From unknown Wed Sep 10 17:01:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#28266: 25.2; RMAIL FCC coding issue Resent-From: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 28266 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 28266@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.150394683129556 (code B ref -1); Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:01:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2017 19:00:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59679 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dmPGx-0007ge-Cs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:00:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57470) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dmPGv-0007gR-Lq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:00:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmPGp-0007Uf-Mk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:00:24 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:39609) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmPGp-0007US-K5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:00:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmPGo-0000Uk-BY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:00:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmPGl-0007Mr-BG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:00:22 -0400 Received: from sinyavsky.aurox.ch ([37.35.109.145]:51139) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmPGl-0007BB-28 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:00:19 -0400 Received: from sinyavsky.aurox.ch (sinyavsky.aurox.ch [127.0.0.1]) by sinyavsky.aurox.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901B52250F for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: sinyavsky.aurox.ch (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=aurox.ch DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=aurox.ch; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :subject:subject:to:from:from:message-id:date:date; s=dkim; t= 1503946453; x=1504810454; bh=tFFhGLg2PJN9T5Tgo6oo8qrLUtYON0qv4gZ OTKnF6R0=; b=Y82bjC2h+Cf88VNO6VmqJbnx8K32RGdXKPGWygAKI0dV1ChWYmw 5mD6HKE6KEJLbZvf2tyGEQWIHsuW58uD7ZVGC/4eh4a1XmY80OrVJAa+MGqNzRxP 8kD9JdL96NWQBkB7ZzbP2iT22HjDuQ+x/toT26gJU0rzwv1TEMIejBqg= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at test.virtualizor.com Received: from sinyavsky.aurox.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by sinyavsky.aurox.ch (sinyavsky.aurox.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id v5J3uBIwJgAE for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gray (125.85.192.178.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch [178.192.85.125]) by sinyavsky.aurox.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E8BB224FE for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 20:59:58 +0200 Message-Id: From: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) >From emacs -q (25.2 or 26.0.50): M-: (setq mail-user-agent 'sendmail-user-agent) RET C-x m someone@example.com C-n test RET FCC: /tmp/emacs-bug-mbox C-u 2 C-n This is a test mail, containing =E2=80=98=E2=80=99 quotes. C-c C-c transport RET ; On my system, this doesn't actually send the mail, so ; this is the mail-sending system I choose to reproduce ; the issue. In any case, the recipient email doesn't ; really exist so it should be okay to choose this. C-u M-x rmail /tmp/emacs-bug-mbox ; Observe correct message contents. C-x o ; Switch back to the *mail* buffer. C-c C-c y ; Resend it. n ; Open the resent copy. This is RMAIL's copy of the resent mail: ---------- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 20:41:35 +0200 From: charles@localhost (Charles A. Roelli) To: someone@example.com Subject: test Content-type: text/plain; charset=3Dutf-8 This is a test mail, containing ^X^Y quotes. ---------- Notice that the quotes have been converted to ^X/^Y characters (characters have been corrupted). I tested with another non-ASCII character (=C3=A9), and it got converted to \351. The same issue does not occur with the default value of mail-user-agent (`message-user-agent'). From unknown Wed Sep 10 17:01:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#28266: 25.2; RMAIL FCC coding issue Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28266 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) Cc: 28266@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 28266-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28266.150608606630755 (code B ref 28266); Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 28266) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2017 13:14:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52367 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvNmj-0007zz-PX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 09:14:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50554) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvNme-0007zh-UG for 28266@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 09:14:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvNmU-00007I-4a for 28266@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 09:14:15 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37552) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvNmU-00007D-12; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 09:14:10 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4550 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dvNmS-0000mJ-Dz; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 09:14:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:13:58 +0300 Message-Id: <83h8vudgfd.