From unknown Tue Aug 19 10:00:41 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#28326 <28326@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#28326 <28326@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: exiv2 0.26 hash mismatch Reply-To: bug#28326 <28326@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 17:00:41 +0000 retitle 28326 exiv2 0.26 hash mismatch reassign 28326 guix submitter 28326 Maxim Cournoyer severity 28326 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 02 01:51:44 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2017 05:51:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41171 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1do1LH-00082d-T7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 01:51:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39962) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1do1LF-00082P-KJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 01:51:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1do1L5-00052Z-Iq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 01:51:32 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:53625) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1do1L5-00052E-FK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 01:51:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1do1L0-0005IA-Dj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 01:51:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1do1Kv-0004er-Gs for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 01:51:22 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::231]:37800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1do1Kv-0004dX-B2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 01:51:17 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-x231.google.com with SMTP id k189so666720itk.0 for ; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 22:51:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=nAdpbMrAXt11bWIKddmffK1kRGkl39m5E4nBAsVr9A8=; b=uLCxOLBjt8vErssUxqVjvZDrBvh5HiuHz+uvB6Tu/6nOx6YM5Hu1TBcFNDePnoOBCz hx4YY9sVPemOr8cY/9mCAuE6M5+R7iJK6LyeWnrvADN6xeylOszibD19xtP+0PpQ+I0a 3m1ZizAJJIOLLIifFe/O65xS+bvISJMZEqcWTVaVQNLmFkdUByvwE+fC9ITvM+RZ/Q3p S9yFgIeM4eup7kzFfY2c3pesBa1GDKGWaw8p4nO7gj0pp3cumZ82QdB9gUBUSICV7EVm RieDUDIDVrOUk3IdVIu7qksP5J858WOxWuG6ohpU0s+b7UavqvlQXBBEbaotlkDMZlOY FHhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=nAdpbMrAXt11bWIKddmffK1kRGkl39m5E4nBAsVr9A8=; b=ZPVjWHT3q0QyW4oVcdElO1nRtLkUOxB4WonwWvK3aKP1bJUrt2ba4CHsowdA+PxR3R QD5cwaBaJr2UPEJbwUvz1+xOwS98PfPEaABLNa63EzNRsTN8e/ynM5ZvUBced5Dvccg/ iPJx2xYkDNKdexF96P1OVvBpFPZhBCOdluYCAzRfcjZfWrqXpj38KWrpbQkufbijuQ3Y 8hsNjb7HjRU9ih0asu6Z9l+61eLMLUV+QWiCdwDjoikbRl/Du9733BaQuOXZDFSioTqI VzagkpE21GKtmXsai+KuEreGWzC5qZ4sN+t0JOWKj+JqJwVRUoPNWmu8k2NHjuexHC9O C+Lw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgTVKUa8I2mDqTfjp531K/jBeOl6Vg9GCgxaPiTUTTxRIZ2Ocn7 jVmb++cPLRsaTMgo X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb6R4VsMpT8G1hP3H7ZLQEZElzhjnw40xN0q8FGBunr32OyftHuNbIXxOYWyl1mwnE26Vly+5Q== X-Received: by 10.36.107.145 with SMTP id v139mr324038itc.41.1504331476357; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 22:51:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apteryx ([45.72.233.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f140sm1031718ioe.27.2017.09.01.22.51.15 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 01 Sep 2017 22:51:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: bug-guix Subject: exiv2 0.26 hash mismatch Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 01:51:14 -0400 Message-ID: <87fuc5wsvh.