvy53nyf.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29177-done Cc: 29177-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > >> The problem is not that =E2=80=98xorg-server-1.19.3=E2=80=99 is hidden (= we can work >> around it with -e), but that it inherits from =E2=80=98xorg-server=E2=80= =99, and thus >> ended up being rebuilt. > > Nevertheless, commit 8e57e416c0a6431a14d487ff8b69dece76d37c03 makes sure > =E2=80=98guix refresh -l=E2=80=99 accounts for hidden packages. > > For instance, previously it would not report the hidden =E2=80=98xorg-ser= ver=E2=80=99 > when running =E2=80=98guix refresh -l dri2proto=E2=80=99; it now does. Thanks, that was fast! Closing the bug. > I think it doesn=E2=80=99t change results significantly though. Maybe not, but at least people won't accidentally trigger a GTK rebuild and soon 'net-tools-for-tests' because `guix refresh` missed it. It would be good to reduce the inputs of these packages to the absolute minimum in order to minimize the impact. Something to think about. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAloCBPgACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpG4AgAt7mWlMeoYWLoJL2Xq7nB18w/OdWRAzx8Q4Uw8cFtGOkF+eNGVdB6L1J2 CoAiAYjQ6YX0+QwEBrJDjVYiXf2vrpsZRRZguNWqlK7m/ASJlwanrJYY25FrBP2Y p456W4/QTIKdX3yjHtnyU3fRscn9j/qfzDixHPbY9cGBqNgV8A7NvvvDGbPKu/Ey zLmUCCVqC4Yxa5flIoEjzzyJXTldW1FONZZ00GEb6oA7BOwj03aGC/ZUcRyG2WpX e8H3/4+SIBU/hJMTRoUDid9Hn1V+f2mORrC4qOlEHeBJncYVmY8715xlxXSQ6XkA 8pweNytWEKylUl/8kcE7zp4mlq4zmA== =4Zcg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Thu Aug 21 12:10:37 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 12:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator