Subject: bug#28095: closed (Re: bug#28095: Graphviz test-suite probably requires ksh-93)

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:34:02 +0000

Your bug report

#28095: Graphviz test-suite probably requires ksh-93

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
28095: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=28095
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Re: bug#28095: Graphviz test-suite probably requires ksh-93
From: Greg Hogan <[email-masked]>
To: Simon Tournier <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 12:33:22 -0400
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 1:14 PM Simon Tournier <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2025 at 09:57, Greg Hogan <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > The good news is that graphviz tests no longer depend on ksh-93.
> > However, there are new library dependencies which complicate the
> > upgrade.
>
> Ok, cool!  Good news. :-)
>
> Well, if graphviz does not depend on ksh-93 anymore, maybe we could
> close this bug report.  WDYT?
>
> Cheers,
> simon

Am closing the issue. Looks like we can do a simple update of graphviz
and keep the same functionality without running tests or switching to
the cmake-build-system.

Subject: Graphviz test-suite probably requires ksh-93
From: ng0 <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:36:59 +0000
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

This bug is for myself as a reference and to close it once we have
fixed the comment in the graphviz package.

If you read https://github.com/ellson/graphviz/issues/1267 you'll
find out that ksh-93, which we don't have (yet) is the shell which
should be able to run the test suite of graphviz.

I'm currently debugging the build of ksh-93 and I also need to read
every header of it to check if we have one bit of AT&T proprietary
copyright in there. As fedora packages it, the chances are high that
it can just be used as-is, but we should check it nevertheless.
-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org