GNU bug report logs - #28765
[PATCH] config: Conditionally configure daemon offload script.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Eric Bavier <ericbavier <at> centurylink.net>
Cc: Eric Bavier <bavier <at> cray.com>, 28765 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#28765] [PATCH] config: Conditionally configure daemon offload script.
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:49:49 +0200

Hello,

Eric Bavier <ericbavier <at> centurylink.net> skribis:

> On Mon, 09 Oct 2017 23:07:10 +0200
> ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> Eric Bavier <bavier <at> cray.com> skribis:
>> 
>> > From 984e324370c2c17d8d1a982adf2884112c9e64b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Eric Bavier <bavier <at> cray.com>
>> > Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 13:58:04 -0500
>> > Subject: [PATCH] config: Conditionally configure daemon offload script.  
>>                    ^
>> Nitpick: rather “build:”, which is for all things build-related.
>> 
>> > * config-daemon.ac (nix/scripts/offload): Configure only if offloading enabled.  
>> 
>> It LGTM, but is it helpful?  guix-daemon does not invoke ‘guix offload’
>> when it’s missing, as can be seen in guix-daemon.cc:
>> 
>>   #ifdef HAVE_DAEMON_OFFLOAD_HOOK
>>         /* Use our build hook for distributed builds by default.  */
>>   …
>
> Or maybe something like this would be preferable, to avoid exporting
> NIX_BUILD_HOOK if Guix has been configured to disable the daemon
> offload hook?
>
> --- a/build-aux/pre-inst-env.in
> +++ b/build-aux/pre-inst-env.in
> @@ -50,13 +50,9 @@ NIX_LIBEXEC_DIR="@abs_top_builddir@/nix/scripts" # for 'guix-authenticate'
>  export NIX_ROOT_FINDER NIX_SUBSTITUTERS NIX_LIBEXEC_DIR
>  
>  NIX_BUILD_HOOK="$abs_top_builddir/nix/scripts/offload"
> -if [ -x "$NIX_BUILD_HOOK" ]
> -then
> -    export NIX_BUILD_HOOK
> -else
> -    # No offloading support.
> -    unset NIX_BUILD_HOOK
> -fi
> +@BUILD_DAEMON_OFFLOAD_TRUE <at> export NIX_BUILD_HOOK
> +@BUILD_DAEMON_OFFLOAD_FALSE@# No offloading support.
> +@BUILD_DAEMON_OFFLOAD_FALSE <at> unset NIX_BUILD_HOOK

It’s nicer (you’re welcome to push this change!), but it’s equivalent to
what’s already here, no?

Is there a problem that we are trying to solve in the first place, or is
it more about making things nicer?

Thank you,
Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.