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) tl;dr: exiv2 source archive was updated in-place and the verification below gives us confidence that we can safely update the hash. On current master, the following happens: $ guix build exiv2 Starting download of /gnu/store/jcapi6vk4a14hch5jgsh5zps958g91sb-exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz >From http://www.exiv2.org/builds/exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz... [...] sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/jcapi6vk4a14hch5jgsh5zps958g91sb-exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz' expected: 1hsdzlzgkipprqh93yj81mrckl2l7c2mn2i84691pallnjz5qqhc actual: 1yza317qxd8yshvqnay164imm0ks7cvij8y8j86p1gqi1153qpn7 Looking at what happened at the source obtained through the Wayback Machine at the time it was last updated in Guix[1] compared to now[2], we see that: 1. The project maintainers updated the MD5 and filesize of the file "exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz", which name and URL remained unchanged. Let's validate those weak MD5 hashes: $ md5sum exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz # old one f936d2ca5cbe1e18c71ca2baa5e84fb4 exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz $ md5sum exiv2-0.26-trunk\(1\).tar.gz # new one 5399e3b570d7f9205f0e76d47582da4c exiv2-0.26-trunk(1).tar.gz OK, at least the advertized signature validates. 2. When extracting those two archives and diffing them, we see the changes: $ diff -ur exiv2-trunk-old/ exiv2-trunk-new/ Only in exiv2-trunk-old/: ._AUTHORS Only in exiv2-trunk-old/: ._bootstrap.macports Only in exiv2-trunk-old/: ._bootstrap.mxe Only in exiv2-trunk-old/: ._CMakeLists.txt Only in exiv2-trunk-old/: ._CMake_msvc.txt Only in exiv2-trunk-old/config: ._aclocal.m4 Only in exiv2-trunk-old/config: ._CMakeChecks.txt [...] Only in exiv2-trunk-old/xmpsdk/src: ._XMPMeta-Serialize.cpp Only in exiv2-trunk-old/xmpsdk/src: ._XMPUtils.cpp Only in exiv2-trunk-old/xmpsdk/src: ._XMPUtils-FileInfo.cpp Only in exiv2-trunk-old/xmpsdk/src: ._XMPUtils.hpp Only in exiv2-trunk-old/xmpsdk: ._src Only in exiv2-trunk-old/: ._xmpsdk A pretty harmless cleanup. Still, the practice of updating a release in place is not very good... Upon further digging, the issue was already reported and discussed[3][4]. Note: they are moving to Github and in the furure the releases will be offered directly through Github. Patch will follow. [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20170606065325/http://exiv2.org/download.html [2] http://exiv2.org/download.html [3] http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/1299 [4] https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/19 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 02 01:57:51 2017 Received: (at 28326) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2017 05:57:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41186 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1do1RH-0008BT-Fw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 01:57:51 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173]:36776) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1do1RF-0008BF-7c for 28326@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 01:57:49 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id f99so8520527ioi.3 for <28326@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 22:57:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=WVppwPbHu88t6XGIeNcGT3XXx9WINnxxM1zjeuGb+xU=; b=oQe3ycDRGOw3kReLp2FY7J7bQXCglbxaVru/NP9rdb+RSRZSaU2bCt2CVJKlvEX09A GCbOtOCn+XoWfpbucnnz8ZtFZQszJA0kmBQZ2bRtu3Ed7W2K15m3nG73lLu3oGNl+Kqy eEYnghf4mlUijLfgDYxB7+tKHICWBsqIzi4ZYT6wfZCOd+b+4d/Ng2TTTjvYwQDAtrMU JEEwGs7KHPJ9IMhZ2JhQLcaF5uNqUzkbdTAHgFp/i+CaHmKCkUqdIg0D7QEsHj7zFazC CKtN9Fy8W4fuwFoL4lfn9K1N4ZpdigrKVuE9ajqd1Oe1BlSAsiLKiUSX4mKcGN8tmrbS EGCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=WVppwPbHu88t6XGIeNcGT3XXx9WINnxxM1zjeuGb+xU=; b=mI8A4nJfbzMr2l1Aj4cC4H0TW0Xp6T73ggLQdZItiEaLkNISGB3vCHWJSA19BSby0G r+MOo0ZrOBkuawvN5FV2n57HOGA16aEdDJBpWgIJ7jdieAsLT/EDcqEbGyjurTkcgoTK 7VPWGpJ8NwoDadh1dK9TojzVg7wrefrghNrKnLOzpWT8PEHRgjvrTMFbHDTh+Q94KZOs XiH51FJjlt7UWfqLWgymVGvmb4aF0E6Rm1cbP3CRLSrBuI01faHgzPiVCtfwUjlU1o2u bQs3/oiLw7Sd5Fs83NuQTXFs8dyqORXGTLwd1QM1jxwOlaglApF3CTKBp3L+JFraMwj2 XO6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjSu0VmJfRuAet0OdcTlri07mY/BgjmjxWyE0xiPkLAjeGb+Wj7 QzU4ui6xM2sF4+I/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb4ojRAXFvRDz515014SvodkMZLMLBWFaHWjPc7PVfpKOmxP93NUnigHlMBwCEA3PVl21JMeMQ== X-Received: by 10.107.9.209 with SMTP id 78mr3263934ioj.99.1504331863406; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 22:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apteryx ([45.72.233.