GNU bug report logs - #28723
Add HDF-Java. [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add java-slf4-simple.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be>

Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 16:11:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be>
Cc: 28723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#28723] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add hdf-java.
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 15:27:02 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 06:20:42PM +0200, Thomas Danckaert wrote:
> Hi Guix,
> 
> this patch adds hdf-java.
> 
> It's quite ugly, but it seems the autotools build for this package is barely
> working and really needs a lot of patching...  (Actually, using CMake is
> recommended, but then we would have to build the HDF4 and HDF5 packages with
> CMake as well).
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Thomas

> From 619b38cc889bc41e0128f038aa78e54f71fb7dab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Danckaert <thomas.danckaert <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 17:17:03 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add hdf-java.
> 
> * gnu/packages/maths.scm (hdf-java): New variable.

Overall, LGTM...

> +        (add-before 'check 'build-examples
> +          (lambda _
> +            (apply system* `("javac"
> +                             ,@(find-files "examples" ".*\\.java")))
> +            #t)))

Do we have to explicity return #t here? Does the javac call not return
a value that we can pass to (zero? ...)?
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 7 years and 318 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.