GNU bug report logs - #29150
26.0.90; Input decoding is sometimes skipped in TTY (xterm-mouse-mode)

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Alex <agrambot <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 07:43:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Found in version 26.0.90

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #26 received at 29150 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Alex <agrambot <at> gmail.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>
Cc: Olaf Rogalsky <olaf.rogalsky <at> t-online.de>, 29150 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#29150: Fwd: 26.0.90;
 Input decoding is sometimes skipped in TTY (xterm-mouse-mode)
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:26:44 -0600
Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:

> I'm not sure why, or what it would say.  `read-key` is a reasonably good
> replacement for `read-event`, but it's still pretty brittle.
> The better solution is to not "read" anything and let the main loop do
> it for you (which is why I changed mouse-drag-track to use
> set-transient-map instead of mucking with `read-event` or `read-key`).

Assuming that no one ports evil-mode's code or updates the code in
`mouse-drag-secondary' (there's already a FIXME for this there), is
using `read-key' inside of `track-mouse' an acceptable stopgap solution?
Is it brittle enough to not apply the change to emacs-26?

> In my experience, most uses of `read-event` are (latent) bugs, so maybe
> it's in read-event's docstring that we should say something.

That sounds like a good idea.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 70 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.