GNU bug report logs - #28254
26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
To: Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza <at> udel.edu>
Cc: 28254 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
Subject: bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 07:25:07 +0200

Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza <at> udel.edu> writes:

> >> I didn't try writing it in the style of if-let*--perhaps if-let* could
> >> be extended and all three macros would learn (EXPR).
> >
> >Yes, I think it's best if all foo-let* macros interpret the varlist in
> >the same way.
>
> Alright, I'll look at it.

Isn't there a problem with EXPR being a symbol S, which already has a
different meaning (bind S to nil)?  Though, this seems barely useful to
me.  Anyway, introducing (EXPR) would thus be backward incompatible.


Michael.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.