GNU bug report logs - #28446
linux-libre@4.1 should select 4.1.x, not 4.13.x

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>

Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:08:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#28446: closed (linux-libre <at> 4.1 should select 4.1.x, not 4.13.x)
Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 11:32:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 13 May 2018 13:31:08 +0200
with message-id <87zi13lrlv.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#28446: linux-libre <at> 4.1 should select 4.1.x, not 4.13.x
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #28446,
regarding linux-libre <at> 4.1 should select 4.1.x, not 4.13.x
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
28446: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=28446
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: linux-libre <at> 4.1 should select 4.1.x, not 4.13.x
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:07:32 -0400
Currently, the package specification "linux-libre <at> 4.1" selects version
4.13.  It should instead select version 4.1.

      Mark


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>, 28446-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#28446: linux-libre <at> 4.1 should select 4.1.x, not 4.13.x
Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 13:31:08 +0200
Hello,

Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> skribis:

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> writes:
>
>>> Currently, the package specification "linux-libre <at> 4.1" selects version
>>> 4.13.  It should instead select version 4.1.
>>
>> We consider everthing following the “@” a version string prefix.  Since
>> versions are arbitrary strings “4.1” is considered a valid prefix of
>> “4.13”.  If a user supplied the version string “4.1.” they would get the
>> appropriate package.

I pushed a fix that I think does what we want as
348987d3d12ebaf11fdbcc3dbd56585e7d69a1f5.

Basically ‘version-prefix?’ splits a version string at dots and compares
whole components.

Thanks,
Ludo’.


This bug report was last modified 7 years and 68 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.