Subject: Re: bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*

From: Mark Oteiza <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:06:40 -0400

On 06/09/17 at 02:12pm, Michael Heerdegen wrote:
>Hi Mark,
>
>I just had a quick look.  One detail:
>
>> +  (cond
>> +   ((null elt) (list elt))
>> +   ((symbolp elt) (list elt elt))
>> +   ((nlistp elt) (list elt))
>> +   ((and (null (cdr elt))
>> +         (atom (car elt)))
>> +    (list (cl-gensym) (car elt)))
>> +   ((and (null (cdr elt))
>> +         (let ((form (car elt)))
>> +           (or (listp form) (atom form))))
>> +    (list (cl-gensym) (car elt)))
>              ^^^^^^^^^
>
>Wouldn't this mean we would have to (require 'cl-lib) (without
>`eval-when-compile') in subr-x?  I'm not sure if that would be
>acceptable.

Ah, yes.  That will just have to change to (make-symbol "x") or similar.
(It made debugging a lot easier)