GNU bug report logs - #28170
Add gnutls/dane + use it where its needed (gnurl, libmicrohttpd, gnunet)

Previous Next

Full log

Message #20 received at 28170 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: 28170 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
Subject: Re: [bug#28170] Add gnutls/dane + use it where its needed (gnurl,
 libmicrohttpd, gnunet)
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 14:03:41 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Christopher Baines transcribed 2.8K bytes:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 12:23:09 +0000
> ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org> wrote:
> 
> > Christopher Baines transcribed 2.1K bytes:
> > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:57:26 +0000
> > > ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > The dependency chain of GNUnet demands GnuTLS with DANE support.
> > > > You can use it without DANE, but there are certain parts which
> > > > will not work. DANE is recommended. (ports of FREEBSD uses
> > > > gnutls-dane for libmicrohttpd aswell for example).  
> > >   
> > > > From c9dedfd1a6f91d557006b00505a428be84102b1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > > > 2001 From: ng0 <ng0 <at> infotropique.org>
> > > > Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:28:51 +0000
> > > > Subject: [PATCH 1/4] gnu: gnutls: Add 'gnutls-dane'.
> > > > 
> > > > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (gnutls/dane): New variable.  
> > > 
> > > Hey, so I'm trying to do some reviewing.
> > > 
> > > What was your reasoning for creating a new gnutls/dane package,
> > > rather than adding unbound to the existing gnutls package?
> > > 
> > > I don't know much about GnuTLS, but it would be good to make it
> > > clear why this approach was taken, especially in the commit message
> > > and by the gnutls/dane package definition.  
> > 
> > Honestly, I did not want to touch the gnutls package for this.
> > I wanted to leave the option open to have gnutls without dane.
> > Sure, it's a useful feature. If you think I should apply it
> > directly to gnutls, tell me and I'll send a new patch.
> 
> I'm happy with that reason, if you could put that in the relevant
> commit message, or in a comment by the gnutls/dane package definition
> (or both), I'll check I can build all the changed packages, and push
> if they all build for me.


…and I need to send it again, there were some changes introduced which
broke this package it seems.
-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://krosos.org/dist/keys/
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.