From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 11 17:01:19 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Aug 2017 21:01:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56060 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dgH3W-0001ti-Nx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:01:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59880) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dgH3T-0001tV-9x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:01:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dgH3M-0000MW-Kg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:01:09 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:46520) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dgH3M-0000MS-HS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:01:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dgH3K-0004Xy-Sd for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:01:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dgH3H-0000JX-R8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:01:06 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dgH3H-0000E5-I7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:01:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (port-92-200-72-107.dynamic.qsc.de [92.200.72.107]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1502485153519444.3369747593471; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 13:59:13 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: assert-node-has-guix should fail gracefully X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 22:59:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87shgxhlcx.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ZohoMailClient: External X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) I have a couple of servers where offloading doesn’t quite work for as yet unknown reasons. “guix offload test” crashes instead of telling me what’s wrong: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- root@berlin ~/maintenance# guix offload test guix offload: testing 3 build machines defined in '/etc/guix/machines.scm'... guix offload: '192.168.0.2' is running guile (GNU Guile) 2.2.2 guix offload: '192.168.0.3' is running guile (GNU Guile) 2.2.2 guix offload: '192.168.0.12' is running guile (GNU Guile) 2.2.2 guix offload: Guix is usable on '192.168.0.2' (test returned "/gnu/store/883yjkl46dxw9mzykykmbs0yzwyxm17z-test") guix offload: Guix is usable on '192.168.0.3' (test returned "/gnu/store/883yjkl46dxw9mzykykmbs0yzwyxm17z-test") Backtrace: 7 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/gkv8zl774h2qpa89mrf6d74fry3…") In guix/ui.scm: 1352:12 6 (run-guix-command _ . _) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 837:9 5 (catch _ _ # …) 837:9 4 (catch _ _ # …) In guix/scripts/offload.scm: 611:6 3 (check-machine-availability _ _) In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 656:11 2 (for-each # …) In guix/scripts/offload.scm: 543:2 1 (assert-node-has-guix _ "192.168.0.12") In ssh/dist/node.scm: 397:8 0 (node-eval # _) ssh/dist/node.scm:397:8: In procedure node-eval: ssh/dist/node.scm:397:8: Throw to key `node-repl-error' with args `("Evaluation failed" "scheme@(guile-user)> While compiling expression:\nERROR: no code for module (guix)" ())'. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- This error should be caught and the message be printed without the stack trace. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 09 17:41:43 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2017 21:41:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58764 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1fny-0001OW-TB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 17:41:43 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21112) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1fnw-0001OO-LH for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 17:41:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1507585292; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=Date:To:From:Subject; l=15; bh=Lwh3Hc7kv3SlMcx/0liV/1/AWyR0U6UhfHGQqBg/5xA=; b=PeRR2F60bbAVayMEFGSvCcpvTaFwBvnlPpZEmUuMLL8khy5lRvSiybk2b1OqRPxT o66wdS9094h8n/Y0a6XmodQkIRbkY5WouJUD7KRGvLzljtD0YGw8x4032RV4lXWGs4U 9gIjswfvbg25jH47ZoBYNeLQh7P9YORIggBN4JaM= Received: from localhost (port-92-200-49-16.dynamic.qsc.de [92.200.49.16]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1507585292548361.2503728689435; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 14:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 23:41:30 +0200 To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: control message for bug #28057 X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) owner 28057 ! From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 13 09:10:29 2018 Received: (at 28057-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2018 14:10:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54503 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eaMVx-0005wd-8g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 09:10:29 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:49492) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eaMVv-0005wW-LS for 28057-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 09:10:28 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D55109E0; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 15:10:27 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Ah_UgX7W__c; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 15:10:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11793109DE; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 15:10:24 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#28057: assert-node-has-guix should fail gracefully References: <87shgxhlcx.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 15:10:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87shgxhlcx.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Fri, 11 Aug 2017 22:59:10 +0200") Message-ID: <87efmtonn4.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 28057-done Cc: 28057-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > I have a couple of servers where offloading doesn=E2=80=99t quite work fo= r as > yet unknown reasons. =E2=80=9Cguix offload test=E2=80=9D crashes instead= of telling me > what=E2=80=99s wrong: > > root@berlin ~/maintenance# guix offload test > guix offload: testing 3 build machines defined in '/etc/guix/machines.scm= '... > guix offload: '192.168.0.2' is running guile (GNU Guile) 2.2.2 > guix offload: '192.168.0.3' is running guile (GNU Guile) 2.2.2 > guix offload: '192.168.0.12' is running guile (GNU Guile) 2.2.2 > guix offload: Guix is usable on '192.168.0.2' (test returned "/gnu/store/= 883yjkl46dxw9mzykykmbs0yzwyxm17z-test") > guix offload: Guix is usable on '192.168.0.3' (test returned "/gnu/store/= 883yjkl46dxw9mzykykmbs0yzwyxm17z-test") > Backtrace: > 7 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/gkv8zl774h2qpa89mrf6d74fry3=E2= =80=A6") > In guix/ui.scm: > 1352:12 6 (run-guix-command _ . _) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 837:9 5 (catch _ _ # =E2=80=A6) > 837:9 4 (catch _ _ # =E2=80=A6) > In guix/scripts/offload.scm: > 611:6 3 (check-machine-availability _ _) > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > 656:11 2 (for-each # =E2= =80=A6) > In guix/scripts/offload.scm: > 543:2 1 (assert-node-has-guix _ "192.168.0.12") > In ssh/dist/node.scm: > 397:8 0 (node-eval # _) > > ssh/dist/node.scm:397:8: In procedure node-eval: > ssh/dist/node.scm:397:8: Throw to key `node-repl-error' with args `("Eval= uation failed" "scheme@(guile-user)> While compiling expression:\nERROR: no= code for module (guix)" ())'. > > This error should be caught and the message be printed without the stack > trace. Fixed in 5a5e34e3588e863de0028523ada61041e78cf8c6, thanks. Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Jun 21 05:02:25 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator