GNU bug report logs - #28653
[PATCH] gnu: gnome-calendar: Update to 3.26.1.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org>

Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 05:06:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed, patch

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 28653 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 28653 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#28653; Package guix-patches. (Sat, 30 Sep 2017 05:06:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 30 Sep 2017 05:06:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnome-calendar: Update to 3.26.1.
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:35:21 +0530 (IST)
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
The following warning is not fixed:
(gnome-calendar:8477): Gtk-WARNING **: Could not load a pixbuf from /org/gtk/libgtk/theme/Adwaita/assets/bullet-symbolic.svg.
This may indicate that pixbuf loaders or the mime database could not be found.

Adding gdk-pixbuf[0] as input doesn't seem to fix the issue. Anyway, there seems no
issue so far.

[0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-11/msg00704.html

Thanks
[0001-gnu-gnome-calendar-Update-to-3.26.1.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#28653; Package guix-patches. (Mon, 02 Oct 2017 00:51:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 28653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Kei Kebreau <kkebreau <at> posteo.net>
To: Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org>
Cc: 28653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#28653] [PATCH] gnu: gnome-calendar: Update to 3.26.1.
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 20:50:20 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org> writes:

> The following warning is not fixed:
> (gnome-calendar:8477): Gtk-WARNING **: Could not load a pixbuf from
> /org/gtk/libgtk/theme/Adwaita/assets/bullet-symbolic.svg.
> This may indicate that pixbuf loaders or the mime database could not be found.
>
> Adding gdk-pixbuf[0] as input doesn't seem to fix the issue. Anyway,
> there seems no
> issue so far.
>
> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-11/msg00704.html
>
> Thanks

LGTM! Pushed to master as a49d3e377559fdfd78cd5f90d128dbf4a1654eab.

As for the warning, it appears to happen because of an issue in one of
gnome-calendar's gtk+-related dependencies. We will find out what it is
given some time.

Thank you for contributing!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#28653; Package guix-patches. (Tue, 03 Oct 2017 13:26:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 28653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org>
Cc: 28653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#28653] [PATCH] gnu: gnome-calendar: Update to 3.26.1.
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 15:25:40 +0200
Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org> skribis:

> --- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
> @@ -6065,7 +6065,7 @@ desktop.  It supports world clock, stop watch, alarms, and count down timer.")
>  (define-public gnome-calendar
>    (package
>      (name "gnome-calendar")
> -    (version "3.24.3")
> +    (version "3.26.1")

Is it OK to have a mixture of GNOME 3.24 and 3.26 applications?  (I
thought all GNOME apps/libraries had to be updated in lockstep.)

Ludo’.




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#28653; Package guix-patches. (Tue, 03 Oct 2017 13:59:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 28653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 28653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#28653] [PATCH] gnu: gnome-calendar: Update to 3.26.1.
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 19:28:21 +0530 (IST)
> On October 3, 2017 at 6:55 PM Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Is it OK to have a mixture of GNOME 3.24 and 3.26 applications?  (I
> thought all GNOME apps/libraries had to be updated in lockstep.)
> 

As long as the newly introduced APIs are not used, it is okay.
And the minimum required version should be specified in configure.ac
or meson.build.

So if it builds with an older library, it should also work fine.
If it doesn't work right, it is an upstream bug. The minimum required
dependency version should be updated upstream.

Thanks

> Ludo’.




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#28653; Package guix-patches. (Tue, 03 Oct 2017 19:49:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 28653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org>
Cc: 28653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#28653] [PATCH] gnu: gnome-calendar: Update to 3.26.1.
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 21:48:24 +0200
Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org> skribis:

>> On October 3, 2017 at 6:55 PM Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>> Is it OK to have a mixture of GNOME 3.24 and 3.26 applications?  (I
>> thought all GNOME apps/libraries had to be updated in lockstep.)
>> 
>
> As long as the newly introduced APIs are not used, it is okay.
> And the minimum required version should be specified in configure.ac
> or meson.build.
>
> So if it builds with an older library, it should also work fine.
> If it doesn't work right, it is an upstream bug. The minimum required
> dependency version should be updated upstream.

OK, that makes sense.  Thanks for explaining!

Ludo’.




Added tag(s) fixed. Request was from ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 04 Oct 2017 14:39:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug closed, send any further explanations to 28653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org> Request was from ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 04 Oct 2017 14:39:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 02 Nov 2017 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 7 years and 316 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.