GNU bug report logs -
#28653
[PATCH] gnu: gnome-calendar: Update to 3.26.1.
Previous Next
Reported by: Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 05:06:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: fixed, patch
Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 28653 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 28653 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#28653
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 30 Sep 2017 05:06:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 30 Sep 2017 05:06:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
The following warning is not fixed:
(gnome-calendar:8477): Gtk-WARNING **: Could not load a pixbuf from /org/gtk/libgtk/theme/Adwaita/assets/bullet-symbolic.svg.
This may indicate that pixbuf loaders or the mime database could not be found.
Adding gdk-pixbuf[0] as input doesn't seem to fix the issue. Anyway, there seems no
issue so far.
[0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-11/msg00704.html
Thanks
[0001-gnu-gnome-calendar-Update-to-3.26.1.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#28653
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 02 Oct 2017 00:51:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 28653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org> writes:
> The following warning is not fixed:
> (gnome-calendar:8477): Gtk-WARNING **: Could not load a pixbuf from
> /org/gtk/libgtk/theme/Adwaita/assets/bullet-symbolic.svg.
> This may indicate that pixbuf loaders or the mime database could not be found.
>
> Adding gdk-pixbuf[0] as input doesn't seem to fix the issue. Anyway,
> there seems no
> issue so far.
>
> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-11/msg00704.html
>
> Thanks
LGTM! Pushed to master as a49d3e377559fdfd78cd5f90d128dbf4a1654eab.
As for the warning, it appears to happen because of an issue in one of
gnome-calendar's gtk+-related dependencies. We will find out what it is
given some time.
Thank you for contributing!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#28653
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 03 Oct 2017 13:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 28653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org> skribis:
> --- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
> @@ -6065,7 +6065,7 @@ desktop. It supports world clock, stop watch, alarms, and count down timer.")
> (define-public gnome-calendar
> (package
> (name "gnome-calendar")
> - (version "3.24.3")
> + (version "3.26.1")
Is it OK to have a mixture of GNOME 3.24 and 3.26 applications? (I
thought all GNOME apps/libraries had to be updated in lockstep.)
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#28653
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 03 Oct 2017 13:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 28653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> On October 3, 2017 at 6:55 PM Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Is it OK to have a mixture of GNOME 3.24 and 3.26 applications? (I
> thought all GNOME apps/libraries had to be updated in lockstep.)
>
As long as the newly introduced APIs are not used, it is okay.
And the minimum required version should be specified in configure.ac
or meson.build.
So if it builds with an older library, it should also work fine.
If it doesn't work right, it is an upstream bug. The minimum required
dependency version should be updated upstream.
Thanks
> Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#28653
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 03 Oct 2017 19:49:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 28653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org> skribis:
>> On October 3, 2017 at 6:55 PM Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>> Is it OK to have a mixture of GNOME 3.24 and 3.26 applications? (I
>> thought all GNOME apps/libraries had to be updated in lockstep.)
>>
>
> As long as the newly introduced APIs are not used, it is okay.
> And the minimum required version should be specified in configure.ac
> or meson.build.
>
> So if it builds with an older library, it should also work fine.
> If it doesn't work right, it is an upstream bug. The minimum required
> dependency version should be updated upstream.
OK, that makes sense. Thanks for explaining!
Ludo’.
Added tag(s) fixed.
Request was from
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 04 Oct 2017 14:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug closed, send any further explanations to
28653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Mohammed Sadiq <sadiq <at> sadiqpk.org>
Request was from
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 04 Oct 2017 14:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 02 Nov 2017 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 316 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.