From drew.adams@oracle.com Fri Mar 27 15:31:05 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 27 Mar 2009 22:31:06 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n2RMV3P1030523 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:31:04 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:56627 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LnKZq-00032G-G1 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:31:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LnKZo-000183-1T for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:31:02 -0400 Received: from acsinet11.oracle.com ([141.146.126.233]:20849) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LnKRj-0007IX-Sc for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:22:40 -0400 Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by acsinet11.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n2RMNXSg004360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:23:34 GMT Received: from acsmt707.oracle.com (acsmt707.oracle.com [141.146.40.85]) by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n2RMMaYr023007 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:22:37 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.161.92) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:22:30 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: Subject: 23.0.90; why is minibuffer-default-add-completions a command? Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:22:36 -0700 Message-ID: <009a01c9af2a$88d7a190$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcmvKogw+COFoVepSWCkXu9e4CXM+A== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Source-IP: acsmt707.oracle.com [141.146.40.85] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090208.49CD51A8.013D:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) emacs -Q Should `minibuffer-default-add-completions' really be an interactive function? I don't see where that feature is used anywhere. In GNU Emacs 23.0.90.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2009-02-01 on SOFT-MJASON Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4)' From juri@jurta.org Fri Mar 27 17:20:55 2009 Received: (at 2805) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Mar 2009 00:20:56 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,RCVD_IN_NIX1 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from relay01.kiev.sovam.com (relay01.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.200]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n2S0KqAx027939 for <2805@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:20:54 -0700 Received: from [83.170.232.243] (helo=smtp.svitonline.com) by relay01.kiev.sovam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LnMI7-0001nH-MU; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:20:51 +0200 From: Juri Linkov To: Drew Adams Cc: 2805@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#2805: 23.0.90; why is minibuffer-default-add-completions a command? Organization: JURTA References: <009a01c9af2a$88d7a190$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:16:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <009a01c9af2a$88d7a190$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:22:36 -0700") Message-ID: <87wsaa1pfx.fsf@jurta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanner-Signature: 04c94f097e8f9f394bef3a87cbd9ccf9 X-DrWeb-checked: yes > Should `minibuffer-default-add-completions' really be an > interactive function? I don't see where that feature is > used anywhere. Hmm, I don't remember why it was implemented as interactive. But now I see no reason why it should be interactive. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/ From monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Fri Mar 27 19:36:15 2009 Received: (at 2805) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Mar 2009 02:36:15 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,XIRONPORT autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.182]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n2S2aCvn031251 for <2805@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:36:13 -0700 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvgEALMpzUlFxIfy/2dsb2JhbACBUc5Fg3cGhHU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,436,1233550800"; d="scan'208";a="35798093" Received: from 69-196-135-242.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.135.242]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 27 Mar 2009 22:36:07 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0753F8682; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:36:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Juri Linkov Cc: 2805@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams Subject: Re: bug#2805: 23.0.90; why is minibuffer-default-add-completions a command? Message-ID: References: <009a01c9af2a$88d7a190$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <87wsaa1pfx.fsf@jurta.org> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:36:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wsaa1pfx.fsf@jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:16:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> Should `minibuffer-default-add-completions' really be an >> interactive function? I don't see where that feature is >> used anywhere. > Hmm, I don't remember why it was implemented as interactive. > But now I see no reason why it should be interactive. It may have been convenient when testing it. Please remove the (interactive) thingy. Stefan From juri@jurta.org Sat Mar 28 14:19:44 2009 Received: (at 2805-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Mar 2009 21:19:44 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from relay01.kiev.sovam.com (relay01.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.200]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n2SLJawg000464 for <2805-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:19:37 -0700 Received: from [83.170.232.243] (helo=smtp.svitonline.com) by relay01.kiev.sovam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LnfwF-0000i0-Bl; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:19:35 +0200 From: Juri Linkov To: Stefan Monnier Cc: 2805-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams Subject: Re: bug#2805: 23.0.90; why is minibuffer-default-add-completions a command? Organization: JURTA References: <009a01c9af2a$88d7a190$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <87wsaa1pfx.fsf@jurta.org> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:19:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:36:06 -0400") Message-ID: <873acxbb1u.fsf@jurta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanner-Signature: b36477657b07eb27dc67b07df918f397 X-DrWeb-checked: yes >>> Should `minibuffer-default-add-completions' really be an >>> interactive function? I don't see where that feature is >>> used anywhere. > >> Hmm, I don't remember why it was implemented as interactive. >> But now I see no reason why it should be interactive. > > It may have been convenient when testing it. Please remove the > (interactive) thingy. Done. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/ From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:11:29 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: $requester Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # A New Hope # A log time ago, in a galaxy far, far away # something happened. # # Magically this resulted in the following # action being taken, but this fake control # message doesn't tell you why it happened # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator