GNU bug report logs - #28757
[PATCH] gnu: postgresql: Update to 10.0.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 28757 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 28757 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Rutger Helling <rhelling <at> mykolab.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: postgresql: Update to 10.0.
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 11:27:20 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hey Guix,

This patch updates postgresql to 10.0.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[0001-gnu-postgresql-Update-to-10.0.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 28757 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Rutger Helling <rhelling <at> mykolab.com>
Cc: 28757 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#28757] [PATCH] gnu: postgresql: Update to 10.0.
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 15:11:32 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 11:27:20AM +0200, Rutger Helling wrote:
> Hey Guix,
> 
> This patch updates postgresql to 10.0.

> From d614dd69136f860ccb089e012cf7013d9e143a21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Rutger Helling <rhelling <at> mykolab.com>
> Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 11:20:34 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: postgresql: Update to 10.0.
> 
> * gnu/packages/databases.scm (postgresql): Update to 10.0.

Thanks!

Do you know if we need to adjust our PostgreSQL service for this new
release?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #11 received at 28757 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Rutger Helling <rhelling <at> mykolab.com>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 28757 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#28757] [PATCH] gnu: postgresql: Update to 10.0.
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:19:13 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hey Leo, 

I don't think so. It still works fine for me at least. 

On 2017-10-09 21:11, Leo Famulari wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 11:27:20AM +0200, Rutger Helling wrote: 
> 
>> Hey Guix,
>> 
>> This patch updates postgresql to 10.0.
> 
>> From d614dd69136f860ccb089e012cf7013d9e143a21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Rutger Helling <rhelling <at> mykolab.com>
>> Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 11:20:34 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: postgresql: Update to 10.0.
>> 
>> * gnu/packages/databases.scm (postgresql): Update to 10.0.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Do you know if we need to adjust our PostgreSQL service for this new
> release?

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #16 received at 28757-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Rutger Helling <rhelling <at> mykolab.com>
Cc: 28757-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#28757] [PATCH] gnu: postgresql: Update to 10.0.
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:33:56 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 08:19:13AM +0200, Rutger Helling wrote:
> Hey Leo, 
> 
> I don't think so. It still works fine for me at least. 

Okay, pushed as 231123ee16b813af2d3c7b95fd800a8d7f25b71a

> 
> On 2017-10-09 21:11, Leo Famulari wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 11:27:20AM +0200, Rutger Helling wrote: 
> > 
> >> Hey Guix,
> >> 
> >> This patch updates postgresql to 10.0.
> > 
> >> From d614dd69136f860ccb089e012cf7013d9e143a21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Rutger Helling <rhelling <at> mykolab.com>
> >> Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 11:20:34 +0200
> >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: postgresql: Update to 10.0.
> >> 
> >> * gnu/packages/databases.scm (postgresql): Update to 10.0.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Do you know if we need to adjust our PostgreSQL service for this new
> > release?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.