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q133sm972476iod.44.2017.09.01.22.57.42 for <28326@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 01 Sep 2017 22:57:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: 28326@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] Re: bug#28326: Acknowledgement (exiv2 0.26 hash mismatch) References: <87fuc5wsvh.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 01:57:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: (GNU bug Tracking System's message of "Sat, 02 Sep 2017 05:52:03 +0000") Message-ID: <87a82dwskq.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 28326 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Here's the updated hash. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-gnu-Update-the-hash-of-the-exiv2-package.patch >From ea55dd50570e8c16e124cfefe6c7f1cf33e706b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maxim Cournoyer Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 01:45:24 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update the hash of the exiv2 package. The source archive was updated in place; only a cleanup of non functional files was done (see: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=28326). * gnu/packages/image.scm (exiv2): Update hash. --- gnu/packages/image.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/image.scm b/gnu/packages/image.scm index e93248199..503a249a9 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/image.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/image.scm @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ channels.") version ".tar.gz"))) (sha256 (base32 - "1hsdzlzgkipprqh93yj81mrckl2l7c2mn2i84691pallnjz5qqhc")))) + "1yza317qxd8yshvqnay164imm0ks7cvij8y8j86p1gqi1153qpn7")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (arguments '(#:tests? #f)) ; no `check' target (propagated-inputs -- 2.13.1 --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 02 06:35:05 2017 Received: (at 28326-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2017 10:35:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41499 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1do5lZ-00068H-7u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 06:35:05 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:42415) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1do5lW-00067w-7d for 28326-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 06:35:03 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833D020B19; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 06:35:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 02 Sep 2017 06:35:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=E6zVgimcwLxfaSeL0T0FRpvugwSKlm+AQk2SF13Iv Uw=; b=Zlquw/+lsZszexyX/Rny+liFFWrwc0K6AUa6ncb7Pjs3VJYjxRZ92tNv0 EGpiVL4R1kgSpa+9/ixCelKmPSSrnyLt2IAKzWFMIw1KIt+TJeG4oVsE6WbWAtIa AZOnx55ttkFoh0dR3u7yiqywmR7LknVVHbo45OVPDL7DNRIngxv+XjAGCK0yN4o5 9cdl5I60X1Xtokh4+432B2tBxCGu7chCn6kUjziL8wo36qHjQgLBuO8MedxAN5LM D8ckAn2h1zR5RYbpf358o+WAQPh9KCgfWEgxFf2BJBzg0XegZMx6eaG7AgsF046V YOSeqSQMyHRRWbR+VqH4DCOFZDbRw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=E6zVgimcwLxfaSeL0T 0FRpvugwSKlm+AQk2SF13IvUw=; b=LwNoT7Hw4nIz9SaQa+3JEeFUym6IC7LprT lU6ojrFDHxBqWeJejlLRe8JsHEGg9F4hHkryXG/qBA0aRjkQKsMGW9+mSAUMr2Cm QVA3MB4Hqenjh9NPrToaDhkwNnEInyjS1QkNj3PWJFFro9wSc6kOIjDHGcSeseFG f3RL9AOHvREmvCVsPIJoZmUWMV8E7qW3zwlAq9ZWfWDn+0D6+67UM846dqUpzReq OSduY8omW0MVC6Rx4GDXrUlZS1egy6QXZ8Un4T4KJjWeP2Y9hL1GzxuSagqqvrFu lNI9Jeg/wmoqoVABsc/9Y3I8pSEw2EKnTnnyoNyplNfZoLvtuVsg== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: AZPaFZJbbhe5I5XHuDoOyAEyHMDsfg6NYNWIliKoJ8+G 1504348501 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.113.81.93]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 08AD77F988; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 06:35:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: Maxim Cournoyer , 28326-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#28326: exiv2 0.26 hash mismatch In-Reply-To: <87fuc5wsvh.