GNU bug report logs - #28257
26.0.50; [PATCH] expose eldoc functions in a hook

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza <at> udel.edu>

Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 02:12:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch

Found in version 26.0.50

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #41 received at 28257 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>,
 Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: mvoteiza <at> udel.edu, larsi <at> gnus.org, 28257 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#28257: 26.0.50; [PATCH] expose eldoc functions in a hook
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:58:27 +0200
> From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, mvoteiza <at> udel.edu, 28257 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:57:04 -0500
> 
> > Can we please review Mark's patch some time soon?  TIA.
> 
> +  (if (> emacs-major-version 25)
> +      (add-hook 'eldoc-documentation-functions
> +                #'cfengine3-documentation-function nil t)
> 
> I think the 25 should be 26?  Or 27 if this is going to master (in which
> case the python.el hunk needs to be adjusted too).  Otherwise, the patch
> itself is fine in terms of coding details, as far as I can tell.

Thanks.

> I feel somewhat underqualified to decide whether or not the change in
> the semantics of eldoc-documentation-function is a good idea.

Thanks.  I'm even less qualified here, but the same thoughts crossed
my mind as well.

Stefan, any comments or ideas?  Who else might be relevant to discuss
these changes?




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 280 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.