From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 30 16:34:24 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2017 20:34:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42720 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e9GlM-0007d1-6E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:34:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49965) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e9GlK-0007cj-Do for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:34:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9GlE-0002X4-9D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:34:17 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:56876) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9GlE-0002Wx-4S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:34:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9GlC-0003bw-U9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:34:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9Gl9-0002VW-Pw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:34:14 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::234]:47651) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9Gl9-0002VE-Km for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:34:11 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-x234.google.com with SMTP id z50so18115166qtj.4 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 13:34:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Xk3Nm/SjSRaDEtfkQASyyqrglEASRY8UGekfr91eIos=; b=bW/W1tDo1juCEjIwdzoK29MJpy4obOngaZ4cF+4ynUVIx6cjaQP/R513vr/K7vi2rt 3sBvmtuJ+BqLopmlNi667eQwG5WhySuuxhBiuuUhoZEG/jRNW/tmD6ObOCxObAzqQvsx L0C+CkBaM7hVUJaglzc6+CbVN1aU+JZd+vvLtZ5jKKosLzN4WT3pcokop3NNxn1D02fz GQofTdd7W6hHZA9Wy0POX5urZCo0tUQtiWZnaKL7AzTJdmdsVegRLv5zsfZMJ94OpIQl 9qY1y1op8Al4B+neMhY0JWurEQuH66FCCUHrFXFa8mRwgslBTwhZCW8GLfo3liL3ofoB 7JHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=Xk3Nm/SjSRaDEtfkQASyyqrglEASRY8UGekfr91eIos=; b=Zto+vxo468Kt59rT2/ypzbg5gzA/vfFuklw3wiivfWoPp/l5dBV5+YtXEcnGm4D3TF Y4JOceXwxqFQFSjwk4p9UJbgID95CoSkQdE33fs3xttF0+QxIckQQ3TCZKhuw7Jh2uaM aGZM1akWL9PIgHpuadS6Y73UbidVplOisi4I1F5A56kbtRCtGPCyQZoOQjzLiSuoHZk9 Q3sg4bqc2SmiS/4/B2X9Wgfn4qmW/DwJK+2PdAltUbfgjX/x1NZ01/224phwKq+TfeyA s1YfzY4illonY34Rern/q/idjvIkL6ICHG2eo91K1fKsaECFLlA8fkf6bEdLNfA/+biZ zVag== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVpuSlCoc175rlz/IBywAfFXg3WPJJBjbo+yfPx65u1j7gT9mSZ ctTHii3083ynjZpmLFYwrsdimA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+ROeY88T+zSisiHTxmCF1NhAaOuAnboQNieCy7ZxWUfpuuBLhn4Yh1v4NlEjmGVdmMtEV4ZdA== X-Received: by 10.200.56.124 with SMTP id r57mr16807939qtb.310.1509395650563; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 13:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from g1 (c-73-167-118-254.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.118.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c69sm9936401qkb.65.2017.10.30.13.34.08 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 13:34:09 -0700 (PDT) From: myglc2 To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: guix system: error: qemu-CVE-2017-7493.patch: patch not found Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:34:08 -0400 Message-ID: <86fua04bpb.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain After a clean guix make, guix system build produced this error ... root@g1 ~/con/15# guix system --cores=4 --max-jobs=4 -K --on-error=debug build sys.scm guix system: error: qemu-CVE-2017-7493.patch: patch not found VERSION INFO: root@g1 ~/con/15# guix --version guix (GNU Guix) 0.13.0.4202-1f6f4 Copyright (C) 2017 the Guix authors License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. root@g1 ~/con/15# stat ~/.config/guix/latest | grep File: File: /root/.config/guix/latest -> /home/g1/src/guix/ root@g1 ~/con/15# git -C ~/.config/guix/latest describe v0.13.0-4202-g1f6f4c40c root@g1 ~/con/15# git -C ~/.config/guix/latest log -n 1 --oneline 1f6f4c40c (HEAD -> o-master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) gnu: Add r-tgconfig. root@g1 ~/con/15# git -C /home/g1/src/guix branch -av | grep '*' * o-master 1f6f4c40c gnu: Add r-tgconfig. SYS CONFIG: --=-=-= Content-Type: application/octet-stream Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=sys.scm Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Ozs7IEd1aXhTRCBoZWFkbGVzcyBzZXJ2ZXIKKHVzZS1tb2R1bGVzIChnbnUpKQoodXNlLXNlcnZp Y2UtbW9kdWxlcyBuZXR3b3JraW5nIHNzaCkKKHVzZS1wYWNrYWdlLW1vZHVsZXMKIGFkbWluCiBi YXNlCiBjZXJ0cwogY3VwcwogZGlzawogZW1hY3MKIGZyZWVpcG1pCiBsaW51eAogcWVtdQogcnN5 bmMKIHNjcmVlbgogc3NoCiB2ZXJzaW9uLWNvbnRyb2wKIHdnZXQKIHhvcmcgCiApCihvcGVyYXRp bmctc3lzdGVtCiAgKGhvc3QtbmFtZSAiZzEiKQogICh0aW1lem9uZSAiQW1lcmljYS9OZXdfWW9y ayIpCiAgKGxvY2FsZSAiZW5fVVMudXRmOCIpCiAgKGtlcm5lbC1hcmd1bWVudHMgJygiY29uc29s ZT10dHlTMSwxMTUyMDAiKSkKICA7OyBSQUlEMSByb290IHVzaW5nIDEgTlZNZSBTU0QgKyAyIEhE cwogIChib290bG9hZGVyIChncnViLWNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24gKHRhcmdldCAiL2Rldi9udm1lMG4x IikKCQkJCSAgKHRlcm1pbmFsLW91dHB1dHMgJyhjb25zb2xlKSkKCQkJCSAgKHRlcm1pbmFsLWlu cHV0cyAnKHNlcmlhbCBjb25zb2xlKSkKCQkJCSAgKHNlcmlhbC1zcGVlZCAxMTUyMDApCQkJCSAg CgkJCQkgICkpCiAgKGluaXRyZCAobGFtYmRhIChmaWxlLXN5c3RlbXMgLiByZXN0KSAoYXBwbHkg YmFzZS1pbml0cmQgZmlsZS1zeXN0ZW1zCgkJCQkJICAgICAgICM6ZXh0cmEtbW9kdWxlcyAnKCJy YWlkMSIpCgkJCQkJICAgICAgIHJlc3QpKSkKICAobWFwcGVkLWRldmljZXMgKGxpc3QgKG1hcHBl ZC1kZXZpY2UKCQkJIChzb3VyY2UgJygiL2Rldi9udm1lMG4xcDEiICIvZGV2L3NkYTEiICIvZGV2 L3NkYjEiKSkKCQkJICh0YXJnZXQgIi9kZXYvbWQzIikKCQkJICh0eXBlIHJhaWQtZGV2aWNlLW1h cHBpbmcpKSkpCiAgKGZpbGUtc3lzdGVtcyAoY29ucyAoZmlsZS1zeXN0ZW0KCQkJKHRpdGxlICdk ZXZpY2UpCgkJCShkZXZpY2UgIi9kZXYvbWQzIikKCQkJKG1vdW50LXBvaW50ICIvIikKCQkJKHR5 cGUgImV4dDQiKQoJCQkoZGVwZW5kZW5jaWVzIG1hcHBlZC1kZXZpY2VzKSkKCQkgICAgICAlYmFz ZS1maWxlLXN5c3RlbXMpKQogIChzd2FwLWRldmljZXMgJygiL2Rldi9udm1lMG4xcDIiICkpCiAg KHVzZXJzIChjb25zKiAodXNlci1hY2NvdW50IChuYW1lICJnMSIpCgkJCSAgICAgIChncm91cCAi dXNlcnMiKQoJCQkgICAgICAoc3VwcGxlbWVudGFyeS1ncm91cHMgJygid2hlZWwiICJrdm0iKSkK CQkJICAgICAgKGhvbWUtZGlyZWN0b3J5IChzdHJpbmctYXBwZW5kICIvaG9tZS8iIG5hbWUpKSkK CQkodXNlci1hY2NvdW50IChuYW1lICJhZG1pbiIpCgkJCSAgICAgIChncm91cCAidXNlcnMiKQoJ CQkgICAgICAoc3VwcGxlbWVudGFyeS1ncm91cHMgJygid2hlZWwiICJrdm0iKSkKCQkJICAgICAg KGhvbWUtZGlyZWN0b3J5IChzdHJpbmctYXBwZW5kICIvaG9tZS8iIG5hbWUpKSkKCQklYmFzZS11 c2VyLWFjY291bnRzKSkKICAocGFja2FnZXMgKGNvbnMqCgkgICAgIGN1cHMKCSAgICAgZW1hY3Mt bm8teC10b29sa2l0CgkgICAgIGVtYWNzLWd1aXgKCSAgICAgZW1hY3MtemVuYnVybi10aGVtZQoJ ICAgICBmcmVlaXBtaQoJICAgICBnaXQKCSAgICAgZ2xpYmMtdXRmOC1sb2NhbGVzCgkgICAgIGdu dS1tYWtlCgkgICAgIG1kYWRtCgkgICAgIG1hZ2l0CgkgICAgIG5zcy1jZXJ0cwoJICAgICBvcGVu c3NoCgkgICAgIHBhcnRlZAoJICAgICBxZW11CgkgICAgIHJzeW5jCgkgICAgIHNjcmVlbgoJICAg ICBzbWFydG1vbnRvb2xzCgkgICAgIHRyZWUKCSAgICAgd2dldAoJICAgICB4YXV0aAoJICAgICAl YmFzZS1wYWNrYWdlcykpCiAgKHNlcnZpY2VzIChjb25zKiAoZGhjcC1jbGllbnQtc2VydmljZSkK CQkgICAobnRwLXNlcnZpY2UpCgkJICAgKHNlcnZpY2Ugb3BlbnNzaC1zZXJ2aWNlLXR5cGUgKG9w ZW5zc2gtY29uZmlndXJhdGlvbgoJCQkJCQkgICh4MTEtZm9yd2FyZGluZz8gI3QpKSkKCQkgICAo YWdldHR5LXNlcnZpY2UgKGFnZXR0eS1jb25maWd1cmF0aW9uICh0dHkgInR0eVMxIikKCQkJCQkJ CSAoYmF1ZC1yYXRlICIxMTUyMDAiKSkpCgkJICAgJWJhc2Utc2VydmljZXMpKSkK --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 30 20:31:59 2017 Received: (at 29072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Oct 2017 00:31:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42964 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e9KTH-00070F-1I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:31:59 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:60789) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e9KTF-000705-2c for 29072@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:31:57 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C5C20B44; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:31:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:31:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=YI/8hJwMmGygQfQSVP0I1texGeXReGkTcyVlZuBJVFU=; b=gNF/a o/wcyv62GN/tQhgE+m1u9jDUSlpYZI/Xlxe+cCPoa3JEWP619lLIl85Hz8RjT9bM IvIBQ9i7hR/vm6o13jVDtYr8wrpAcgMKnuYi0gJR1QkU9yomeTzumkfPfw2R/Bvt bOBcxOdA8tBifoMDefAvppV14kHa4Odr7jubOU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=YI/8hJwMmGygQfQSVP0I1texGeXRe GkTcyVlZuBJVFU=; b=Ni2I75c0PCDOseh3AG1G7P+wnEM6HrIZLy16vPCHI7/IS kKcoEzfUWITNtE/ltIN8SDZBJsD/tZIkKTeofFqe+niJD4haeFkPRx3lDZ1xn6hY +E7eDYLeY7yjhNKog3J5bURwglGq7wBWfpkSL5qocz+13xPSrTnz0M74W8oczhM5 m3yhe5XseA6/NqwifkZEPgxY6atH5BxthmDznmY+AXYZg7JjjcXAJmYqhqJ2PDci 2aPDphQ9er2UsOi3VkNbmFCfpmkF8zSrZSaEazp/D+hhfPCgO1s6xIzGHD5fs8e2 drhNW4qbirGlZXLJsBPvQkd+dQxWxUbT0ON3ap+kQ== X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (c-73-165-108-70.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.165.108.70]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 972A67E0ED; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:31:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:31:53 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: myglc2 Subject: Re: bug#29072: guix system: error: qemu-CVE-2017-7493.patch: patch not found Message-ID: <20171031003153.GA24788@jasmine.lan> References: <86fua04bpb.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86fua04bpb.