GNU bug report logs -
#28166
25.2; Batch mode not perfectly noninteractive
Previous Next
Reported by: Андрей Парамонов <cmr.pent <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 19:54:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: notabug
Found in version 25.2
Done: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Андрей Парамонов <cmr.pent <at> gmail.com> writes:
> I thought that "noninteractive" means precisely:
> do not read from keyboard.
>
> However I'm not sure now. How do other (e.g Lisp) interpreters behave
> in similar circumstances?
sbcl has a --non-interactive option, it doesn't disable reading from
stdin. It basically just prevents the REPL from starting. I think this
is analogous to Emacs' --batch/--script option preventing the command
loop from starting.
~/tmp$ cat read-line.lisp
(read-line)
~/tmp$ sbcl --script read-line.lisp --non-interactive
[waiting for input here...]
~/tmp$ sbcl --help
Usage: sbcl [runtime-options] [toplevel-options] [user-options]
[...]
--disable-debugger Invoke sb-ext:disable-debugger.
--noprint Run a Read-Eval Loop without printing results.
--script [<filename>] Skip #! line, disable debugger, avoid verbosity.
--quit Exit with code 0 after option processing.
--non-interactive Sets both --quit and --disable-debugger.
[...]
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 312 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.