GNU bug report logs - #28404
The complete Google Noto Fonts

Previous Next

Full log

Message #34 received at 28404 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 28404 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#28404: The complete Google Noto Fonts
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 16:23:07 +0100

Hi,

This patch #28404 series [1] is about a font.  The last comment is from
late 2017.


1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/28404>


On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 at 12:25, ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org> wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.3K bytes:
>> ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org> skribis:
>>
>> > I propose:
>> >
>> > 1. package nototools.
>
> Proposed for QA in bug#28594

This #28594 had been closed,

        Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:59:03 +0000
        (4 years, 6 weeks, 3 days ago)

but…

>> > 2. noto-emoji -> use tagged tarball
>> >    2.1 split emoji into the provided fonts of upstream
>> >        which are emoji and color emoji, separate
>> >        packages.
>> > 3. noto-cjk: likewise
>> > 4. noto: likewise
>>
>> Sounds like a plan!

…some parts of the plan are still missing. :-)


The primary author is not responding since years.  What do we do for the
patch series?  On one hand, piece of work had already been done and on
the other hand, other piece of work is still missing.

Is someone interested in helping to clean the work already done for
easing the merge?


Cheers,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.