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87fuc5wsvh.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.25 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 12:34:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87pob9l770.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 28326-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Maxim Cournoyer writes: > tl;dr: exiv2 source archive was updated in-place and the verification > below gives us confidence that we can safely update the hash. > > On current master, the following happens: > > $ guix build exiv2 > > Starting download of /gnu/store/jcapi6vk4a14hch5jgsh5zps958g91sb-exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz > From http://www.exiv2.org/builds/exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz... > > [...] > > sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/jcapi6vk4a14hch5jgsh5zps958g91sb-exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz' > expected: 1hsdzlzgkipprqh93yj81mrckl2l7c2mn2i84691pallnjz5qqhc > actual: 1yza317qxd8yshvqnay164imm0ks7cvij8y8j86p1gqi1153qpn7 > > Looking at what happened at the source obtained through the Wayback > Machine at the time it was last updated in Guix[1] compared to now[2], we see > that: > > 1. The project maintainers updated the MD5 and filesize of the file > "exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz", which name and URL remained unchanged. > > Let's validate those weak MD5 hashes: > > $ md5sum exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz # old one > f936d2ca5cbe1e18c71ca2baa5e84fb4 exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz > > $ md5sum exiv2-0.26-trunk\(1\).tar.gz # new one > 5399e3b570d7f9205f0e76d47582da4c exiv2-0.26-trunk(1).tar.gz > > OK, at least the advertized signature validates. > > 2. When extracting those two archives and diffing them, we see the changes: > > $ diff -ur exiv2-trunk-old/ exiv2-trunk-new/ > Only in exiv2-trunk-old/: ._AUTHORS > Only in exiv2-trunk-old/: ._bootstrap.macports > Only in exiv2-trunk-old/: ._bootstrap.mxe > Only in exiv2-trunk-old/: ._CMakeLists.txt > Only in exiv2-trunk-old/: ._CMake_msvc.txt > Only in exiv2-trunk-old/config: ._aclocal.m4 > Only in exiv2-trunk-old/config: ._CMakeChecks.txt > [...] > Only in exiv2-trunk-old/xmpsdk/src: ._XMPMeta-Serialize.cpp > Only in exiv2-trunk-old/xmpsdk/src: ._XMPUtils.cpp > Only in exiv2-trunk-old/xmpsdk/src: ._XMPUtils-FileInfo.cpp > Only in exiv2-trunk-old/xmpsdk/src: ._XMPUtils.hpp > Only in exiv2-trunk-old/xmpsdk: ._src > Only in exiv2-trunk-old/: ._xmpsdk > > A pretty harmless cleanup. Still, the practice of updating a release in > place is not very good... Upon further digging, the issue was already > reported and discussed[3][4]. > > Note: they are moving to Github and in the furure the releases will be > offered directly through Github. > > Patch will follow. > > [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20170606065325/http://exiv2.org/download.html > [2] http://exiv2.org/download.html > [3] http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/1299 > [4] https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/19 Hi Maxim, Thanks a lot for the detailed analysis! I've applied the patch with a slightly adjusted commit message. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlmqiVMACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqDeQf/RHWWPny569Fg0waHPBp54YIXCo0LXPZfP29cirPAX2uZxY5ptQxlVgf1 E7u4kCckNo6v/50hJtLr/4WIU9vPpi+SmOKSI+y3uX2xpU53Y4cOJxups3dfbiji cX+xehPuXCZj6eU1BVQArWHC3O2QO4UVKewJ59kZjFnOSZsDS+1rBreMwYOngC6K r3Pd7ai0Upclq9UppqrPF7Xe9Qxx3W7jczlQiJJFuKbFUopijkMt4KbGuxC93TmF fHWdZPfUcGfdq5UagqcJLnL00X5orhlbA0ooxpB0VxKcC4O2vtwt3xVMmRtlveXu nz+8OE74UlQBg+qm2Oka8BotqOQN4w== =lRJP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 02 10:51:57 2017 Received: (at 28326) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2017 14:51:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43614 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1do9m9-00081S-G0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 10:51:57 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:56771) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1do9m7-00081K-Iu for 28326@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 10:51:56 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14EF720C8C; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 10:51:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 02 Sep 2017 10:51:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=NgZkuDDWkz3xB40lUlK8ehKi+V4kzgc/0iylKH jcLTw=; b=PFvbjdzeX7Bq3H7I5Cgj2+gBAGq20sH60OnzKVKXzdZwdQFDDQzRIP PyAK05svgxCFnCQTvDzv1k+B8ZbpK1NabnQ/NRoRhAQkuP/9pF/xmBZws3ExWNeZ HItwtcvhQipjIH+jR3nm6LERqLtKV0rI2Zp077CCynSaOj/D9HE+o= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=NgZkuDDWkz3xB40lUl K8ehKi+V4kzgc/0iylKHjcLTw=; b=caNNeK78E5UVgYq5kClqeJpGlwA4BHQE3w ELrtS8wv5ureW26GSxSMxfZWYiwWeMvbuR4TAC8bVWnfnyjdGlZ9OHfWty2cBNDp jGqHAO4PnM1rjnP+9NUcTd4CXC04hvi4qE3fd0RkKctLJ+UQTI9CjI9sL/KqhPCU mQPN0jh004/A2acHCDHMm+8mg/53I4+dnsfUH+kPyzxiNz4FlEzry3jUa2Tbabom UG2mVaJMmWASVgROJ6CEdw6kN6n38Y73tJxfOuCE1ZS8Smo8ej1eEPGgkVi+cdHe 0WJIwVxFXPVqXwI+1hE1GOORPL/MetmoSZmBnzrRpz6d8ZPX1pyg== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: thEOVoLluuEDVXirbIohRO0zLPvGDRiTaZyshNvJi9jc 1504363914 Received: from localhost (c-73-165-108-70.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.165.108.70]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C75427F96A; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 10:51:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 10:51:50 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#28326: exiv2 0.26 hash mismatch Message-ID: <20170902145150.GA31990@jasmine.lan> References: <87fuc5wsvh.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fuc5wsvh.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 28326 Cc: 28326@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 01:51:14AM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > tl;dr: exiv2 source archive was updated in-place and the verification > below gives us confidence that we can safely update the hash. Thanks for your investigation! > A pretty harmless cleanup. Still, the practice of updating a release in > place is not very good... Upon further digging, the issue was already > reported and discussed[3][4]. >=20 > Note: they are moving to Github and in the furure the releases will be > offered directly through Github. >=20 > Patch will follow. Okay, great! --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlmqxYIACgkQJkb6MLrK fwi2BA/9Ej+G0G/qSQy2tBMGr/yg1zL4hmXybyKiylfeCg2mEPo5yUoqDD43Jwse p9bashVvnvsqVae274T+UC1UG+yjznHxp7E/60M93y6JCgTQyIpEB1iE39mff3KW b2oS/V0Ii0wqIQhrUUcK9kZuTRILvJLtbMO/T+6xrydzYIB5OGJRpocThL6Wzo0p 2OSCAbUDUmZXWni6sQE8ZiQujEqvRo8HiXSsBISTVDA9A7ndixSxOmY8xuboERSp yI13On8GvJGuhTkjR6cwCqOK0fq7itnDdf+6nrODNub/QuM0e+W+E4wC5hi4Edq+ PvFxcH4duVanWsFmI7sbPWB63um4toYVfnpXBSl5UFCk8DtVHTC20towFOAFYB0G HbSRVKjD+8xs7sn7y44p3apwsaPlq75RAgnqWJ0LkHh2GChUUlWHSvXpOULWMhD+ 88KbGEpjKnjvVZBnZSJlLHJbySBfbC/uj8E1Gk6IE0raMJA4MeacJVNstvXSD24u /RyCPmPCyV0vjwsuTuzrAv7oqrUodOmGnE8Juz/vToj4nwj1zPom0Cn8i2Sm4oFj fnVK9Lkg4F6yEacg9aX0mHcKLhVQaxnHgyD/YmTXHe/ao+R9CAvodcfFTnCuYX3s us7OK1OLJJ6A+2BkHmO5s0hGSSWQ1P5UttgfGP+TF7TYd7hxmGo= =yPNv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 02 17:35:04 2017 Received: (at 28326) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2017 21:35:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44099 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1doG4F-0002gp-SE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 17:35:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33522) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1doG4E-0002gH-G4 