GNU bug report logs - #28272
[PATCH] Improve and upgrade signing-party.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: 28272 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#28272] [PATCH] Improve and upgrade signing-party.
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:14:30 +0200

Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> skribis:

> On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 18:07:01 +0200
> ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> skribis:
>> 
>> > Add several missing dependencies, particularly for the caff tool. It
>> > now runs, but I've been unable to get it working fully yet, possibly
>> > due to problems with the actual sending of the emails.
>> >
>> > Christopher Baines (12):
>> >   gnu: Add perl-moox.
>> >   gnu: Add perl-data-perl.
>> >   gnu: Add perl-moox-handlesvia.
>> >   gnu: Add perl-moox-late.
>> >   gnu: Add perl-convert-binhex.
>> >   gnu: Add perl-mailtools.
>> >   gnu: Add perl-mime-tools.
>> >   gnu: Add perl-net-idn-encode.
>> >   gnu: Add perl-text-template.
>> >   gnu: Add perl-gnupg-interface.
>> >   gnu: Add libmd.
>> >   gnu: Update signing-party.  
>> 
>> At first sight this looks good to me.
>
> Great, thanks for reviewing :)
>
>> Please use ‘license:perl-license’ instead of (package-license perl).
>
> Within (gnu packages perl), it doesn't use a prefix for the licenses
> module. I could switch it to use the license: prefix, or use just
> perl-license within that module. Do you have a preference?

Either way is fine.  My point is: use the ‘perl-license’ binding of
(guix licenses), not (package-license perl).

See the rationale in (guix licenses).

Thanks!

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.