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29072 Cc: 29072@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 04:34:08PM -0400, myglc2 wrote: > After a clean guix make, guix system build produced this error ... >=20 > root@g1 ~/con/15# guix system --cores=3D4 --max-jobs=3D4 -K --on-error=3D= debug build sys.scm > guix system: error: qemu-CVE-2017-7493.patch: patch not found What about `git status`? Is the worktree in a consistent state? This patch file was removed in August 2017 [0] and nothing should refer to it anymore. [0] commit 2de7d137b3c6f528acb540a6ab3460627f484b0a --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAln3xHYACgkQJkb6MLrK fwheFRAAlb3dtMVbxu4kDZ+L3eEJzpTETUCZSSQuWXK0K6jx8GzmKY5xH207wjoU hcwseiQhDx2gNLQlU0TnDXhYfGUVD61YP/rvB6vdSOLNmXFpMmNY1Dwbd8IQPwj9 Khg79PuOghRAnagO9A7p/8Tvw40O7acnhAlTmJ0NYJaU1oocJ16aGHsnVA/aN4Mc FqFPEY/9UURVd/tB1CvTUFknWr9VXWuNPuZEWwq2dHYQbhaa29YUqgcjSe+dzUmy bjbcnddCVMDbTsLMZYqClaWCsjfg0Vs2FxMgx7DUiy9lpBIf7btrBR/9UhGXAOg2 ysfkbds1BR3FmiWZIGbTCjVomUiNBVutze344sKdzilB1H8APB1JgVzt/6Q2hBOx yBbQgwNr7gwueP5gkQBlYKue8zAYHePPjqhrauYqeB58x2FqnmhIKcmUFkpD49sd 1Oi5Xq373REJu7k1hjt1Q0wfakRVLGQI/f3z865gyhk9Ub4Gyp7w/PNEcV/JQVkq 34L44SrU1Zc1pqwngxQZMna1Q70hMv1iqAFWa7GB2ra5huEVUbzzCFuv+fyrpYCs f/CojBWJ5cpsxylExRdK+/sLuyxepXbgrnzi7H4OSHY/K2Itykc6kWSSyVR8QRbH +62JbwvkHadzH/Vci0RITEbk7VNDOXyVXk84uO5iQW+6ajBrAGg= =toQ5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 01 10:40:38 2017 Received: (at 29072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2017 14:40:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46099 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e9uC5-00077Z-Vr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 10:40:38 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]:47683) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e9uC4-00077H-F8 for 29072@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 10:40:36 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id m189so2936571qke.4 for <29072@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 07:40:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=Yymps5k0JTmJ2yZalURpQbSiqj6OyKMB/NEtBtX/l/o=; b=PcZBIlkfIiQKZFqaXY+Zn+aeS9kdwQ9yjBWNBoG8I6vHAv7q5HQzQzU6GYz2xoXsxK Zt26CX/quVuy/OB1KwnUfdM2BVX2cIdJJNDOU+dHJXQ1P3jBQYDz3mM7OPJGLrI4XLm9 wr6eYmMAUcNv7nVuBKzVi/IxKaRoYaU6ZJ+ET74FrZXQjekpK1iH8OSLVmwrVZpI/SaK BHYDnkiOwx+JF7saTefI/PYpA1PjKTVaczIOlKJ1Bc9PiP1WFhpCkBEXUeowqsSBC7UI JBTU/10/hC+RwNQTSGim3EcXeDXOumR3vVy4o8inRU8x31ceSuWaZhbtFlJYBi8LAcFI ppDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Yymps5k0JTmJ2yZalURpQbSiqj6OyKMB/NEtBtX/l/o=; b=q4ua9Mo+/LZVwcqhL0C68GyMFV3+5dL7591jlqamgvN9fSB9EC1XDXSXtCNxrer+m7 U07cUUy+EkZaWspkqItNL6XXPIzUnK3R3+XNntQb1jC+iaOyBPMcIJCaxJ8FF0uIP17/ s0sJVmoX7BDMzqSEtA3FvBRKcZ8NAvyQ7LfHXZfXfkdzt5UxD7GMWhIYuYccKbr/vokW 5OYF94WcrfZdyr9wp7DbP6J42qCz11b6F5jvAgXJWOIWrRr7uH9sSm34f3Rph4qQj+nX P7Ohf998vZrFro1KtWd0hM5H/oSnbuKbvbywLOi3+kHgjtfjjNiBKbjhXOLT4aZBdCb6 AwAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWFszlxKVwMRPw5azDlet+aJVeBhXxZ3wMJANNDdb81f1DMDnU+ EFi7vsFp3hUxiaWHqgwrNZs1Mg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QGPznByF+laMZZjYEJcnVugawKQ5xU4v815Mal+UYtXn+rRc4pzuAqBxGgVlWhRYXivffY1w== X-Received: by 10.55.197.194 with SMTP id k63mr124689qkl.208.1509547230527; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 07:40:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from g1 (c-73-167-118-254.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.118.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm527742qts.42.2017.11.01.07.40.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 Nov 2017 07:40:29 -0700 (PDT) From: myglc2 To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#29072: guix system: error: qemu-CVE-2017-7493.patch: patch not found References: <86fua04bpb.fsf@gmail.com> <20171031003153.GA24788@jasmine.lan> Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 10:40:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20171031003153.GA24788@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:31:53 -0400") Message-ID: <86y3nquko3.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29072 Cc: 29072@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) On 10/30/2017 at 20:31 Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 04:34:08PM -0400, myglc2 wrote: >> After a clean guix make, guix system build produced this error ... >> >> root@g1 ~/con/15# guix system --cores=4 --max-jobs=4 -K --on-error=debug build sys.scm >> guix system: error: qemu-CVE-2017-7493.patch: patch not found > > What about `git status`? Is the worktree in a consistent state? This > patch file was removed in August 2017 [0] and nothing should refer to it > anymore. > > [0] commit 2de7d137b3c6f528acb540a6ab3460627f484b0a Thanks Leo. git status is clean ... g1@g1 ~/src/guix$ git status On branch o-master Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'. nothing to commit, working tree clean g1@g1 ~/src/guix$ git remote -vv origin git://git.savannah.gnu.org/guix.git (fetch) origin git://git.savannah.gnu.org/guix.git (push) g1@g1 ~/src/guix$ emacs 'M-x grep find qemu-CVE-2017-7493.patch' produces ... *** -*- mode: grep; default-directory: "~/src/guix/" -*- Grep started at Wed Nov 1 10:25:46 find . -type f -exec grep --color -nH -e qemu-CVE-2017-74 Binary file ./gnu/packages/qemu.go matches ./test-tmp/store/.links/0m1wjb06m31vw9jpimbmqkwxh1fzgyxag ./test-tmp/store/.links/0zk12m0jwp2n2380pq9x56mx71ry1dv42 ./test-tmp/store/.links/0vrz62alwffjah2rj33wrwj7ypzbkv0pm ./test-tmp/store/.links/0xlcs15frjqbnhmcp2pv1ly9by84ncafn ./test-tmp/store/.links/00fiw7380k24qcq3k6pqgkz6j0c1l6ibw ./test-tmp/store/.links/066d4qpkxrf8p5vgay3x9bwn3zhzxp3gh ./test-tmp/store/.links/1z89050j89mz33c97b9bhvrb2h8972qyg ./test-tmp/store/.links/0cwv31pb892219rqgnmxzb950kd82b3mz ./test-tmp/store/.links/0bz2735f2x9f624yzmi6i3bryxsgn0qq7 ./test-tmp/store/.links/0mvrdlqf3y989djjghinvsvsa80h250xm ./test-tmp/store/h5nhfi9941i4bh02s3sijgzqcxcswxrx-qemu-2. ./test-tmp/store/44p8aj7gqd97126gsw82anvhbbq2h080-qemu-2. ./test-tmp/store/0dkhz940aq4h1s6wg2lflhxswrpw93gs-qemu-2. ./test-tmp/store/xdmnickhpv89q568jhgrlkixnc873dx9-qemu-2. ./test-tmp/store/apspl851a4lv6fn94wcgwmvlmfn3m24l-qemu-2. ./test-tmp/store/zbiwif5nw7074bwbrzv3b93mybrbqjqc-qemu-2. ./test-tmp/store/i8h6n9p0rvl1ra3s1k1pz9q7z1rnqnyc-qemu-2. ./test-tmp/store/saq5a28g1c6gybnfdd3v1lilkil7kvjf-qemu-2. ./test-tmp/store/i9g8mrrzmbyfa4k5ra3alw69jw3bynz0-qemu-2. ./test-tmp/store/0jd1jrsm3387vl7yncr6988zw7a969a3-qemu-2. Binary file ./test-tmp/db/db.sqlite matches Grep exited abnormally with code 1 at Wed Nov 1 10:25:49 *** In an attempt at self-help, I deleting ./test-tmp/* But I am still getting this error. TIA - George From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 01 11:27:47 2017 Received: (at 29072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2017 15:27:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46170 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e9uvj-0008I3-FY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:27:47 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:37039) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e9uvg-0008Ht-Qd for 29072@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:27:45 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AB020A91; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:27:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:27:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=pKbds6ctU7GQiNCv6IcKbLu9HZMEqmdZ92F/gyGcZHI=; b=CcZRW otfOqoa4PCGMB0V1ZfPYgO941pMK9sZOwXGRXExOv1s0FE/hT2Cjmj/Rveu+hi5H B83lMrX6Lt05V8/QB3bmlLNxz0wKdHj7hFAd1J+6tiWH0lgSi9HkYujATw3qQSG6 RPKwcJX85eNJvLHYODn3dnhpn3CaaBfV7WO/B4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=pKbds6ctU7GQiNCv6IcKbLu9HZMEq mdZ92F/gyGcZHI=; b=Sysv3zRNChunax+4HYus8xf4nPtC1n/3w96OI/2T9Nni4 eVNZMmuXunZ0PC5r9Ok0BtCQgaHG/GsCjJQhoi12keiF6hLD0HrVu4zArIi39lmN LkVLVBse3BPBYRoE1FfE4xsULFoRZBjdOsQr4LOkD6Bu6h6UvB4g17NSBNj4OGQb XcUfNsJBOnQuadqGsWqy+jIJ8Wvl9KdXbJewBiTrvP3/hZdHx44VcerZSWU/0pb2 W8a0iyQ/MmWWNMpNbgD3FMD4R8oJB1krLaqlfa+voJl/IOPvOGSGFPM5uibQhcwG sUaete5Tyj43V8IQJ9QSJN4gxFmUcK66cXDEN4fIQ== X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (unknown [172.58.200.206]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 454937F91E; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:27:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:27:08 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: myglc2 Subject: Re: bug#29072: guix system: error: qemu-CVE-2017-7493.patch: patch not found Message-ID: <20171101152708.GA21123@jasmine.lan> References: <86fua04bpb.fsf@gmail.com> <20171031003153.GA24788@jasmine.lan> <86y3nquko3.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86y3nquko3.