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (charles@aurox.ch) References: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 20:59:58 +0200 > From: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) > > >From emacs -q (25.2 or 26.0.50): > > M-: (setq mail-user-agent 'sendmail-user-agent) RET > C-x m > someone@example.com C-n > test RET > FCC: /tmp/emacs-bug-mbox > C-u 2 C-n > This is a test mail, containing ‘’ quotes. > C-c C-c > transport RET ; On my system, this doesn't actually send the mail, so > ; this is the mail-sending system I choose to reproduce > ; the issue. In any case, the recipient email doesn't > ; really exist so it should be okay to choose this. > C-u M-x rmail /tmp/emacs-bug-mbox ; Observe correct message contents. > C-x o ; Switch back to the *mail* buffer. > C-c C-c y ; Resend it. > n ; Open the resent copy. > > This is RMAIL's copy of the resent mail: > > ---------- > Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 20:41:35 +0200 > From: charles@localhost (Charles A. Roelli) > To: someone@example.com > Subject: test > Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > This is a test mail, containing ^X^Y quotes. > ---------- > > Notice that the quotes have been converted to ^X/^Y > characters (characters have been corrupted). I tested with > another non-ASCII character (é), and it got converted to \351. I cannot reproduce this with the current emacs-26 branch tip. However, in my case, Emacs asked for a suitable coding-system each time I wanted to send a message. Answering UTF-8 produced a valid encoding in both cases. So perhaps the difference, and the reason for a problem you see, is the default encoding in your case, which you didn't show. (In my case, the default is Latin-1.) From unknown Wed Sep 10 17:01:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#28266: 25.2; RMAIL FCC coding issue Resent-From: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28266 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 28266@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 28266-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28266.150610561212080 (code B ref 28266); Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:41:01 +0000 Received: (at 28266) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2017 18:40:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53220 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvSs0-00038l-H5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 14:40:12 -0400 Received: from sinyavsky.aurox.ch ([37.35.109.145]:37967) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvSrx-00038X-JZ for 28266@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 14:40:11 -0400 Received: from sinyavsky.aurox.ch (sinyavsky.aurox.ch [127.0.0.1]) by sinyavsky.aurox.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699582254A for <28266@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: sinyavsky.aurox.ch (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=aurox.ch DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=aurox.ch; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:to:from:from:message-id :date:date; s=dkim; t=1506105222; x=1506969223; bh=49Ly4pfVCTtYz MVdx0SGmxPe4Q+5x3ZNvUcfkmnWISw=; b=b62txJkC2QdyA9+leJVOKqttp+ari anjjCTyugATo2XlUXgQHR6j25AwvlkFoglI9yxz+bgnwoWikilhOmD1OrX/obbvE aZ7sedF21DYBFG8L3MbRdIhIL9LMZUgCKQFrHOEHu7xVySbstCkK/erKyozLiyBK GrsZtUfkXnWX6k= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at test.virtualizor.com Received: from sinyavsky.aurox.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by sinyavsky.aurox.ch (sinyavsky.aurox.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id JXbljEvwEqIf for <28266@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gray (125.85.192.178.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch [178.192.85.125]) by sinyavsky.aurox.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABBE922534; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:33:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:39:45 +0200 Message-Id: From: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) In-reply-to: <83h8vudgfd.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:13:58 +0300) References: <83h8vudgfd.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:13:58 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > I cannot reproduce this with the current emacs-26 branch tip. > However, in my case, Emacs asked for a suitable coding-system each > time I wanted to send a message. Answering UTF-8 produced a valid > encoding in both cases. > > So perhaps the difference, and the reason for a problem you see, is > the default encoding in your case, which you didn't show. (In my > case, the default is Latin-1.) Hmm, I was never queried for a coding system. I've repeated the issue on GNU/Linux with 25.3 and macOS with 25.3 and emacs-26. And I don't set any special locales/language environments: > Important settings: > value of $LANG: en_GB.UTF-8 > locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix From unknown Wed Sep 10 17:01:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#28266: 25.2; RMAIL FCC coding issue Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28266 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) Cc: 28266@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 28266-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28266.150611091419924 (code B ref 28266); Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:09:01 +0000 Received: (at 28266) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2017 20:08:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUFW-0005BH-3J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:08:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40891) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUFT-0005B5-NP for 28266@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:08:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUFJ-0003Cq-UK for 28266@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:08:26 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUFJ-0003Ck-R2; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:08:21 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1074 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUFI-0004Gb-GU; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:08:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 23:08:13 +0300 Message-Id: <83y3p6bioi.