GNU bug report logs - #28257
26.0.50; [PATCH] expose eldoc functions in a hook

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza <at> udel.edu>
Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net, npostavs <at> gmail.com, 28257 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#28257: 26.0.50; [PATCH] expose eldoc functions in a hook
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:05:09 +0200

> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 18:47:31 -0500
> From: Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza <at> udel.edu>
> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, 28257 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>  npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
> 
> On 26/06/19 at 10:03am, Mark Oteiza wrote:
> > On 24/06/19 at 06:51pm, Noam Postavsky wrote:
> > > Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
> > > 
> > > > Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza <at> udel.edu> writes:
> > > >
> > > >>> Could be a worthwhile tradeoff (especially
> > > >>>since there currently aren't any individual mode eldoc functions using
> > > >>>anything apart from :before-until, afaik); I'm on the fence about this.
> > > >>
> > > >> Not in emacs, at least.  In elpa, ggtags uses :after-until.  The only
> > > >> 3rd party packages--that I can think of right now--that implement eldoc
> > > >> functions just use setq-local (elpy and geiser).
> > > >
> > > > Noam, still on the fence?
> > > 
> > > I haven't really thought about this much, maybe bring it up on
> > > emacs-devel?
> > 
> > I happily rolled with this patch until some changes to eldoc broke it.
> > Will post a new patch when I get around to it.
> 
> New patch below.  Lightly tested, at first sight it seems to work
> (setting eldoc-documentation-function to eldoc-documentation-compose)

Lars, Noam, any comments?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.