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29072 Cc: 29072@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:40:28AM -0400, myglc2 wrote: > Binary file ./gnu/packages/qemu.go matches =20 Try deleting this compiled qemu.go and then try again. --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAln558gACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhvcA/+M+X3hCJazf+HcLwT9jTWvwzkLXmb+89Qmo+xW5l3LJHwLbvVL9CKxRX5 CJvk1mX0mNTfWCErEG5ABVeOnM+tHO0aJ/6mrOGk8vA8Ry/PmSyZFlVcdmytb/eW KUkMJMIuyNYUrhJL5GDl4MVP7jMtCUPE6s6ObGSFOrcHkJNEHKhtOJ/ZzX0sEaOo Zbnf0Xz/apIJ6SuG3Iz3cB/dmlRo8lEnZZ/6ie3iO/YzfWThdOmtg7Md/u89Abux 01vgiEMJl2c2RtMYULrDOWZQXcRj66aMkdVaf4dE9WC4Td1K4GznxFlTKkggB/Pk 8u6xRa2atw5I4WAI3LAIKx+o9ia9YKerPQydDg4ojaXdXgKBtXPW7GNGqUWu4y0z yjrkkJhe8byD3v7fuy/UaTZJJqL12kla2Ac7WYlaYczcEsnTsSM+qwsUeuWbEF5V eq6HBrTDj1LKsSpzruXqU002RG5G9R9bQl7aQdzH+GFKwxojReuk2f2+WBEzy7Qg /oK4RzkYjDQ7xCIuD9POeSi+XGJ06fkhdFsdpxTH+mmKQ4+qaGV1H5lMF51PZNGL /pHJ/tSmNuNohK35p52nRfFZz8SCE/FyhQ2mlmmuB/ybc+3y163oRxGJsJbfL8Jb Yzm/H/TicM1wBO1BwhIvxQ48Y75nr8oNiilNUJVh3n4Ea5ucYHY= =VkHq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 01 22:40:57 2017 Received: (at 29072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2017 02:40:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46648 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eA5RB-0000Kq-Go for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 22:40:57 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f171.google.com ([209.85.220.171]:52213) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eA5R9-0000Ke-KJ for 29072@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 22:40:55 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 17so5095226qkq.8 for <29072@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 19:40:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=EiLGb2Uze5asZJSVNSGtMw3G5oUmSzpzH5lmG32AFKI=; b=XXYWHSbMKJohxC8Kund/0bNEXO5+1C7/CIpCw4ofKbl94hHs+aoLVErKxNS0Shkauf AOaIP9tVBC4AMYWlQr70mDBXJl3BAfzy/F3myKkQpiWZ7ck+h9qeLWZlGtlzSizssQ8A 0CpEyJrlpPtt/PbLrWYMY3xPSxGMa5Fdl5ca1u3q6D4oATQ0JKbehsow0n8a8pLXAcsX SqpkWivBjqlmPh+Cz0LUqL0OsHsHX9i+yOaa2E0lv1NFCytTV80bjMBJ5h+P2qLOsDfy Kgtmd0VaL8Y7yYI5CSi/5d2lR04wLA7GfMcdgDWuRMI9a792bXrlR4ZxbDsy5F+gWUTy Hy2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=EiLGb2Uze5asZJSVNSGtMw3G5oUmSzpzH5lmG32AFKI=; b=jvLz4I9JYOL4kIQmGVFpG+pOsxq0M3cL9+NZEkGuiunL5y8gjdKz//GsqG65ITwcgC VvOsSB/SP2PDGzPkJTh7qayB2FqeanuUtM+ZfH68G7LAdyrAYm3NH1EHu515TzcDAq9p 1ygNckr2/9t/D4Wc0bBWLXH2BPkWSuCUbw8oaM6wjReUWT0uro49/4J9IXzYFfxrvaNB 0/tvkAw8C4RWDiI6sb98LYBk3jIG/34CfPrhWK61CxikPH9TTy7kpDO/DDOT/cRw9FMv 2EEN6E2XcHtrwrhIbZOOryzk06IIvZ8EI5guLex0YnbVVT3cSWx9zMygFs2RvkIDdX8t 01JQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWqLNVJWzo31ri3l68pnKQkSUiF0YhOYas+tHXfsSpYHWM0QNi3 XZIqAdJo1nHP55v5VA+SBTJDCm7F X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SwV0Ikauqg8VamwYnvJz8XhGSocuGyyPpJ9A35gJXDGrHn+BOEe8VwxzPDDEPnO3lo/8Gobw== X-Received: by 10.55.21.99 with SMTP id f96mr2929312qkh.315.1509590449831; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 19:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from g1 (c-73-167-118-254.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.118.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u65sm1415876qtd.20.2017.11.01.19.40.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 Nov 2017 19:40:48 -0700 (PDT) From: myglc2 To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#29072: guix system: error: qemu-CVE-2017-7493.patch: patch not found References: <86fua04bpb.fsf@gmail.com> <20171031003153.GA24788@jasmine.lan> <86y3nquko3.fsf@gmail.com> <20171101152708.GA21123@jasmine.lan> Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 22:40:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20171101152708.GA21123@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:27:08 -0400") Message-ID: <86shdxv1w0.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29072 Cc: 29072@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) On 11/01/2017 at 11:27 Leo Famulari writes: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:40:28AM -0400, myglc2 wrote: >> Binary file ./gnu/packages/qemu.go matches > > Try deleting this compiled qemu.go and then try again. Thank you Leo. I deleted ./gnu/packages/qemu.go and re-ran make. Make failed to regenerate ./gnu/packages/qemu.go So now I am really confused. DETAILS: g1@g1 ~/src/guix$ guix environment -e "(@ (gnu packages package-management) guix)" -M 4 -c 4 g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/home/g1/src/guix' Making all in po/guix make[2]: Entering directory '/home/g1/src/guix/po/guix' make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/g1/src/guix/po/guix' Making all in po/packages make[2]: Entering directory '/home/g1/src/guix/po/packages' make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/g1/src/guix/po/packages' make[2]: Entering directory '/home/g1/src/guix' Compiling Scheme modules... make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/g1/src/guix' make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/g1/src/guix' g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ ls -l ./gnu/packages/qemu.go ls: cannot access './gnu/packages/qemu.go': No such file or directory g1@g1 ~/src/guix$ git status On branch o-master Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'. nothing to commit, working tree clean g1@g1 ~/src/guix$ git branch -vv * o-master 1f6f4c40c [origin/master] gnu: Add r-tgconfig. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 01 22:44:47 2017 Received: (at 29072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2017 02:44:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46653 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eA5Ut-0000Qa-2y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 22:44:47 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:59623) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eA5Uq-0000QR-VI for 29072@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 22:44:45 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4630208D9; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 22:44:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Nov 2017 22:44:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=lR2t4sCO6lOVNRSHM50f4viJrL0RusMeK6wm7ac/0fE=; b=Rs6sX Fc/F1q6UFHIJnmTYNW/MbpLfeQPjnowk4S8nR/AWsJb1HsU0a8DSQSbK3QDTDncx qHyouIAaOLobuU9PQYsYM4/G7ADlcXzgajIEWFRbDWApdkIWXdHCTSkiP3+JS8tn sQg7FSOnZwJbzP/UUn6U4Jm2HxMlEtpvAsBpX4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=lR2t4sCO6lOVNRSHM50f4viJrL0Ru sMeK6wm7ac/0fE=; b=hz1bYNmCUmfaI9R33FDo9Xv5x0E6xLkXS+lXMHpNq/3zm V82Rih9LkPCDexoDIwTHm3NGvnipO3VsOy2oMfx6lzSFiOaTTqooLfQD+GmW7/su aUIcFT2Wa6QhLKzJBxaOE1iB+MVcAMwx2XLhvyguYWstbyO8/RHGr980O/kqRBma Uhdh+AZyx0otHIRkmnNPbcgq0Ky2KF1+RoogJmRhUeAysqnNuGHb2kCXJ4Lfw584 QN4acI/b7xqfNfNSuq7gHCQsUs3pK2TNYAMwqOD6YwykqAXtaf3ZdcXdeR41hvMq w38ILHWHSIJFs7snbF0qMGNxGeySMcQw2cM2Hataw== X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (c-73-165-108-70.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.165.108.70]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A9AA17F8DF; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 22:44:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 22:44:40 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: myglc2 Subject: Re: bug#29072: guix system: error: qemu-CVE-2017-7493.patch: patch not found Message-ID: <20171102024440.GA17609@jasmine.lan> References: <86fua04bpb.fsf@gmail.com> <20171031003153.GA24788@jasmine.lan> <86y3nquko3.fsf@gmail.com> <20171101152708.GA21123@jasmine.lan> <86shdxv1w0.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86shdxv1w0.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29072 Cc: 29072@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:40:47PM -0400, myglc2 wrote: > On 11/01/2017 at 11:27 Leo Famulari writes: >=20 > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:40:28AM -0400, myglc2 wrote: > >> Binary file ./gnu/packages/qemu.go matches =20 > > > > Try deleting this compiled qemu.go and then try again. >=20 > Thank you Leo. >=20 > I deleted ./gnu/packages/qemu.go and re-ran make. >=20 > Make failed to regenerate ./gnu/packages/qemu.go >=20 > So now I am really confused. The 'gnu/packages/qemu.scm' file was removed from Guix in July 2017, with commit 59132b800093e486e4d81aed6b837e9ac76aa86c. The QEMU packages were moved into 'gnu/packages/virtualization.scm'. I'm not an Autotools expert, but in cases like this I usually try `make clean && ./configure --localstatedir=3D/var && make`. Did you try something like that yet? --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAln6hpQACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiBGhAAjX3/ZP1BgBL0sT8ZRWQz0+L2B+P3bUMrWlYvpSQRspNP2Bq0hqAOM25y JIFT7k6UBulyuHdzut1rzdu0X7N6iO49C4GYg5b/dSTMCOwfml6R7RIa8eQ6coOE 1Uq7yrWJd+bESmeLm04XDCkCJvfEmNC9u+C7G2K460ls0Uc7Rd7fF4xGiIxpTh9f UantJa2BevBca435GyC0pXG1+F8ukhWQLU979ATDKYJbrOTIk2s9mGDJc1/u9+l6 KAMTZiq6qZzi3e3PNG46K9tPZl2U7L0uQFPG/+nhvOb0gPWr8E9qUOsjHnMPwODI hnv02JUg5hnYHavgzikIR5CcgLxEoFZ0GaYuuMAHjp4T30fWTUxBf2QKmLfaoi9/ O7JquuT6uDAjvztXLH5l4hDkq24HLdQ2/JL3vq6On6kxIDf7KDDBk3WIIQbqix1q OClmdjFsW4IHud2QXu5dXNjGRJStaU/cgVZeWYrin1/lTrxjAQqPkM2J7fnJxIdC ZQAd8jYR/ZGt6aNqGDNKXIKWIqVqWrbg9McJ12l1gk8A8wA9FLHuDJ/oPwbF0qQs 3vUYq/vGRJ67DzGgk+z0rf5Sgu+mcZV3fVBgRWwykyhCJKabAMe2y2EPQ63EEfVf G3AeMGMJNZNTFt1DfCOxzJPcKqc1IOSxcIIS9jNq77epEYeENoQ= =Fwyx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 04 19:50:20 2017 Received: (at 29072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2017 23:50:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51054 