GNU bug report logs - #29165
26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Ken Raeburn <raeburn <at> permabit.com>

Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 06:58:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed, patch

Found in versions 26.1, 26.0.90

Fixed in version 27.1

Done: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #93 received at 29165 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org, 29165 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, raeburn <at> permabit.com,
 p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: bug#29165: 26.0.90;
 can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:04:23 +0200
> From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 17:10:17 -0500
> Cc: Ken Raeburn <raeburn <at> permabit.com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org>,
> 	Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com>, 29165 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
> 	Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> 
> I probably should have got around to this before 26.0.91, but I think
> this should still go to emacs-26 because the patch makes the behaviour
> closer to what was in v25.

Is it important enough to justify one more pretest, after 26.0.91, and
delay the release by a few more weeks?  Because that's what would be
needed if we install this on the release branch.

Besides, this change was introduced more than a year ago, and we did
that in clear understanding that it changes behavior.  So "closer to
Emacs 25" doesn't sound like a convincing argument in this case,
because we gave up that similarity up front.

Your call.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 137 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.