GNU bug report logs - #28523
25.3; Unable to run 64-bit GNU Emacs 25.3 on Windows 7

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: 张鸥 <seagle0128 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 05:31:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed

Merged with 28532, 28549, 28553

Found in version 25.3

Fixed in version 25.3.1

Done: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #19 received at 28523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>
To: Chris Zheng <chriszheng99 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 张鸥 <seagle0128 <at> gmail.com>, 28523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#28523: 25.3; Unable to run 64-bit GNU Emacs 25.3 on Windows 7
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:13:33 -0400
tags 28523 fixed
close 28523 25.3.1
quit

This is fixed now with the 25.3.1 release, see
https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-25.3_1.readme.

Chris Zheng <chriszheng99 <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
>> Now I have to use the 3rd-party build from
>
>> https://github.com/zklhp/emacs-w64/releases/download/e0284ab/emacs-w64-25.3-O2-with-modules.7z,
>
>> which is much smaller than the official one. I am so confusing :(
>
> I build it with optimization, as the name “O2” suggested. And I use
> a higher compression level. There is nothing wrong with the size.

Indeed, a "solid archive" format like .7z will always be much smaller
for collections of many files than a format using per-file compression
like .zip.  And also it uses a more effective algorithm by default.  You
should rather compare sizes after decompressing.

By the way, the official builds should also be built with O2.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 209 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.