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eB8Ci-0004zr-JN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2017 19:50:20 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173]:48342) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eB8Cg-0004ze-Pv for 29072@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2017 19:50:19 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-f173.google.com with SMTP id f8so7199814qta.5 for <29072@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 04 Nov 2017 16:50:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=OqcxBxi/xPvyMu81+UPQd7cLJH8HC3JIqnLLrOr1HnU=; b=EqCYGyT+CBTXY7EhG1lHcuBIBXtVZCSUXWX+BCkxQgMihtvhy99+xQNIFXOsZ58kBS +HRrtseEB8ss06NB7RgjHgtgPWtU25YxIrwvGBB3bCqJdlW+6I2jisW7X8uyIbALBZoU gHP5dChfCcYwy4HSOgEY3Gr/YmhMeSaCOnAXZIEVTfsxnqOcBTGhV4+ucQyXkaTG6KuL Fsi6EC0KO1YsLav/PpqbkaVvaLqLrXM2QuaNHMl6MxfSAdz+ynkj8mGf2h9vhkoSfrbA Qt+gf75VRGGEgVCqVao2a7N0ZTvco4fQRH58E1iojgYs/3S1YIC+0D4GlS5pxIdo2r+V IcgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=OqcxBxi/xPvyMu81+UPQd7cLJH8HC3JIqnLLrOr1HnU=; b=elhqMhUsH8UrhPbYN76DJ6H9MlhyXuOaqGqEEALhSQ1CWV6GJnZNlX6xGbAXpErxso whZ6/8GwtjlWU/zNkjPKhD/UmAC7q1fqpJ7dvQh+yepyvSaeiExwx2fCS8ZmsTQ/7dcs 6q2mNQdMFVNxt32YjuX5a9aU0SvqSb9h3pXlT8OVA8gxyEiQVREbQAbptn+Z9vf+ng5c roM1MoHY8zBk0b7VIJUKiZVFANe4fM6cfJZmJOBfcCMs0KVEPMbjWzaxCNhEYNLkrUza 635YFFp1keVMtWsLAv6qD/JQm2rW8Q72j8Y+kdFPtBDfvl96fMJl3yn/VpvG5HfyCF2B Um+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7qPic4BW1EEueUl065cBcLfdxdlA6erR049ltf8hrRVVI8gu+c M+stasBXcU44HiGtAIj1h4kKwg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TZqvaDumwovDPbkusHmptnIUZ/wXjn46OkSS636NdoEAXKWSf6MN/VhV2dyrQhAz7BBYSnNw== X-Received: by 10.200.15.250 with SMTP id f55mr16493275qtk.249.1509839412776; Sat, 04 Nov 2017 16:50:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from g1 (c-73-167-118-254.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.118.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b10sm6158900qtg.2.2017.11.04.16.50.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 04 Nov 2017 16:50:11 -0700 (PDT) From: myglc2 To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#29072: guix system: error: qemu-CVE-2017-7493.patch: patch not found References: <86fua04bpb.fsf@gmail.com> <20171031003153.GA24788@jasmine.lan> <86y3nquko3.fsf@gmail.com> <20171101152708.GA21123@jasmine.lan> <86shdxv1w0.fsf@gmail.com> <20171102024440.GA17609@jasmine.lan> Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2017 19:50:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20171102024440.GA17609@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Wed, 1 Nov 2017 22:44:40 -0400") Message-ID: <86wp35wqml.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29072 Cc: 29072@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) On 11/01/2017 at 22:44 Leo Famulari writes: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:40:47PM -0400, myglc2 wrote: >> On 11/01/2017 at 11:27 Leo Famulari writes: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:40:28AM -0400, myglc2 wrote: >> >> Binary file ./gnu/packages/qemu.go matches >> > >> > Try deleting this compiled qemu.go and then try again. >> >> Thank you Leo. >> >> I deleted ./gnu/packages/qemu.go and re-ran make. >> >> Make failed to regenerate ./gnu/packages/qemu.go >> >> So now I am really confused. > > The 'gnu/packages/qemu.scm' file was removed from Guix in July 2017, > with commit 59132b800093e486e4d81aed6b837e9ac76aa86c. The QEMU packages > were moved into 'gnu/packages/virtualization.scm'. > > I'm not an Autotools expert, but in cases like this I usually try `make > clean && ./configure --localstatedir=/var && make`. Did you try > something like that yet? Thanks Leo. I did a new git pull and a clean build as you suggested (please see the grep of the make.log below for details) Now when I try 'guix system build sys.scm I get ... guix system: error: failed to load 'sys.scm': ice-9/boot-9.scm:2795:6: In procedure resolve-interface: ice-9/boot-9.scm:2795:6: no code for module (gnu packages qemu) ... please see details further below. Obviously something is calling 'gnu/packages/qemu.scm' but I don't understand what. TIA - George make.log -------- g1@g1 ~/src/guix$ grep g1@g1 make.log g1@g1 ~/src/guix$ guix environment -e "(@ (gnu packages package-management) guix)" -M 4 -c 4 g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ git fetch g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ git pull g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ git status g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ rm -fr /home/g1/.cache/guile/ccache/* g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ make clean-go g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ ./bootstrap g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ ./configure --localstatedir=/var g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ make -j 10 check g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ ln -f -s -T ~/src/guix/ ~/.config/guix/latest g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ sudo ln -f -s -T ~/src/guix/ /root/.config/guix/latest g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ git status g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ git remote -vv g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ git branch -av | grep \* g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ exit g1@g1 ~/src/guix$ exit g1@g1 ~/src/guix$ root@g1 ~/con/15# guix system --cores=4 --max-jobs=4 -K --on-error=debug build sys.scm guix system: error: failed to load 'sys.scm': ice-9/boot-9.scm:2795:6: In procedure resolve-interface: ice-9/boot-9.scm:2795:6: no code for module (gnu packages qemu) entering debugger; type ',bt' for a backtrace GNU Guile 2.2.2 Copyright (C) 1995-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'. This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details. Enter `,help' for help. scheme@(#{ g440}#)> ,q root@g1 ~/con/15# which guix /run/current-system/profile/bin/guix root@g1 ~/con/15# stat ~/.config/guix/latest | grep File: File: /root/.config/guix/latest -> /home/g1/src/guix/ root@g1 ~/con/15# root@g1 ~/con/15# git -C ~/.config/guix/latest status On branch o-master Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'. nothing to commit, working tree clean root@g1 ~/con/15# git -C ~/.config/guix/latest remote -vv origin git://git.savannah.gnu.org/guix.git (fetch) origin git://git.savannah.gnu.org/guix.git (push) root@g1 ~/con/15# git -C ~/.config/guix/latest log -n 1 --oneline 46dea1241 (HEAD -> o-master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) gnu: icedtea: Update to 3.6.0 [security fixes]. root@g1 ~/con/15# exit exit Process shell finished From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 05 12:46:43 2017 Received: (at 29072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2017 17:46:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52549 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBP0M-0000Po-UD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2017 12:46:43 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:53412) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBP0L-0000Pa-Tw for 29072@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2017 12:46:42 -0500 Received: from localhost (46-117-130-79.bb.netvision.net.il [46.117.130.79]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D12AD40078; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 17:46:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 19:46:34 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: myglc2 Subject: Re: bug#29072: guix system: error: qemu-CVE-2017-7493.patch: patch not found Message-ID: <20171105174634.GA1815@macbook41> References: <86fua04bpb.fsf@gmail.com> <20171031003153.GA24788@jasmine.lan> <86y3nquko3.fsf@gmail.com> <20171101152708.GA21123@jasmine.lan> <86shdxv1w0.fsf@gmail.com> <20171102024440.GA17609@jasmine.lan> <86wp35wqml.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86wp35wqml.