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (charles@aurox.ch) References: <83h8vudgfd.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:39:45 +0200 > From: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) > CC: 28266@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:13:58 +0300 > > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > > I cannot reproduce this with the current emacs-26 branch tip. > > However, in my case, Emacs asked for a suitable coding-system each > > time I wanted to send a message. Answering UTF-8 produced a valid > > encoding in both cases. > > > > So perhaps the difference, and the reason for a problem you see, is > > the default encoding in your case, which you didn't show. (In my > > case, the default is Latin-1.) > > Hmm, I was never queried for a coding system. Because your default is UTF-8. This is normal. > I've repeated the issue on GNU/Linux with 25.3 and macOS with 25.3 > and emacs-26. And I don't set any special locales/language > environments: > > > Important settings: > > value of $LANG: en_GB.UTF-8 > > locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix With en_US.UTF-8 on GNU/Linux, using the current emacs-26 branch, I see no problem: both messages are sent with a correct encoding. What happens if you don't visit the FCC file after the first message is sent, only after the second? Do you still see the second message encoded incorrectly? From unknown Wed Sep 10 17:01:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#28266: 25.2; RMAIL FCC coding issue Resent-From: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 08:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28266 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 28266@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 28266-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28266.150624286530114 (code B ref 28266); Sun, 24 Sep 2017 08:48:02 +0000 Received: (at 28266) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2017 08:47:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55165 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dw2Zk-0007pe-PM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 04:47:44 -0400 Received: from sinyavsky.aurox.ch ([37.35.109.145]:39219) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dw2Zj-0007pP-GL for 28266@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 04:47:44 -0400 Received: from sinyavsky.aurox.ch (sinyavsky.aurox.ch [127.0.0.1]) by sinyavsky.aurox.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id E512F22553 for <28266@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 08:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: sinyavsky.aurox.ch (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=aurox.ch DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=aurox.ch; h= references:subject:subject:in-reply-to:to:from:from:message-id :date:date; s=dkim; t=1506242471; x=1507106472; bh=bSbZOzRb/L1eh nPzHbg6kXg63NMpC8mE0dGhPc2ZODo=; b=vTCDz5V1F9e7EspFB6IIIUkIIm3W7 YnWtoDD83P7zsHc9+a+CMFSW5YN1LV9QIywvN69/+UgJGxapJBZg7ci0GgbdbWfb Jc0tegpxgVE2hX7ugdjbEBOTogitV/jP5fB9micVk9Ypw8vZHNGuAvtMICAelfYg JK+s7Cnz7qEs7g= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at test.virtualizor.com Received: from sinyavsky.aurox.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by sinyavsky.aurox.ch (sinyavsky.aurox.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 8jxX4Xfq__er for <28266@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 08:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gray (125.85.192.178.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch [178.192.85.125]) by sinyavsky.aurox.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1015A22545; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 08:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 10:47:29 +0200 Message-Id: From: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) In-reply-to: <83y3p6bioi.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 23:08:13 +0300) References: <83h8vudgfd.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3p6bioi.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 23:08:13 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:39:45 +0200 > > From: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) > > CC: 28266@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:13:58 +0300 > > > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > > > > I cannot reproduce this with the current emacs-26 branch tip. > > > However, in my case, Emacs asked for a suitable coding-system each > > > time I wanted to send a message. Answering UTF-8 produced a valid > > > encoding in both cases. > > > > > > So perhaps the difference, and the reason for a problem you see, is > > > the default encoding in your case, which you didn't show. (In my > > > case, the default is Latin-1.) > > > > Hmm, I was never queried for a coding system. > > Because your default is UTF-8. This is normal. > > > I've repeated the issue on GNU/Linux with 25.3 and macOS with 25.3 > > and emacs-26. And I don't set any special locales/language > > environments: > > > > > Important settings: > > > value of $LANG: en_GB.UTF-8 > > > locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix > > With en_US.UTF-8 on GNU/Linux, using the current emacs-26 branch, I > see no problem: both messages are sent with a correct encoding. Yes, I believe that in my case too, the messages are (or would be) sent with the correct encoding. The encoding issue I mentioned seems to only apply to the saving of the mail buffer into the file specified in the FCC header. > What happens if you don't visit the FCC file after the first message > is sent, only after the second? Do you still see the second message > encoded incorrectly? No, in that case, both messages are encoded correctly. The encoding issue seems to only