GNU bug report logs -
#2910
23.0.60; Shell-script coloring bug
Previous Next
Reported by: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 22:00:02 UTC
Severity: minor
Tags: confirmed, patch
Merged with 21244,
26217,
30170,
46093,
48193
Found in versions 25.0.95, 25.2
Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Glenn Morris wrote:
>
> The discussion at
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2009-04/msg00040.html
>
> would indicate this was just a "typo" in the online posix docs.
> Is any change in Emacs needed?
If you read the thread again, you'll see that there's no disagreement
between me and the others over what the correct syntax is, just a
disagreement over whether the POSIX document does in fact represent it.
Emacs is definitely getting the coloring wrong.
As Eric Blake says:
Which means the POSIX-mandated syntax should really be represented as:
for name [in [word...] ;] do
compound-list
done
which neatly demonstrates both the points I raised in my bug report.
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | robber, n. a candid man of affairs (Bierce)
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 222 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.