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29072 Cc: 29072@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 07:50:10PM -0400, myglc2 wrote: > On 11/01/2017 at 22:44 Leo Famulari writes: >=20 > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:40:47PM -0400, myglc2 wrote: > >> On 11/01/2017 at 11:27 Leo Famulari writes: > >>=20 > >> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:40:28AM -0400, myglc2 wrote: > >> >> Binary file ./gnu/packages/qemu.go matches =20 > >> > > >> > Try deleting this compiled qemu.go and then try again. > >>=20 > >> Thank you Leo. > >>=20 > >> I deleted ./gnu/packages/qemu.go and re-ran make. > >>=20 > >> Make failed to regenerate ./gnu/packages/qemu.go > >>=20 > >> So now I am really confused. > > > > The 'gnu/packages/qemu.scm' file was removed from Guix in July 2017, > > with commit 59132b800093e486e4d81aed6b837e9ac76aa86c. The QEMU packages > > were moved into 'gnu/packages/virtualization.scm'. > > > > I'm not an Autotools expert, but in cases like this I usually try `make > > clean && ./configure --localstatedir=3D/var && make`. Did you try > > something like that yet? >=20 > Thanks Leo. >=20 > I did a new git pull and a clean build as you suggested (please see the > grep of the make.log below for details) >=20 > Now when I try 'guix system build sys.scm I get ... >=20 > guix system: error: failed to load 'sys.scm': > ice-9/boot-9.scm:2795:6: In procedure resolve-interface: > ice-9/boot-9.scm:2795:6: no code for module (gnu packages qemu) >=20 > ... please see details further below. Obviously something is calling > 'gnu/packages/qemu.scm' but I don't understand what. >=20 > TIA - George >=20 > make.log > -------- > g1@g1 ~/src/guix$ grep g1@g1 make.log=20 > g1@g1 ~/src/guix$ guix environment -e "(@ (gnu packages package-managemen= t) guix)" -M 4 -c 4 > g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ git fetch > g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ git pull > g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ git status > g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ rm -fr /home/g1/.cache/guile/ccache/* > g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ make clean-go was there any mention at the end of 'make clean-go' about there being stray *go files left? > g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ ./bootstrap > g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ ./configure --localstatedir=3D/var > g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ make -j 10 check > g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ ln -f -s -T ~/src/guix/ ~/.config/guix/latest > g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ sudo ln -f -s -T ~/src/guix/ /root/.config/guix/l= atest > g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ git status > g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ git remote -vv > g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ git branch -av | grep \* > g1@g1 ~/src/guix [env]$ exit > g1@g1 ~/src/guix$ exit > g1@g1 ~/src/guix$ >=20 >=20 > root@g1 ~/con/15# guix system --cores=3D4 --max-jobs=3D4 -K --on-error=3D= debug build sys.scm > guix system: error: failed to load 'sys.scm': > ice-9/boot-9.scm:2795:6: In procedure resolve-interface: > ice-9/boot-9.scm:2795:6: no code for module (gnu packages qemu) >=20 Can you post your sys.scm? It sounds like you might have a references to (gnu packages qemu) listed there. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAln/TncACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1Hz4g/+IvFmjWrA+jWxJLQh+4GCms1i9fyACbe0faX0/cu3dgNBvqahANv8Nr9D gIh5BCu01WeeoGsWJ7tlNC1FqUh/P3xpBEx1orWhyuGnvf6gKDj3NN+mmQuMe/op 0MiJKVUl56Z5l8XcDEFwfkgoq28eFo7hNJJAenLLmv3xE08JCXaoNsg0nIZHc2/f /TZUwlXIO69OQJd4srow8MEskL9Y4xwBDuu8Fwc26voOuYg54N5oY3svuFfi0TVa qCdew4lbvU/uXpTbvdc0waXkCpIGXYlA36vhOEbLkjEzxAKLLpJWs7QKosoC8jz4 boSis1A1eLyI4T31WyGUUrDeo1BXJclG1wCDMJ92Gv47SXKrZfx5iG59m90R+NSQ kZbT8q1cAguQTCt8giOtme3T2vRcf+yCvKK40tI9Mlr2trfvSmUPJ0NOsnSb/jVr hTlElrQkFKcDRMe1OUeEPad4xc0HvTDFs8yamk17glMFLZ562M9VgOjyHFM/3PQ0 tZuePGf7BfhbWi2u15kClWlzKgepbZuYBGSqpctOT9BikjK/xllqCdzHSozze75p odnkVkXT1vx5aAquE2NLQMVIQsqIWPR7wBhXH8nwaWsR6tLbAFzh3VeSvkOawsZN 2ldWnhibzHldDFu3QXPtum7SgSnHBXJPCFvmu7FmNbTld1s38Qc= =LppA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 05 20:15:49 2017 Received: (at 29072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2017 01:15:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52823 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBW0z-0001gw-O9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2017 20:15:49 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f182.google.com ([209.85.220.182]:45214) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBW0y-0001gk-Cj for 29072@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2017 20:15:48 -0500 Received: by mail-qk0-f182.google.com with SMTP id f199so9162970qke.2 for <29072@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 05 Nov 2017 17:15:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=VZpWYCZcO60vANigrBIm5AeZ89lha08WyBV3wLk9iTY=; b=Aw+oQtcakK2uJF1HWIokrFaJY1IQK12m6JGwf90dtV93dcnm1hVWHnVeRVCe+LQy8U jDAzb9YnxLTnw/sYTLjzeQhLkbWfCfN3GuwBMsjUbw1Ct/yMqVwH3RydNh5li3LzyVm2 o4XgtTAplU2q7Lfhimk4D04dyC6g7WX36wjBUYwIlrh9sw6lxHiOK4CCiDtMCevBz497 6pqNljxhEOLZjI2Q4DGPGq0zPD1EZ/J9R+2jMPLRh2uDAzSkSoBRr3DzveOT+hYjpJJB OxhV9jp1+tvfEG9kdMaM++bNK6qhvpgC3pbaVi2nGNJ6KxFXRhrnn+WAY+IbfpOAuviH uZxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=VZpWYCZcO60vANigrBIm5AeZ89lha08WyBV3wLk9iTY=; b=rCBMnQ/aJn4qBveF91hFDkzVnDsA43tpqZVSAadPr7eEZjZ5TlmiKby5bMxC3yK+Vl A+WBclrKmmb+/4OMqpQuJwuZOREN3NoqSjcjsxhSfkEBUu0ymjJZRVWKyR7et1ZoOIeA F9SnUB9cYG/KRe9g4Jh3SkZ5VePDBv2wLvdYlQQ53LTRslVBSxvGXM0+AhXWmwlA45YA cbP6m9AuqCW+fHxGVYXQL+dKTKtnkauqVpx+vRYTD4W5NegEZU1+w9Zr+rNe6Ymv99iY yXd7IyU7aLcnyE6jZmgK7fSUDxYpkbJcNIcEYpwCwxp9UUzuOreWzThusYwhWXHxnxRr nXRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6u6PhNHmklCaBEpl9OHVPSAax9zwMMftQabub2wqZfAkHtGgLf YA8AnYDIlQ7pwKVFqt/Ew09hHw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TnVV1Ib8gdrpYLPLoEhLhDR8dx79oFnCOcUTuwZLeBQIBklZD/TEIujf18CfOWTBharr1f2w== X-Received: by 10.55.122.193 with SMTP id v184mr17962857qkc.317.1509930942910; Sun, 05 Nov 2017 17:15:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from g1 (c-73-167-118-254.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.118.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g7sm7406537qkf.72.2017.11.05.17.15.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 05 Nov 2017 17:15:41 -0800 (PST) From: myglc2 To: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: bug#29072: guix system: error: qemu-CVE-2017-7493.patch: patch not found References: <86fua04bpb.fsf@gmail.com> <20171031003153.GA24788@jasmine.lan> <86y3nquko3.fsf@gmail.com> <20171101152708.GA21123@jasmine.lan> <86shdxv1w0.fsf@gmail.com> <20171102024440.GA17609@jasmine.lan> <86wp35wqml.fsf@gmail.com> <20171105174634.GA1815@macbook41> Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2017 20:15:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20171105174634.GA1815@macbook41> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Sun, 5 Nov 2017 19:46:34 +0200") Message-ID: <86tvy82on6.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29072 Cc: 29072@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) On 11/05/2017 at 19:46 Efraim Flashner writes: > On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 07:50:10PM -0400, myglc2 wrote: >> On 11/01/2017 at 22:44 Leo Famulari writes: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:40:47PM -0400, myglc2 wrote: >> >> On 11/01/2017 at 11:27 Leo Famulari writes: >> >> [...] >> > The 'gnu/packages/qemu.scm' file was removed from Guix in July 2017, >> > with commit 59132b800093e486e4d81aed6b837e9ac76aa86c. The QEMU packages >> > were moved into 'gnu/packages/virtualization.scm'. >> > [...] >> >> root@g1 ~/con/15# guix system --cores=4 --max-jobs=4 -K --on-error=debug build sys.scm >> guix system: error: failed to load 'sys.scm': >> ice-9/boot-9.scm:2795:6: In procedure resolve-interface: >> ice-9/boot-9.scm:2795:6: no code for module (gnu packages qemu) >> > > Can you post your sys.scm? It sounds like you might have a references to > (gnu packages qemu) listed there. Yes Efraim, that was it. Actually, Leo mentioned that qemu had moved (above) but I failed to realize the implication for the config file. Many thanks! - George From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 06 15:12:22 2017 Received: (at 29072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2017 20:12:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54608 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBnks-00043Q-2e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:12:22 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]:49323) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBnkp-00043B-Bz for 29072@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:12:21 -0500 Received: by mail-qk0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q83so12552297qke.6 for <29072@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 12:12:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=V9YYxWMe1VZb2yCCq9z6OxsebfsPV4AfJiKXlT8PN0I=; b=TDcVpj4vEOgvfzA5QgiVuAjJe5lWLH6Ow4742eiWYPIXb/NxS4VChKQchAnS0bE9e9 AjqRL4XXlKiz7aMJ2sblC0I4hP6nUWya7v1GsKWsUrvE14o+VWorQETuCTYXaqzCXTMV 3jUP7/xSLdUtmpTkHTd/KHQSbPclNMAaRlqsoZ751aoSBwlX2NZqh9Ie790MJMUvAOdt yebQchPpeXeQdScekwKcZ1aRgXw3D2yZatzKrz7SY00+IDXA1ylLOy0TrlPyknDCxcuM 2djzXKuHbyG2w9zDNWP8smX9a/hfPEvN5RpVgLPqBW1/pHSHNaecNP/eE4MeJf83qSY7 8L3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=V9YYxWMe1VZb2yCCq9z6OxsebfsPV4AfJiKXlT8PN0I=; b=jno0KVuUs/j2ov+POk20xoeHl99r9rPvQtDbAHMXwwmK3c+R0A+Tx5KpONF6hSShXa QP1N4JuR8CoDZB5H7gBMqddo9Gi9UbYtNOZQHO7R2jkhgpqnHrSSa7snF1DadGiT38bQ 4q9lb7QtCi2uYUuQ4fGE+rQzV76igYYRcmsXrc19I0047MQyMBhJBsXQ6JlZzuk6R8yQ Wj2drj0cdYxcA0gy8Se7b9gR5imab0CzCyxb113T3KjUVoquIykDUdXSzmP2p1wOCs5S pWoNDGI3IoCy2KnWx50Z+QYeS63hkI5heR55ia7I8pzLjsN8P4YHiVxlpab3A1sOyQp1 9o4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7utOPbxw6c2cbR7tffFmbQqVMVQP5k0jVuqCB0vGIHwvVauWBT LGc/XkBNNOKrcDsvquF85VqWYSTr X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QBY/ifidWnu3r3cePSP+9pvXC4bKpJkNnnhIrIXKL3tRKYO61hoS2+gfxJ8gZYsiP1k6NP/g== X-Received: by 10.55.134.1 with SMTP id i1mr22700799qkd.195.1509999133565; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 12:12:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from g1 (c-73-167-118-254.