GNU bug report logs -
#28274
[PATCH] gnu: Add fold-packages-in-modules.
Previous Next
Reported by: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 07:08:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 15:20:55 +0200
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Instead of introducing a new procedure, what about simply:
>
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages.scm b/gnu/packages.scm
> index 562906178..b4ac6661c 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages.scm
> @@ -140,17 +140,19 @@ for system '~a'")
> directory))
> %load-path)))
>
> -(define (fold-packages proc init)
> - "Call (PROC PACKAGE RESULT) for each available package, using INIT
> as -the initial value of RESULT. It is guaranteed to never traverse
> the -same package twice."
> +(define* (fold-packages proc init
> + #:optional
> + (modules (all-modules
> (%package-module-path))))
> + "Call (PROC PACKAGE RESULT) for each available package defined in
> one of +MODULES, using INIT as the initial value of RESULT. It is
> guaranteed to never +traverse the same package twice."
> (fold-module-public-variables (lambda (object result)
> (if (and (package? object)
> (not (hidden-package?
> object))) (proc object result)
> result))
> init
> - (all-modules
> (%package-module-path))))
> + modules))
>
> (define find-packages-by-name
> (let ((packages (delay
>
>
> ?
This looks great. Are you set to push it up, or shall I?
Thanks,
Chris
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 348 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.