GNU bug report logs -
#28274
[PATCH] gnu: Add fold-packages-in-modules.
Previous Next
Reported by: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 07:08:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #16 received at 28274-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> skribis:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 15:20:55 +0200
> ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> Instead of introducing a new procedure, what about simply:
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages.scm b/gnu/packages.scm
>> index 562906178..b4ac6661c 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages.scm
>> @@ -140,17 +140,19 @@ for system '~a'")
>> directory))
>> %load-path)))
>>
>> -(define (fold-packages proc init)
>> - "Call (PROC PACKAGE RESULT) for each available package, using INIT
>> as -the initial value of RESULT. It is guaranteed to never traverse
>> the -same package twice."
>> +(define* (fold-packages proc init
>> + #:optional
>> + (modules (all-modules
>> (%package-module-path))))
>> + "Call (PROC PACKAGE RESULT) for each available package defined in
>> one of +MODULES, using INIT as the initial value of RESULT. It is
>> guaranteed to never +traverse the same package twice."
>> (fold-module-public-variables (lambda (object result)
>> (if (and (package? object)
>> (not (hidden-package?
>> object))) (proc object result)
>> result))
>> init
>> - (all-modules
>> (%package-module-path))))
>> + modules))
>>
>> (define find-packages-by-name
>> (let ((packages (delay
>>
>>
>> ?
>
> This looks great. Are you set to push it up, or shall I?
Pushed, thanks!
Ludo'.
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 348 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.