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.118.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k79sm8662778qke.28.2017.11.06.12.12.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Nov 2017 12:12:12 -0800 (PST) From: myglc2 To: Guix-devel Subject: The usability of Guix configurations Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:12:11 -0500 Message-ID: <868tfjw4is.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29072 Cc: 29072@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner , Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) My system recently broke when I did an upgrade. I reported what I thought was a bug (bug#29072) but it turned out that, because qemu package code had been moved, my system configuration had become broken ;-( Confronted with my situation, helpful developers said "The package code was moved in commit xxx" (Leo) and "maybe you have a mistake in your config (Efraim)." Once I understood what had happened I wondered, "Gee, I have been using guix for 18 months so why didn't I figure this out myself." ;-) But a less committed user might say, "Wow, Guix breaks at random, error messages are hard to understand, and support is difficult." :-( ISTM this raises issues and questions about Guix configuration usability: Guix config errors are reported as raw scheme errors which are not user-friendly, except, perhaps, to guile users ;-) Could we improve this situation by adding config troubleshooting guidance to the doc? Guix config errors consume meaningful amounts of user and support effort. I say this because a) it took quite a few iterations to figure out what was wrong in my situation, and b) google search for '"no code for module" guix' finds 613 hits, which will no doubt grow linearly with number of Guix users unless something is done. So I wonder, could an error handler that translates into more user-friendly terms reduce user frustration, increase the rate of user self help, reduce support load, and effectively pay for itself? Are the current Guix config errors usable by the average GNU/Linux distribution user? If not, don't they need to be improved before we call it 1.0? Does this mean that package code must not be moved after 1.0? Finally: Should I close bug#29072? ;-) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 06 17:16:26 2017 Received: (at 29072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2017 22:16:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54767 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBpgw-0002CJ-8A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 17:16:26 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:55839) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBpgu-0002AZ-P4 for 29072@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 17:16:25 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509EE20C6E; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:16:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 06 Nov 2017 17:16:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=SgXDmcF8WxJMTtioyqmCgbYGJgGSu17l9tHjBUCrZ/w=; b=GiXxa JWcpJqCMs8iwLeW2R4blYOfK3biccY9k9gafrC6BLyRkG8AQa4vuqTQXHEPfz0lK 9nKnpDNoaGY+uImaS4nT71gGQVVe5/DAqWFxvLzIU4DSF4QcVAaLHL8GTOsEu2KD jqkBQb1uMhT7v2q3jShbVta1lANBUQj6G6Qowk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=SgXDmcF8WxJMTtioyqmCgbYGJgGSu 17l9tHjBUCrZ/w=; b=YAwudotOXhqFpeHRIRToSXXa5UgFiQLidR4Yv+fRZ+qCE By6cpwz13iFrHoxhsUKS1mVvaWm1ySqVr06TNnZN84HcwWP9uI9MoIb35VW3CUGv x63GOwWLaoKdiMEmyTKw1p3uNDy76fvfFqBJHHwl+TBvlSzUnstFahRy52FcQKP1 rSdLy/hFARhK1ZTPOEzYiWptu6JlD3QAI2VUgb75WpLyR0cfKnU9a7sUf+iMDGCa p0CV3Lo3LlslyaDI26aVSzNYs9m9/N86i8SETtzRp8h/wFjso8Ar6mxzYmR3ET7y XuU3WoN8vQs+S541TgHcn6M3xfHAuuExY9lDNbxHw== X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (c-73-165-108-70.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.165.108.70]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0B067242CF; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:16:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:16:21 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: myglc2 Subject: Re: The usability of Guix configurations Message-ID: <20171106221621.GA2534@jasmine.lan> References: <868tfjw4is.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <868tfjw4is.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29072 Cc: Guix-devel , Efraim Flashner , 29072@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 03:12:11PM -0500, myglc2 wrote: > My system recently broke when I did an upgrade. I reported what I > thought was a bug (bug#29072) but it turned out that, because qemu > package code had been moved, my system configuration had become broken > ;-( >=20 > Confronted with my situation, helpful developers said "The package code > was moved in commit xxx" (Leo) and "maybe you have a mistake in your > config (Efraim)." I'm sorry that my comment was not enough on its own! > Once I understood what had happened I wondered, "Gee, I have been using > guix for 18 months so why didn't I figure this out myself." ;-) >=20 > But a less committed user might say, "Wow, Guix breaks at random, error > messages are hard to understand, and support is difficult." :-( Good point. > ISTM this raises issues and questions about Guix configuration > usability: Indeed. > Guix config errors are reported as raw scheme errors which are not > user-friendly, except, perhaps, to guile users ;-) Could we improve this > situation by adding config troubleshooting guidance to the doc? Yes, we do try to add helpful error messages, although obviously there is a lot more work to be done. As far as I can tell, the issue was related to the fact that you are using Guix by building it from source and re-using the same build directory, which may contain stale compiled .go files. In this case, there was a leftover qemu.go, which shadowed the correct file, virtualization.go. This is a useful development technique but not how Guix is supposed to be deployed and updated. `guix pull && guix package --upgrade` is still what we recommend and support. If you want to deploy Guix by building it "by hand", I recommend using a fresh Git checkout and directory each time you build it. That way, you can be sure to avoid this class of error (stale module references in leftover .go files), which is well-known to the seasoned Guix developers but totally confounding for everyone else. > Guix config errors consume meaningful amounts of user and support > effort. I say this because a) it took quite a few iterations to figure > out what was wrong in my situation, and b) google search for '"no code > for module" guix' finds 613 hits, which will no doubt grow linearly with > number of Guix users unless something is done. So I wonder, could an > error handler that translates into more user-friendly terms reduce user > frustration, increase the rate of user self help, reduce support load, > and effectively pay for itself? That would be awesome! > Are the current Guix config errors usable by the average GNU/Linux > distribution user? If not, don't they need to be improved before we call > it 1.0? Based on how much time it's possible to spend on IRC helping people, I'd say there is lots of room for improvement in this area. > Does this mean that package code must not be moved after 1.0? A couple thoughts... it would be nice if the GuixSD configuration example templates used a filename agnostic method of resolving module imports. I'm not a strong enough Schemer to evaluate the situation or suggest a solution, but I think that the filenames should not be relevant at that level. Perhaps one could use 'specification->package+output', as demonstrated in the documentation of package manifests: https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Invoking-guix-package.ht= ml > Finally: Should I close bug#29072? ;-) The problem of the missing QEMU patch is resolved. The broader issue of confusing error messages could be continued here, or elsewhere. It's up to you :) --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAloA3zIACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgM5g/+INGvxiPPmr1aBYY++SwQKyKcFGp7BVarobyxi8aRLKgrQTm0L0gTbE8v y2+OZbgEEVF3Ts6DbK1elxWbgGpj+N6teeiWXrArGI7AvyRm7EgSqVSE0UzULRV8 0uBlr/JQyunI0ST49OvavS1dUlZKrQSsTg9GM/vRM1AbGg6t4yEYY4Ovu8pmbI8o fz94se39QOdzx6EFfzGF3KeDwD5z1Ex5scDmN/bMUyobjMJvpaOPYW9aLmnHFzId Nx7k/QgBwZQyQAEUW2NvbzT+2ATlZxfkSucUQYRopgrw0QsxNdCC2KQ7y+cy04SX ZprURZp8hiT80zFSyAq1TvGsldZkb2mgm0bilosVjk1rkthOOoT+20bjzzQfZ1M2 gjxbHB08yUUGUR6ZHyfKD+9BBifvaSGTZX408XW5r2RP7ox3U11WEn3U6HgkwzZr 8or/d9NL2NDneht444tHJEug38kSHY/pJjVmEdj3yYsZM4XCZ9PtLFuQSKb2zzwB b2ZCMcx2TVZbpr6oXF7odEfDc1kf8R+FnlHWIpNlKx4Hq+JduL0yrTeTkk56ClPN V4YlGWrGy14SZHoYY5T4pcX0/CtdkZzgUl7O7mmGgE/9fOcB1awfJzvOz+zjfwg/ Td956/kqnOxDHZ2Xdxw4a68e6Parioh1qO3+8Be7/lOAMMzXY6w= =32nF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 06 18:26:36 2017 Received: (at 29072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2017 23:26:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54874 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBqmp-0008JU-QS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 