Subject: Re: bug#28461: erreurs

From: Jim Meyering <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 20:44:30 -0700

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Pádraig Brady <[email-masked]> wrote:
...
> That's a good improvement!

Indeed!

> <bikeshedding>
> I'd change:
>
> s/missing more parameters after/missing parameter after/

Or, perhaps use wording similar to what test does:

  ..._("missing argument after %s")