GNU bug report logs - #28254
26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*

Previous Next

Full log

Message #17 received at 28254 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza <at> udel.edu>
To: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
Cc: 28254 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 00:14:24 -0400

On 01/09/17 at 11:05pm, npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza <at> udel.edu> writes:
>
>>  (and-let* ((x ...)
>>             (y ...)
>>             ((x > y)))
>>    ...)
>
>I assume you meant (> x y), unless you've managed to somehow squeeze an
>infix expression parser into that patch above ;)

Ah yeah, I wish!

>> I didn't try writing it in the style of if-let*--perhaps if-let* could
>> be extended and all three macros would learn (EXPR).
>
>Yes, I think it's best if all foo-let* macros interpret the varlist in
>the same way.

Alright, I'll look at it.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.