18:26:35 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:56138) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBqmo-0008JI-6p for 29072@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 18:26:34 -0500 Received: by mail-qk0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x195so7533323qkb.12 for <29072@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:26:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=g0SAH6M//X+9eqv9AcXbIJx1gTwVrIwdFSVRVcLU4cE=; b=WyNCQTva3E+eWs1fXHU7sf0+vO8goNOmce5aOSdRSzG+36aPAyJjoCX8122AgmIRy/ +Vn8qG9+XsyhiAmDAEV30J/Wdi1f2xiGgpGIYHPeunrwQYFnFFcNw5EnzhiwbxU1x8zp +R3zD6AjD8PmMjv6ZErfTFLy4nnyrRpcG799bRTpggDds1eZflfeXLkocOCWu+E0eGuB Ct+1j1dcDYHDcN3wJGQnOU+iIJQKslXxsHOQImt/1np99MuHBkse09ApqbnhNwq+qbgB vEfwR5QANqSE/dKzomUiYdciwLnNtrIFjCvNZm4lmCcy18dFmX+GK/sABCrlugoFhrdS ak4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=g0SAH6M//X+9eqv9AcXbIJx1gTwVrIwdFSVRVcLU4cE=; b=XQlaYhmmyXrrfQQnU3vqBAwxj9+IFUjBHo4d9vzVLIU/PnMPNbbjZEs/QM6253NKxi ol17mZ9R69IAOr+baeltKhHjFTcaE4jPP9JUBAODSghzP8vCKmkbr8L7wIkw0umKcuS8 D8cMY8gD1uy7lcp5W5kDRUvTL0sjSwDwt6KuJqhSOfDdK0cmZwQT11EeZ19OEcOVVeod 0tFyoZBcmVgXl3qZHGdT5hb0z0Qf1eJhxySUCsxxlZpjZpb/2KBNd+SO8h1/cQ3BGycc 2BTB2kpVaBqjNzJbAzzzwGqmkDQtgBOnUs1cNxz4o143rzZi2y4BjUeHauhllts4EJxH A9lw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6yUq9RtufVJQSgn+xt0mPk9SgaHcRiwZytoBnSuSrxth/X8wmT kGTk0gILbLXmRnXkXWoZvDgQ6wm/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RtS6xKNMHJG/0Mtz8nU2mEig9b12oSfftzoVarqA6X0YTtwPxQeuFfXApz2ZkZH2p5AjZuew== X-Received: by 10.55.75.130 with SMTP id y124mr4654975qka.255.1510010788515; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:26:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from g1 (c-73-167-118-254.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.118.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f62sm2527087qkh.51.2017.11.06.15.26.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:26:27 -0800 (PST) References: <868tfjw4is.fsf@gmail.com> <20171106221621.GA2534@jasmine.lan> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.3.1 From: myglc2 To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: The usability of Guix configurations In-reply-to: <20171106221621.GA2534@jasmine.lan> Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 18:26:26 -0500 Message-ID: <86wp330z19.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29072 Cc: Guix-devel , Efraim Flashner , 29072@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) Please note: these replies separated by topics in an effort to make the threads more topical ... On 11/06/2017 at 22:16 Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 03:12:11PM -0500, myglc2 wrote: >> My system recently broke when I did an upgrade. I reported what I >> thought was a bug (bug#29072) but it turned out that, because qemu >> package code had been moved, my system configuration had become broken >> ;-( >> >> Confronted with my situation, helpful developers said "The package code >> was moved in commit xxx" (Leo) and "maybe you have a mistake in your >> config (Efraim)." > > I'm sorry that my comment was not enough on its own! Hey Leo, Please understand that don't mean this as a complaint your reply, which was helpful and I was very happy to receive. I am just trying to step back and think about the bigger picture. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 06 20:56:57 2017 Received: (at 29072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2017 01:56:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54969 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBt8L-0007LP-Dn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 20:56:57 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-f182.google.com ([209.85.216.182]:50808) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBt8K-0007LB-4b for 29072@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 20:56:56 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-f182.google.com with SMTP id d9so13481595qtd.7 for <29072@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 17:56:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=XCMngpGam5NNbqcTOLnX6BBS/9Dtb12OFMAK8N66uaw=; b=J+zXlib4E7fydeoqAGEw54yJYC+FLtMdxBA/JCAHwxR/IIvcNaTN3adjU4K6PxNzfl PajB1r2gCleUxWIOTIIlx+Z13668ub2Cp+QLTVi68atnh6ra6QENCas9zy6y/gmLX6Bk 79zB3JZEZuup9p+0WmiJ6EtvARnn5nMwIQCaHE/SWSpG+wSBuQBN0qTrXdSv2LKWAYN2 sCMFr+CUVY4qaaAuVqVzEAMU6/vgK4v99iia7CnlvUY6n5M7vGdzu1GJfF5lcLN8PF/P 8cJSKLWRaLc0ZQxDEoq8ENLro0JD8YgXHghEuogTRMlZ12blxZEjRPNIGON+OoWq9ZB2 dyhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=XCMngpGam5NNbqcTOLnX6BBS/9Dtb12OFMAK8N66uaw=; b=OdILbMixrgGCLJJwLQTSkVdD8EIoRsxHu32nXeG3eRv7Mtxr1eU4RtmGTLQ5d1JESS PnljSI2scJ20YDRj+w5uhE4q3uuTpoPjc6+fy4rDzfCoNore4fMQ/wyPK26PJUb2EfbF HKk5GTpb/xfGOOrKpjdXGYpNdHnC2CInYDkHCGwnykgvTHvhLST+ra7I1U2cERAQGNer /sog7eR760BWp6fNFDHa65k6ZMqQsjcfIdihSRnFAJO5yVhSFDMev/14lNczOkBTx5rX wex/tLGCfZjOZWGGHaZachmuZ8vZBey5CyIx+q08Cvfkb7sqOmaPLC1HnCJ+75Q+U900 UNnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVSGnUO6mIXtNIY4wTph4nn4kT//lOQ6tudnJ8J7IoCTGc3g+8Q A3up+RmD0WOQujgpmoVMUI/QOuNk X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+T+ranEWXiUANf8kEbZtos3bZdEHJ2i5I+1xCC9XiQvWjdCum5hUxsGYMZ58Z+s4p8JHUTWSg== X-Received: by 10.200.7.75 with SMTP id k11mr24365884qth.122.1510019810355; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 17:56:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from g1 (c-73-167-118-254.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.118.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t67sm85571qkt.52.2017.11.06.17.56.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Nov 2017 17:56:49 -0800 (PST) From: myglc2 To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: The usability of Guix configurations References: <868tfjw4is.fsf@gmail.com> <20171106221621.GA2534@jasmine.lan> Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 20:56:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20171106221621.GA2534@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:16:21 -0500") Message-ID: <86o9oex34v.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29072 Cc: Guix-devel , Efraim Flashner , 29072@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Please note: these replies are separated by topics in an effort to make the threads more topical ... On 11/06/2017 at 17:16 Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 03:12:11PM -0500, myglc2 wrote: [...] >> Guix config errors are reported as raw scheme errors which are not >> user-friendly, except, perhaps, to guile users ;-) Could we improve this >> situation by adding config troubleshooting guidance to the doc? > > Yes, we do try to add helpful error messages, although obviously there > is a lot more work to be done. I didn't mean this point critically. Rather as a statement of fact. When I said ... >> Could we improve this situation by adding config troubleshooting >> guidance to the doc? ... I was thinking something like ... vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv Troubleshooting your config file: If you get an error like: ice-9/boot-9.scm:[...] no code for module (gnu packages ) You have either specified a package name that does not exist, or your (use-package-modules ) does not contain the name of a package module that contains the definition of . You can determine which, if any, module contains a package definition by yada yada yada ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ... thinking that then there would be a search hit in the doc for 'no code for module' which might enable some users to understand what they are doing wrong. WDYT? - George From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 06 21:30:52 2017 Received: (at 29072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2017 02:30:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54992 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBtf9-0008Bt-Sq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 21:30:52 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]:51952) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBtf7-0008Bg-OM for 29072@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 21:30:50 -0500 Received: by mail-qk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id n66so8947582qki.8 for <29072@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 18:30:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=I6Zp7xtwPz3DZCpX/CvowhaNoV9+T7QYDcJuJJ+vzr0=; b=AKO5yTif7fnXW+rBy6M+mVVjrJa47nLKzhLvCUyuxau7WD3fKF/tN4cXd/VXbYmIis /rIjg2ZDJic/1vrxDD/7kkCHmWpHee3F/p/PE+aXVcSdd3RHFPwKu3LHWGAXW3yxlg9u RQ8x4UN8LR7YtIoM7q8MyftJ4zQFOelNW9MNUQYwfCfWbqw4UqnAAyH2Uc+HdLRZVVIS 8itON0Vhn3b1pWRq461PGojsMX532c4h+bhgmAAsCuLJsolDKZmhzeav14r7y/DHfH3/ N5BdSigcdkbxLRoLguhLhiTqMzdc6sGBnmz5RkNMyyiiv4LhMfP0qWiBK3GXDoE2qR/V JW3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=I6Zp7xtwPz3DZCpX/CvowhaNoV9+T7QYDcJuJJ+vzr0=; b=kfDkH2gFxwqC8sc1SErety7W+FNiDEqczIk7lLf81nXyWvh0DS2SE8noqm0FxhyuAg piFSNXmQtNuYrooUlUwwRKljrZ+BNmhhbDRln4+DUYeT9WMz/3EGZWQyUh3h658DileG FKQ+620vECd+aWaxuDqSjeDTIiIUn4aXk4W/MA0JqA7uQIr/8SRU3fYXqbvJsbboug3t ADXg2OX0/eL5ktVaX/1pyUh6pu/zmuYLZ8Y68U/Zn9fykUeP8rznMW25iFXREBEvf9mo zubm6HBBGXJY12037IaB8qruOFMfJWZZ26U8WoFpxE4fvsZEcjhxhOHp8RFQ9gDugFbW cjAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7vv/3mE2TQe1PgZTojB8UhnAR5yEzMxs1MEdJOha9Ws2x9XRwc aJQNEpZRkryVRc8F6q1i+6bE8b5G X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RLORCtsE2kQ+vynF+smtHDeMyBzrPGng4swioBm0LNJqrYjKaVw2KdLszlNutgFzU/vIvcNg== X-Received: by 10.55.20.105 with SMTP id e102mr8721750qkh.89.1510021843962; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 18:30:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from g1 (c-73-167-118-254.