From lennart.borgman@gmail.com Fri Apr 3 14:39:09 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 3 Apr 2009 21:39:09 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA,MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8 autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n33Ld6X5004148 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:39:07 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:45323 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Lpr6P-0003l6-Ds for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:39:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lpr6O-00026t-3o for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:39:05 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f167.google.com ([209.85.218.167]:60477) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lpr6N-00026R-Hx; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:39:03 -0400 Received: by bwz11 with SMTP id 11so1164598bwz.42 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:39:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vk0CnYCjzCP4yBQzuulCfIIdGoUbyUBjfbKERo3/B+0=; b=g0kMXawDOTvYbe0MhCMIGMkf6XXMWUMDA8CZSqC5jbhYtT88n1MKNi40zrP4OyRwFQ BqOsPiTFD65EkYVXNsAlcq/eKjwwSle385pVawNNlM9J4gf2IbvUX/TWeuOJQXtl7Uf5 jyBppyz+YhgNfMH8pk9P+aNzq+IQyKW4TdZ34= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LPuc9yX3LR57EBUEbG/z+K/xPuM+RBwdn8lUJVr61tj6QLZbw8fljV6hEOjFIwDLVC ApkYOI0B0p2fuI1QwCGYJAYOmXtrbO56ffyu64l845o7DEC+tsJ/AtahvmDvmwVeWOrF jvjIpyLdJgNcWI+/2iPLCaA0Eq5SPFrRn4yRs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.108.196 with SMTP id g4mr1495360fap.36.1238794740850; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:39:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 23:39:00 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Emacs-w32 Bug-Reports for 23.0.92.1 LENNART (patched) [WAS: 23.0.60; yanking raw-text into mini-buffer causes crash] From: Lennart Borgman To: MON KEY Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, help-emacs-windows@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, DvdS@austin.rr.com, rob.davenport@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:40 PM, MON KEY wrote: > I recently screwed up a bug report sent to help-emacs-windows@gnu.org: > =C2=A0"23.0.60; yanking raw-text into mini-buffer causes crash" > by somehow clobbering the operative bug description and details . > > In the wake of this report, I have received 2 (two) separate > pejorative emails "informing" about the use of > help-emacs-windows@gnu.org for filing bug reports when using the > Lennart build of GNU-Emacs for w32 (patched). In lieu of these emails > I suspect of having stepped into someone else's dog fight. > _Someone please FORMALLY CLARIFY the correct protocol for following situa= tion_ I feel a bit guilty so please forward any pejorative emails to me ;-) I have tried to arrange bug reporting the best way I could but maybe I have not been clear enough. If you are using the patched version to send then it will go to help-emacs-windows@gnu.org (h-e-w) as you have observed. In the beginning of the generated message there is this notice: This is a bug report for the PATCHED Emacs+EmacsW32. Please test the unpatched version of Emacs+EmacsW32 before reporting if you can. If the bug is also in the unpatched version then report from the unpatched version else report here. If it is very inconvenient for you to try the unpatched version, but you believe the bug is not related to the patches then you may change the address above to emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org I think this is a reasonable way to handle the difficulties with the bug reports for the patched version I distribute. David, you are in charge of h-e-w, did we discuss this before? I have forgotten. Since h-e-w is a low traffic list and those who use the patched version might be interested in this list anyway I have addressed the bug reports to this list. There are also very few bug reports that are specific to the patched version. > On that older Lennart build: Help > Send Bug Report =3D=3D> > Generates a bug-report *mail* buffer with a field; TO: > help-emacs-windows@gnu.org > > I therefor accepted this as the desired (and presumably previously > agreed upon) protocol. This is at least where I want you to send the bug report. > Are the aforementioned behaviors of these Lennart builds incorrect? > If so, _I_ am _NOT_ the only person whom needs to be politely informed > of the correct means with which to file a bug report when using > Lennart builds of Emacs-w32. No, we all need that help for our first bug report in a new situation ... ;= -) > *** FWIW: The cruxt of _my_ user error involved me kill/pasting from > Emacs' bug-report *mail* buffer into a gmail web-interface and hitting > send without checking that everything was yanked/copied correctly. Did you notice that there is a little program called gAttach that can make gmail:s web interface act as the default mail client on w32? From cyd@stupidchicken.com Fri Apr 3 16:17:51 2009 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 3 Apr 2009 23:17:52 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=4.0 tests=CLOSE,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n33NHnl6032089 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:17:50 -0700 Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4068957E245; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 19:19:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: close Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:19:26 -0400 Message-ID: <87fxgpxr41.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii close 2882 close 2883 reassign 2884 spam thanks From rgm@gnu.org Mon Apr 6 19:32:22 2009 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 7 Apr 2009 02:32:22 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.0 tests=MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n372WJeX004942 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 19:32:21 -0700 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Lr16p-0001TO-1U; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:32:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18906.47922.961917.469812@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 22:32:18 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: control Subject: control message merge 2879 2880 2882 2883 reassign 2879 notemacs tags 2816 - patch merge 2912 2913 From unknown Sun Jun 22 00:10:39 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: $requester Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 14:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # A New Hope # A log time ago, in a galaxy far, far away # something happened. # # Magically this resulted in the following # action being taken, but this fake control # message doesn't tell you why it happened # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 25 18:43:56 2010 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2010 23:43:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZYb3-0000zi-Q1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:43:55 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZYb1-0000zZ-U4 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:43:52 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZYay-0003H1-62; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:43:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19294.11444.144643.852520@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:43:48 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control Subject: control X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: white X-Ran: )2IvCev*F]B:b;_T~Nc[]hz\Q)NP.:"VUKJAH\{fTB14^-=bf-59X"/$We:(GYvWJo4<~B X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) tags 2877 moreinfo unarchive 2883 unmerge 2883 unmerge 2880 From unknown Sun Jun 22 00:10:39 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # A New Hope # A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away # something happened. # # Magically this resulted in the following # action being taken, but this fake control # message doesn't tell you why it happened # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator