GNU bug report logs - #29165
26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24

Previous Next

Full log

Message #19 received at 29165 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Ken Raeburn <raeburn <at> permabit.com>,
 Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com>, 29165 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#29165: 26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs
 24
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 06:40:58 -0800 (PST)

> >> We should perhaps put something about throwing error on '&option &rest'
> >> into NEWS though.
> >
> > I don't understand.  In Common Lisp it is perfectly correct
> > to use both &optional and &rest.
> 
> What's rejected is (&optional &rest other-vars), whereas (&optional
> var1 &rest other-vars) is okay. Does CL accept the first form (and if
> yes, what does it mean)? I couldn't tell from the page you linked to.

CL accepts a single variable after &rest. And there must be
a variable after &optional.  (&optional foo &rest bar) is OK.

(&optional &rest foo) is not OK.
(&optional foo &rest bar toto titi) is not OK.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.