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.118.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k11sm107134qtb.95.2017.11.06.18.30.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Nov 2017 18:30:43 -0800 (PST) From: myglc2 To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: The usability of Guix configurations References: <868tfjw4is.fsf@gmail.com> <20171106221621.GA2534@jasmine.lan> Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 21:30:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20171106221621.GA2534@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:16:21 -0500") Message-ID: <86h8u6x1ke.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29072 Cc: Guix-devel , Efraim Flashner , 29072@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) On 11/06/2017 at 17:16 Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 03:12:11PM -0500, myglc2 wrote: >> My system recently broke when I did an upgrade. I reported what I >> thought was a bug (bug#29072) but it turned out that, because qemu >> package code had been moved, my system configuration had become broken >> ;-( >> >> Confronted with my situation, helpful developers said "The package code >> was moved in commit xxx" (Leo) and "maybe you have a mistake in your >> config (Efraim)." > > I'm sorry that my comment was not enough on its own! > >> Once I understood what had happened I wondered, "Gee, I have been using >> guix for 18 months so why didn't I figure this out myself." ;-) >> >> But a less committed user might say, "Wow, Guix breaks at random, error >> messages are hard to understand, and support is difficult." :-( > > Good point. > >> ISTM this raises issues and questions about Guix configuration >> usability: > > Indeed. > >> Guix config errors are reported as raw scheme errors which are not >> user-friendly, except, perhaps, to guile users ;-) Could we improve this >> situation by adding config troubleshooting guidance to the doc? > > Yes, we do try to add helpful error messages, although obviously there > is a lot more work to be done. [...] > >> Guix config errors consume meaningful amounts of user and support >> effort. I say this because a) it took quite a few iterations to figure >> out what was wrong in my situation, and b) google search for '"no code >> for module" guix' finds 613 hits, which will no doubt grow linearly with >> number of Guix users unless something is done. So I wonder, could an >> error handler that translates into more user-friendly terms reduce user >> frustration, increase the rate of user self help, reduce support load, >> and effectively pay for itself? > > That would be awesome! > >> Are the current Guix config errors usable by the average GNU/Linux >> distribution user? If not, don't they need to be improved before we call >> it 1.0? > > Based on how much time it's possible to spend on IRC helping people, I'd > say there is lots of room for improvement in this area. > >> Does this mean that package code must not be moved after 1.0? > > A couple thoughts... it would be nice if the GuixSD configuration > example templates used a filename agnostic method of resolving module > imports. I'm not a strong enough Schemer to evaluate the situation or > suggest a solution, but I think that the filenames should not be > relevant at that level. Perhaps one could use > 'specification->package+output', > as demonstrated in the documentation of package manifests: > > https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Invoking-guix-package.html > There is a parallel solution >> Finally: Should I close bug#29072? ;-) > > The problem of the missing QEMU patch is resolved. The broader issue of > confusing error messages could be continued here, or elsewhere. It's up > to you :) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 07 05:23:13 2017 Received: (at 29072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2017 10:23:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55208 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eC12H-0002rm-8F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 05:23:13 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:37384) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eC12F-0002rd-Lu for 29072@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 05:23:11 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00623F6AE; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:23:12 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3JBgyFaniEU0; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:23:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [193.50.110.150]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55440F6AD; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:23:11 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: myglc2 Subject: Re: The usability of Guix configurations References: <868tfjw4is.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 17 Brumaire an 226 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 11:23:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <868tfjw4is.fsf@gmail.com> (myglc2@gmail.com's message of "Mon, 06 Nov 2017 15:12:11 -0500") Message-ID: <87po8u9ylu.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29072 Cc: Guix-devel , 29072@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hello, myglc2 skribis: > My system recently broke when I did an upgrade. I reported what I > thought was a bug (bug#29072) but it turned out that, because qemu > package code had been moved, my system configuration had become broken > ;-( It should be noted that you were using a =E2=80=9Cdeveloper setup=E2=80=9D,= specifically running Guix from a checkout with ./pre-inst-env and all. The issue with the stale module wouldn=E2=80=99t happen with =E2=80=9Cguix = pull=E2=80=9D, which is the recommended =E2=80=9Cuser setup.=E2=80=9D While I agree the situation is not ideal, I think we have to admit that developers can always shoot themselves in the foot, and that was one way of doing it. ;-) Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 07 13:28:39 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2017 18:28:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56970 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eC8c3-0002X9-1i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:28:39 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f182.google.com ([209.85.220.182]:52078) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eC8c1-0002Wx-Qw for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:28:38 -0500 Received: by mail-qk0-f182.google.com with SMTP id n66so181422qki.8 for ; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 10:28:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=fFII+nEYzRXNOxdMjbth1dRTwdacVmmOTh6XlUym41M=; b=udzPzc4rs7Dzq4s8cCSPRu4Cftd3AIxG+nhroOzRS1DTnDjgezgyJC2/hJXA4s5JB9 mGpKNLcyHxAMgN+S+148ItM8XI9Njt9mKnSacyngqQSeNpC4ADB0OGXrCRyRA0Ne9l8o fDcF78AIRGxMBjvtBTbmUBUWQcoEt5xc6vEI3vkvmk3BHpiUPLkt6UjCIJCCAqaRDzd5 uHRaQ551TPkYsZVmWgRrm0J9tyczxkX3MFDQTDlvv/SS8Yxc96O5VLQLkTroPImPjx03 O+RdnCNbkvN+cvatwhtcZRliGWn9I//u8XmT9+/RA4O6TArUsB4IoQky/GV9dhAKd8sf YCsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=fFII+nEYzRXNOxdMjbth1dRTwdacVmmOTh6XlUym41M=; b=sVhRKTA6fVYuwpaLP4rzwVuc4oQYCCYBjSQCd9x0xyzOwz+qmnlv7aqeWqOTDU5tkb HC1d8ECYhX9F6ZgcS0yc5KAm7rwHGFuuIxrmwZHZ8VdFrPsRxic0rAAoFZ4lIRCbAHfx VvruR4UHdEyQn6n16ZO72JwOuszBxA3RXp4q4mj2BYQPqf8i9O34AjUKnXwT8N1YOEkw Au8vEIsWMs7pMqu1GM9nB26vqQPnjbrPYA/ogbU/4WIYSfUZxQ/SjFrN0pfeNxKufj8B AOVA0hbR73ArxQyu+m7rKFjYDLD7hwmU9FFmT86NHRaEeGqas6Flr/A8gYeJx4nfWUsM 2T5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4pVgbscY3o1EPoWe194YHiSDR2UWqBqxhYyzobjjhhaYdUlO+R VDpvTiHKlqviCIGcfX1W9s6GO0ZN X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SH+Sv8BJ0Mhpiw71RCG8qCcFpfQki5snARPWlGAVc+SdiSErwtIywrhva/SM/b9N3FFCYYJw== X-Received: by 10.233.223.2 with SMTP id t2mr27786647qkf.331.1510079312160; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 10:28:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from g1 (c-73-167-118-254.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.118.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b45sm1281615qta.89.2017.11.07.10.28.30 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Nov 2017 10:28:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:28:30 -0500 Message-Id: <86zi7yrlip.fsf@gmail.com> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: myglc2 Subject: control message for bug #29072 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) tags 29072 notabug close 29072 From unknown Mon Aug 18 08:26:45 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator