GNU bug report logs - #28350
CVE-2017-14482: enriched.el code execution

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: charles <at> aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli)

Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:26:01 UTC

Severity: important

Tags: security

Found in versions 25.1, 23.1, 21.4, 23.2, 21.2, 22.3, 24.3, 21.1, 21.3, 24.1, 24.5, 25.2, 24.2, 23.4, 22.1, 23.3, 24.4, 22.2

Fixed in version 25.3

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #45 received at 28350 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: charles <at> aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli)
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 28350 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: enriched.el code execution
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:54:13 +0200
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
> Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 15:43:30 -0700
> 
> Thanks for reporting this bug. Since it is a serious security hole I have 
> installed a patch by Lars Ingebrigtsen that temporarily disables the problematic 
> translations, and that also changes Gnus to not call enriched-decode. For the 
> emacs-25 branch the patch is here:
> 
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?h=emacs-25&id=9ad0fcc54442a9a01d41be19880250783426db70
> 
> and for the master branch the patch is here:
> 
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=19584f13b1e2e4a778602a8302619ef5c675e68b
> 
> As this patch is merely a workaround to close the security hole, I am not 
> marking the underlying bug as fixed.
> 
> Thank you for reporting the problem.

Thanks for these fixes.  I have some comments:

> branch: master
> commit 19584f13b1e2e4a778602a8302619ef5c675e68b
> Author: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
> Commit: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
>
> [...]
>
> --- a/lisp/textmodes/enriched.el
> +++ b/lisp/textmodes/enriched.el
> @@ -117,12 +117,7 @@ expression, which is evaluated to get the string to insert.")
>  		   (full        "flushboth")
>  		   (center      "center"))
>      (PARAMETER     (t           "param")) ; Argument of preceding annotation
> -    ;; The following are not part of the standard:
> -    (FUNCTION      (enriched-decode-foreground "x-color")
> -		   (enriched-decode-background "x-bg-color")

Do we know that "x-color" and/or "x-bg-color" are vulnerable to a
similar misuse as "x-display"?  If not, I can still re-add them at a
later time.

> branch: emacs-25
> commit b6389930146882a77c22901a4357e287826fc7ff
> Author: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
> Commit: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
>
> [...]
>
> +** Enriched text mode no longer supports the 'FUNCTION' and 'display'
> +translations, and Gnus no longer processes enriched text when
> +inlining.  This fixes bugs introduced in Emacs 19.29.  To work around
> +these bugs in Emacs versions 19.29 through 25.2, append the following
> +to your ~/.emacs file:
> +
> +  (provide 'enriched)
> +  (defun enriched-mode (&optional arg))
> +  (defun enriched-decode (from to))

This fix is very safe, at the cost of disabling Enriched mode.  Could
we do any better?  I had suggested the following (in
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=28350#16):

  (eval-after-load "enriched"
    '(defun enriched-decode-display-prop (start end &optional param)
       (list start end)))

But it may not work in Emacs earlier than 23 (I can't test it).




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 245 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.