GNU bug report logs - #29157
25.3; Eshell parsing fails sometimes, e.g. "date" and "sed"

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Pierre Neidhardt <ambrevar <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 11:38:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 25.3

Fixed in version 27.1

Done: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #80 received at 29157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: "John Wiegley" <johnw <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 29157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ambrevar <at> gmail.com, npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: bug#29157: 25.3;
 Eshell parsing fails sometimes, e.g. "date" and "sed"
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:35:44 +0200
> From: "John Wiegley" <johnw <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>,  29157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  ambrevar <at> gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 19:21:49 -0800
> 
> >>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> EZ> That's one way of looking at Eshell, although it's not my way. Eshell was
> EZ> intended to be used from Lisp programs, and that's why its built-ins
> EZ> accept Lisp objects, values, and expressions as arguments.
> 
> Eshell was intended to be a UNIX-like environment on non-UNIX systems, and as
> a bonus to provide useful interactions with Lisp. It wasn't built first as a
> Lisp interaction mode.

Well, maybe historically I'm wrong, but factually I'm right: what we
have now is a shell that can act on Lisp objects and Lisp expressions,
and this fact is even documented in the manual.  I personally find
this feature useful and a lot of fun, and I think it would be a pity
to lose it.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 159 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.