GNU bug report logs -
#2844
infinite loop in boyer_moore()
Previous Next
Reported by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva <at> gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 20:15:03 UTC
Severity: serious
Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:42:24 -0400
with message-id <87fxg8btq7.fsf <at> cyd.mit.edu>
and subject line Re: infinite loop in boyer_moore()
has caused the Emacs bug report #2844,
regarding infinite loop in boyer_moore()
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org
immediately.)
--
2844: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=2844
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492504
Gnus has been entering infinite loops for me while splitting mail. Today I got
a chance to look into it. The problem is in boyer_moore(), in search.c:
/* Use signed comparison if appropriate
to make cursor+infinity sure to be > p_limit.
Assuming that the buffer lies in a range of addresses
that are all "positive" (as ints) or all "negative",
either kind of comparison will work as long
as we don't step by infinity. So pick the kind
that works when we do step by infinity. */
if ((EMACS_INT) (p_limit + infinity) > (EMACS_INT) p_limit)
while ((EMACS_INT) cursor <= (EMACS_INT) p_limit)
cursor += BM_tab[*cursor];
else
while ((EMACS_UINT) cursor <= (EMACS_UINT) p_limit)
cursor += BM_tab[*cursor];
it takes the signed (EMACS_INT) loop, but that fails because cursor is
(unsigned char *) 0x7fffc440, whereas p_limit is (unsigned char *) 0x80001260.
infinity, computed earlier in that function, is 0x37dac21, but I don't see how
a positive value would have helped. It seems to me that we have to check that
we won't be crossing this boundary starting at cursor rather than p_limit, or
maybe both. I haven't thought much about it.
I suppose checking that
(EMACS_INT)(cursor + 20000) > (EMACS_INT)(cursor)
would also be necessary before choosing the EMACS_INT variant of the loop.
In GNU Emacs 22.3.1 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.14.7)
of 2009-02-09 on x86-5.fedora.phx.redhat.com
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10503000
configured using `configure '--build=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' '--host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' '--target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' '--program-prefix=' '--prefix=/usr' '--exec-prefix=/usr' '--bindir=/usr/bin' '--sbindir=/usr/sbin' '--sysconfdir=/etc' '--datadir=/usr/share' '--includedir=/usr/include' '--libdir=/usr/lib' '--libexecdir=/usr/libexec' '--localstatedir=/var' '--sharedstatedir=/usr/com' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--with-x-toolkit=gtk' 'build_alias=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' 'host_alias=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' 'target_alias=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=-DMAIL_USE_LOCKF -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables''
Important settings:
value of $LC_ALL: nil
value of $LC_COLLATE: nil
value of $LC_CTYPE: nil
value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil
value of $LC_MONETARY: nil
value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil
value of $LC_TIME: nil
value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8
locale-coding-system: utf-8
default-enable-multibyte-characters: t
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> writes:
>> Ping. Anyone have an opinion?
>
> I've now checked in a fix.
>
> Andreas.
Thanks.
This bug report was last modified 16 years and 36 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.