GNU bug report logs - #28252
curl: Update replacement to 7.55.1.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#28252: closed (curl: Update replacement to 7.55.1.)
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 21:24:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2017 23:23:36 +0200
with message-id <8760d7z8rr.fsf <at> fastmail.com>
and subject line Re: [bug#28252] curl: Update replacement to 7.55.1.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #28252,
regarding curl: Update replacement to 7.55.1.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
28252: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=28252
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: curl: Update replacement to 7.55.1.
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 17:00:40 +0000

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Bugfix release, for us that means dropping an included patch
and the doc building is fixed.
-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org

[0001-gnu-curl-Update-replacement-to-7.55.1.patch (text/plain, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
Cc: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>, 28252-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#28252] curl: Update replacement to 7.55.1.
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 23:23:36 +0200

[Message part 7 (text/plain, inline)]

ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org> writes:

> Marius Bakke transcribed 0.9K bytes:
>> ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org> writes:
>> 
>> > Bugfix release, for us that means dropping an included patch
>> > and the doc building is fixed.
>> 
>> I'd prefer not to graft bugfix releases.  Grafts are pretty expensive in
>> terms of CPU, bandwidth and disk space and really only meant for
>> security fixes.  Is it safe to skip this release?
>
> If you'd like to carry around extra patches and substitute
> phases. It fixes the build of the currently released-as-broken-building
> previous release.

I prefer saving resources over cosmetics in this case.  We already have
the most important fixes from this release, and removing some lines of
code is not worth grafting up to 2k new derivations on every Guix system
out there IMO.  Global warming, and all that.

Closing.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.