GNU bug report logs - #28274
[PATCH] gnu: Add fold-packages-in-modules.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>

Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 07:08:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: 28274 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#28274] [PATCH] gnu: Add fold-packages-in-modules.
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 22:44:33 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 15:20:55 +0200
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:

> Instead of introducing a new procedure, what about simply:
> 
> 
> diff --git a/gnu/packages.scm b/gnu/packages.scm
> index 562906178..b4ac6661c 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages.scm
> @@ -140,17 +140,19 @@ for system '~a'")
>                directory))
>          %load-path)))
>  
> -(define (fold-packages proc init)
> -  "Call (PROC PACKAGE RESULT) for each available package, using INIT
> as -the initial value of RESULT.  It is guaranteed to never traverse
> the -same package twice."
> +(define* (fold-packages proc init
> +                        #:optional
> +                        (modules (all-modules
> (%package-module-path))))
> +  "Call (PROC PACKAGE RESULT) for each available package defined in
> one of +MODULES, using INIT as the initial value of RESULT.  It is
> guaranteed to never +traverse the same package twice."
>    (fold-module-public-variables (lambda (object result)
>                                    (if (and (package? object)
>                                             (not (hidden-package?
> object))) (proc object result)
>                                        result))
>                                  init
> -                                (all-modules
> (%package-module-path))))
> +                                modules))
>  
>  (define find-packages-by-name
>    (let ((packages (delay
> 
> 
> ?

This looks great. Are you set to push it up, or shall I?

Thanks,

Chris
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 7 years and 348 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.