occur when the buffer is already open. The text of the outgoing mail buffer is inserted into the file specified by the FCC header using "insert-buffer-substring" in function "rmail-output-to-rmail-buffer" (use C-u C-M-x on this function before hitting C-c C-c y to resend the mail). If you switch to "tembuf" (argument to "rmail-output-to-rmail-buffer") in another frame while debugging this function, you can see in the modeline that its coding system is utf-8-unix. Then if you switch to the buffer containing the FCC file, the modeline indicates that it's unibyte. Note also that variable "enable-multibyte-characters" is bound to nil around this call. From unknown Wed Sep 10 17:01:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#28266: 25.2; RMAIL FCC coding issue Resent-From: Alexis Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 12:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28266 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "Charles A. Roelli" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 28266@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 28266-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28266.150625464029397 (code B ref 28266); Sun, 24 Sep 2017 12:04:01 +0000 Received: (at 28266) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2017 12:04:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55273 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dw5dg-0007e5-8y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 08:04:00 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:55282) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dw5de-0007do-Lq for 28266@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 08:03:59 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id c137so2631802pga.11 for <28266@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 05:03:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=jxBjAT668SDmH+lQATFRqC65iZ++T3RpfV08hlDgOSY=; b=YbkOuRn1BfCkG8Ju7Xyke5N1ytQ4pfFLBFDaFqNyDtWs+yQplVNoc75zZWP9eor0Uy DFimBgG94P1CfiEIEnn2ppLby0XWvu467NABgVpI1L5bPc5aIZa8V0/PrW/VsQ9v2QXi JJcqqltznd07gytmcoPcft5whbHm1xOCKB7FgKPYG+cBMEUVOaTKzD884n5hmtqwhrdJ Wd2HYQr9gEjhLjKRnTYnfwH41qDf9hx7IWppx8wk0/LZ7h1pvjon5DixZCyIMIvi/y3t 0RhqNlmCYw+zSBKmTJZ3nnfysiZu68i+l58ltzKt1CeokpmWQpFzPHqSd7SwgUQ94A5O cjbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=jxBjAT668SDmH+lQATFRqC65iZ++T3RpfV08hlDgOSY=; b=ERtrTowFOulSJ1/QfgxKfIZIqVXa8PznledPnNERSf8SaKWRPHtZZ6yH8nqPtbfSMk GTzYH51lYASaAp/Ky9heGyVY1msLxgMtTcd4iX4TCun8vWtD/XW8fabvoJpeJYt+nQoO +5mBibMKIl77YZKko6WGN/qE4HlzanzpKGNsvn4V9IVfIGdyKB0lTaBqvRfHfVhEPLS3 N+F7+MdCfrZ5e8rrs3AvjAD4omm7lOc+rsCEMerYF9moFHOy0mWQr9gPWAAxTiyCnG+q HYITC+7Mi3C4uvV1Wv++ztA0j1XdkBcUjvSAYcomSHPe508lkc8wL7TURKMs6Qd/1jMQ 1zRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUguQ5v4ZThvA4ijb+OpZWWaGWva0pfbIsCk1d2HfmFH3xCuszS5 Iufvi3fxzeJ1jMWXdd14NGQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCU0TLFkulSuXuPRIgRl//Kjn6Cj9DHU8NfEPA389ZwOiL0DOEH4d6VVhCDB5zeUI7RZMgK1Q== X-Received: by 10.99.42.11 with SMTP id q11mr4451519pgq.7.1506254632896; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 05:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (203-217-76-247.dyn.iinet.net.au. [203.217.76.247]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z26sm8156127pfa.49.2017.09.24.05.03.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 24 Sep 2017 05:03:52 -0700 (PDT) References: <83h8vudgfd.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3p6bioi.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 25.2.1 From: Alexis In-reply-to: Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 22:03:48 +1000 Message-ID: <877ewoxpzv.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Charles A. Roelli writes: > Yes, I believe that in my case too, the messages are (or would > be) > sent with the correct encoding. The encoding issue I mentioned > seems > to only apply to the saving of the mail buffer into the file > specified > in the FCC header. To me this sounds similar to #25645: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25645 Or is that entirely unrelated? Alexis. From unknown Wed Sep 10 17:01:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#28266: 25.2; RMAIL FCC coding issue Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 15:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28266 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Alexis Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 28266@debbugs.gnu.org, "Charles A. Roelli" Received: via spool by 28266-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28266.164295330517485 (code B ref 28266); Sun, 23 Jan 2022 15:56:01 +0000 Received: (at 28266) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2022 15:55:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40865 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBfCr-0004Xv-C4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:55:05 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39538) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBfCp-0004XI-Kr for 28266@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:55:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=21VDcKt7i22WHEQ8fJE4d/WI+AI16O9Bb8EbkBPXH7U=; b=O/hME2uF9uZAhd371zCsK6MfRf vhopFL6o29GwI4u1o4IJCqa/dMBatUVPnaZYEf1REwm5c7wM+pxhKSwNm+r403ysjFuETQBuAgeJW CPzGXKFN6R9TceM/EV6LawyXubYyFq8vjlAGdKPgJPSAc4UeldeYYNtwcRjm3OFfdwhk=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nBfCf-0006Hy-Um; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:54:56 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <83h8vudgfd.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3p6bioi.fsf@gnu.org> <877ewoxpzv.fsf@gmail.com> X-Now-Playing: Hector Zazou's _Reivax au Congo_: "Generique" Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:54:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <877ewoxpzv.fsf@gmail.com> (Alexis's message of "Sun, 24 Sep 2017 22:03:48 +1000") Message-ID: <87mtjm8n1v.