for 28326@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 17:35:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1doG44-0008Sx-AF for 28326@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 17:34:57 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57880) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1doG44-0008Ss-6R; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 17:34:52 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:6a6c:dc17:fc02:cfda] (port=43906 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1doG43-0002x6-IJ; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 17:34:51 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#28326: exiv2 0.26 hash mismatch References: <87fuc5wsvh.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 Fructidor an 225 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 23:34:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87fuc5wsvh.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Sat, 02 Sep 2017 01:51:14 -0400") Message-ID: <871snovl6u.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 28326 Cc: 28326@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/jcapi6vk4a14hch5jgsh5zps= 958g91sb-exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz' > expected: 1hsdzlzgkipprqh93yj81mrckl2l7c2mn2i84691pallnjz5qqhc > actual: 1yza317qxd8yshvqnay164imm0ks7cvij8y8j86p1gqi1153qpn7 > > Looking at what happened at the source obtained through the Wayback > Machine at the time it was last updated in Guix[1] compared to now[2], we= see > that: For the record, as an alternative to the Wayback Machine, you can use: wget https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz/sha256/1hs= dzlzgkipprqh93yj81mrckl2l7c2mn2i84691pallnjz5qqhc Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 04 09:52:55 2017 Received: (at 28326) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2017 13:52:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48082 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1doro7-0003DW-EO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 09:52:55 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:34179) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1doro6-0003DJ-GI for 28326@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 09:52:54 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f46.google.com with SMTP id f199so9552802ita.1 for <28326@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 06:52:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AsT2vyTvIg+i8hVlanUKGYhoOdNcHAeN9UjKvvRV+h0=; b=N6xuyNdqA9JYfqNKN02P563bX0NdtTWH5m79EfRiB9gqBFfTLTksApVWy0YOZ/nrZj P7jF7U05eul8RULvItXkxg+UNeXnzZcDgbGh8ztwMuatnx64JR84AhtUfRddb4OO+fCH 2L9cUFis2ph0xPyNcdPw8fNcmhqTvmRQzZRPrt9R+0Y0ocN5zFkaXyFWXkUqqcqs5HB6 lrT5m4zh4bTc5V+USiy+Z4Vp5k6la7S3kRLsYHmXC5WvOxhvlrnK3Ofu/5LdgKn3MBQV D4o3qOBojLNYRscP51DhN/aZApU65CnMrEkrXN17lac24CFlOZODIDvi/JvQT+ePJQK1 fX+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AsT2vyTvIg+i8hVlanUKGYhoOdNcHAeN9UjKvvRV+h0=; b=YzXBlprVe7YSW8G5kKUTnUJt57uzppoB6JODxKwvbbpq4SLEH45fOxNeleKHJeumG1 iYT8DOAPC3u5cBsZlPGwQAmLzO6qvHOj+xYXbHYWZ1cVRCC1/yF8+wykbBdHEPkmzBIJ a1mm7//Ixnx3pHkOuI2U6gHKq4YET4DLzceJOLo0Zx3ND2iMXdDFQyL5cx3oKMUAnoiZ Xk8yeCuiJCMWZQKLc25spaqNe8VWOteG0ldd/jyk0c9jQg2iOtKnXtGlgXzlgEI7cRfA 9lr+bwVX3dRHF35bL9iU7VlSl1HMnctScS/ODFPU6oOnvo2lLQVb8SUijRhRnLXP0Ha3 hzjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjJG/EioKATZySbEIeFIpJ6pia98OZ9HXV2q+LXp9dSIZv0UVN4 OgZ2oDZFsJu4wSeY X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb6bKfG7D9d3yk+KrnQuDKW6wTmVNr1lrHGnYyKeN+vRTHDRQiXIWHDnQeEf5tcoCpJS4Depmg== X-Received: by 10.36.2.136 with SMTP id 130mr541495itu.83.1504533168563; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 06:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apteryx ([45.72.233.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b64sm309866itd.10.2017.09.04.06.52.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 04 Sep 2017 06:52:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: bug#28326: exiv2 0.26 hash mismatch References: <87fuc5wsvh.fsf@gmail.com> <871snovl6u.