GNU bug report logs - #28806
syntax highlighting in ox-odt and emacs26+ broken

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jay Kamat <jaygkamat <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 06:30:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Merged with 31718, 31734

Found in version 26.1

Done: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #14 received at 28806 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: pierre.techoueyres <at> free.fr (Pierre Téchoueyres)
Cc: 28806 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jaygkamat <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#28806: syntax highlighting in ox-odt and emacs26+ broken
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 10:57:05 +0200
> From: pierre.techoueyres <at> free.fr (Pierre Téchoueyres)
> Cc: Jay Kamat <jaygkamat <at> gmail.com>,  28806 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:03:31 +0100
> 
> > Having read all of the references and discussions you've provided, I
> > see no evidence that this is an Emacs issue, as opposed to an Org
> > issue.  I think the Org developers should take a look at this first,
> > and only if they provide clear evidence that the problem is due to
> > Emacs, should the problem come here.
> >
> 
> Hi Eli,
> I don't know if you noticed it but the fact that the uncompiled version
> is working as expected or that an compiled one with an older emacs
> (version 25 for example) tend to indicate a problem on the emacs side.
> 
> I can also add that forcing reevaluation of
> `org-odt-do-format-code' solve the problem.
> 
> Can this be considered as an evidence that the problem is on the emacs
> side ?

No, I don't think so.  All of the above can be the result of some Org
specific problem.  That's why I suggested that the Org developers look
into this issue first.




This bug report was last modified 6 years and 342 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.