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Alexis writes: > Charles A. Roelli writes: > >> Yes, I believe that in my case too, the messages are (or would be) >> sent with the correct encoding. The encoding issue I mentioned >> seems >> to [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Alexis writes: > Charles A. Roelli writes: > >> Yes, I believe that in my case too, the messages are (or would be) >> sent with the correct encoding. The encoding issue I mentioned >> seems >> to only apply to the saving of the mail buffer into the file >> specified >> in the FCC header. > > To me this sounds similar to #25645: > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25645 (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved at the time.) Looks quite similar. Charles, are you still seeing these problems in recent Emacs versions? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 23 10:55:11 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2022 15:55:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40868 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBfCw-0004YG-OP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:55:11 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39556) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBfCu-0004Xk-RW for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:55:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=E8OWdXhSZdh7h8VmMsrQB4g1cdIaxY0pyh2BUQ2DPd8=; b=coOTEt17cQnjFaGw4cubwwxT+U lxyFqKjqHgTqx6aCnfDtXqQeKJc9wTphAN5aPT8wV28RPRBntjhH0nKGuF+G21K5R6iQyRl44Wgjf lHD37jNHcWVPdcsHZxBHiZTRbMfQep9gHWKcFfFZul6iijEYSK54WSTjzFnlnkef02kQ=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nBfCm-0006I8-V4 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:55:03 +0100 Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:54:59 +0100 Message-Id: <87lez68n1o.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #28266 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 28266 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 28266 + moreinfo quit From unknown Wed Sep 10 17:01:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#28266: 25.2; RMAIL FCC coding issue Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 19:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28266 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Alexis Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 28266@debbugs.gnu.org, "Charles A. Roelli" Received: via spool by 28266-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28266.164538545830353 (code B ref 28266); Sun, 20 Feb 2022 19:31:01 +0000 Received: (at 28266) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2022 19:30:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33794 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nLrv7-0007tV-Pc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 14:30:58 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58668) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nLrv3-0007tC-7n for 28266@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 14:30:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=lvklRoqbx+WsWLQvFKFs6bPJ1OfMW65ts29h0gSfnDI=; b=ZJlsXrq2I6U0MtuC6sZ7EBnZ9Y w1H9iLoYXxDb28unfJ9wJdo4CYR3myO1j+CgwwT4LsPDZXsrzWXUGZVmLODIaEqhAjpqYELsjtT3o FJe0Ejx2gk8Z89i6TCENCYt1R9Y2mHUDuYkx5YYRJJAoeRenW2tqML/F7n2Ywt+Iunpk=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nLruu-0005Te-5z; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 20:30:46 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <83h8vudgfd.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3p6bioi.fsf@gnu.org> <877ewoxpzv.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtjm8n1v.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: DJ Screw's _All Work, No Play_: "DJ Screw Lil Keke South Side feat Lil Keke " Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 20:30:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87mtjm8n1v.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:54:52 +0100") Message-ID: <87y225mj31.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> To me this sounds similar to #25645: >> >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25645 > > (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved > at the time.) > > Looks q [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> To me this sounds similar to #25645: >> >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25645 > > (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved > at the time.) > > Looks quite similar. > > Charles, are you still seeing these problems in recent Emacs versions? There was no response in a month, and since 25645 was fixed, I'm going to assume that that fix also fixed this bug report, and I'm closing it. If this is still an issue in recent Emacs versions, please respond to the debbugs address and we'll reopen. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 20 14:31:02 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2022 19:31:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33798 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nLrvC-0007u3-1Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 14:31:02 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nLrvA-0007tM-4s for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 14:31:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ExYDpbPYj+2etcywoie+28VhN2uKu0yj6GcLkNwHtmY=; b=KZSpxkC48b5HTpx1e03u8vHNj6 yX7d7FB1DGHEKv3yGi/Tmc2kYmUYCLMgkFw65MDQmS1cSNLaA3TtqQrz20igPi4BLO4XtJkDhqVn4 HqwKq2IWyXlRSwrjqoT/972rBqDl6DFy7J4MwxAldJY/DajFJ2RMzsRVOplSF1eCrzkU=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nLrv2-0005Tu-64 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 20:30:54 +0100 Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 20:30:50 +0100 Message-Id: <87wnhpmj2t.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #28266 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 28266 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 28266 quit