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 09:52:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871snovl6u.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sat, 02 Sep 2017 23:34:49 +0200") Message-ID: <8737828tao.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 28326 Cc: 28326@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > >> sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/jcapi6vk4a14hch5jgsh5zp= s958g91sb-exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz' >> expected: 1hsdzlzgkipprqh93yj81mrckl2l7c2mn2i84691pallnjz5qqhc >> actual: 1yza317qxd8yshvqnay164imm0ks7cvij8y8j86p1gqi1153qpn7 >> >> Looking at what happened at the source obtained through the Wayback >> Machine at the time it was last updated in Guix[1] compared to now[2], w= e see >> that: > > For the record, as an alternative to the Wayback Machine, you can use: > > wget https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz/sha256/1= hsdzlzgkipprqh93yj81mrckl2l7c2mn2i84691pallnjz5qqhc Thanks for the tip! I actually tried to find a way to download that file from Hydra for the investigation but couldn't figure it out (by using the Hydra web front-end). Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 04 17:51:37 2017 Received: (at 28326) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2017 21:51:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49521 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dozHN-0006C3-Co for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 17:51:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58165) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dozHL-0006Bp-3L for 28326@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 17:51:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dozHB-00060l-CQ for 28326@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 17:51:30 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41143) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dozHB-00060X-93; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 17:51:25 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:426d:6e94:eb6:ccd6] (port=42030 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dozHA-000255-Nq; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 17:51:25 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#28326: exiv2 0.26 hash mismatch References: <87fuc5wsvh.fsf@gmail.com> <871snovl6u.fsf@gnu.org> <8737828tao.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 18 Fructidor an 225 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 23:51:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8737828tao.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Mon, 04 Sep 2017 09:52:47 -0400") Message-ID: <874lsii145.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 28326 Cc: 28326@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> Maxim Cournoyer skribis: >> >>> sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/jcapi6vk4a14hch5jgsh5z= ps958g91sb-exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz' >>> expected: 1hsdzlzgkipprqh93yj81mrckl2l7c2mn2i84691pallnjz5qqhc >>> actual: 1yza317qxd8yshvqnay164imm0ks7cvij8y8j86p1gqi1153qpn7 >>> >>> Looking at what happened at the source obtained through the Wayback >>> Machine at the time it was last updated in Guix[1] compared to now[2], = we see >>> that: >> >> For the record, as an alternative to the Wayback Machine, you can use: >> >> wget https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz/sha256/= 1hsdzlzgkipprqh93yj81mrckl2l7c2mn2i84691pallnjz5qqhc > > Thanks for the tip! I actually tried to find a way to download that file > from Hydra for the investigation but couldn't figure it out (by using > the Hydra web front-end). This URL is implemented by =E2=80=98guix publish=E2=80=99: https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Invoking-guix-publish.= html Not very discoverable I admit! Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 10 22:47:33 2017 Received: (at 28326) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2017 02:47:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60139 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drEl3-0002n4-01 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:47:33 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180]:38703) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drEl1-0002mr-B3 for 28326@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:47:31 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n69so16677611ioi.5 for <28326@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 19:47:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6/+j+OOU9P6ibvNftEjYMIrJup5FLmveCpXkeyrPd8U=; b=cX7X7odKtqEUO2XtV1Nh8DWF0xCtYxIdzGYhBIeBp8rIAWyEcpbFMqF0NlN2W7haa7 IrKXms6+ITySCPUzeDl9KAlFTLeyc/f7YHIxO3DIcD4eF41Gb85hWurpofB1DW8QlDoY d34QMvkwBE140R7FMHoushzkMzLBQ9mA7fuvuiHva8kcaEageiwz89hLR9itb66YKfrz hMRT5LLIrlFnwJWtpfhNE0n/zs7dKb/6EGZiP5FVJPtrr71IuWRsUZC1Ze9Jmi0UhaAZ PA5o3Ji4rcITvW3QZ8Y5FrDU+019bjjlAhnLK0iqqQU+9oXHLdXq377ZvCQ7ENTETLxi 8eLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6/+j+OOU9P6ibvNftEjYMIrJup5FLmveCpXkeyrPd8U=; b=gQQCVpMgxM+ABbUkfDojJqBf536YrUl/BQ9hhN5Kk5PwepEvwZ19hKQ9VEMZSb5Dkv o7A50i9C8NwQ/udmc972Hqqyu4EtjSK82gf5OG9qoc5e+9CQopst8qQ5FKdyJ1UjMhJC psQTjeiVF/p20goRQASLbOpuG1nSmhiCv0F/U0l8Dj4xCGu4bnseit3y1vcsUi2LAIXM xnFkkXlfzBcfXOCYBtT7MJ7oK384L4W9DqTJ7G50HtUn3hTLsYMSz4AHeQgaynHSrlj6 5ArZGXk/YRdMc4jrdjqxN7m73nq5A0Oc+/p7qgSMED950t26RVbTvVNiBy9/YwBALAsd jBdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgulDnG/+L4W42uxq+kq1S/VGN8a7u/hj6S76x/+aTbs8YlikYG vkW1sPjwEkwI6/Ck X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDufWnt3KO7/fyMl/9223l1DwGhSStw31zAMOflEyH8XCvdlJej+HdrURsBmC2/ESGEJmjYrQ== X-Received: by 10.107.18.85 with SMTP id a82mr12781153ioj.251.1505098045424; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 19:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apteryx ([45.72.233.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e95sm3925497iod.30.2017.09.10.19.47.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 10 Sep 2017 19:47:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: bug#28326: exiv2 0.26 hash mismatch References: <87fuc5wsvh.fsf@gmail.com> <871snovl6u.fsf@gnu.org> <8737828tao.fsf@gmail.com> <874lsii145.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:47:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874lsii145.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 04 Sep 2017 23:51:22 +0200") Message-ID: <878thm54ub.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 28326 Cc: 28326@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > >> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> >>> Maxim Cournoyer skribis: >>> >>>> sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/jcapi6vk4a14hch5jgsh5= zps958g91sb-exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz' >>>> expected: 1hsdzlzgkipprqh93yj81mrckl2l7c2mn2i84691pallnjz5qqhc >>>> actual: 1yza317qxd8yshvqnay164imm0ks7cvij8y8j86p1gqi1153qpn7 >>>> >>>> Looking at what happened at the source obtained through the Wayback >>>> Machine at the time it was last updated in Guix[1] compared to now[2],= we see >>>> that: >>> >>> For the record, as an alternative to the Wayback Machine, you can use: >>> >>> wget https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/exiv2-0.26-trunk.tar.gz/sha256= /1hsdzlzgkipprqh93yj81mrckl2l7c2mn2i84691pallnjz5qqhc >> >> Thanks for the tip! I actually tried to find a way to download that file >> from Hydra for the investigation but couldn't figure it out (by using >> the Hydra web front-end). > > This URL is implemented by =E2=80=98guix publish=E2=80=99: > > https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Invoking-guix-publis= h.html > > Not very discoverable I admit! > > Ludo=E2=80=99. I just (re)read it. Neat! Thanks for the pointer. Maxim From unknown Tue Aug 19 10:00:41 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator