GNU bug report logs - #2805
23.0.90; why is minibuffer-default-add-completions a command?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:35:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 2805 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 2805 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>:
bug#2805; Package emacs. (Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:35:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>. (Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:35:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: <emacs-pretest-bug <at> gnu.org>
Subject: 23.0.90; why is minibuffer-default-add-completions a command?
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:22:36 -0700

emacs -Q
 
Should `minibuffer-default-add-completions' really be an
interactive function? I don't see where that feature is
used anywhere.
 

In GNU Emacs 23.0.90.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2009-02-01 on SOFT-MJASON
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4)'
Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>:
bug#2805; Package emacs. (Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:30:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>. (Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:30:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 2805 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 2805 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#2805: 23.0.90; why is minibuffer-default-add-completions a command?
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:16:11 +0200

> Should `minibuffer-default-add-completions' really be an
> interactive function? I don't see where that feature is
> used anywhere.

Hmm, I don't remember why it was implemented as interactive.
But now I see no reason why it should be interactive.

-- 
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>:
bug#2805; Package emacs. (Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:45:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>. (Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:45:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 2805 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org>
Cc: 2805 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Subject: Re: bug#2805: 23.0.90; why is minibuffer-default-add-completions a command?
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:36:06 -0400

>> Should `minibuffer-default-add-completions' really be an
>> interactive function? I don't see where that feature is
>> used anywhere.

> Hmm, I don't remember why it was implemented as interactive.
> But now I see no reason why it should be interactive.

It may have been convenient when testing it.  Please remove the
(interactive) thingy.


        Stefan
Reply sent to Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:25:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:25:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 2805-done <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 2805-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Subject: Re: bug#2805: 23.0.90; why is minibuffer-default-add-completions a command?
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:19:09 +0200

>>> Should `minibuffer-default-add-completions' really be an
>>> interactive function? I don't see where that feature is
>>> used anywhere.
>
>> Hmm, I don't remember why it was implemented as interactive.
>> But now I see no reason why it should be interactive.
>
> It may have been convenient when testing it.  Please remove the
> (interactive) thingy.

Done.

-- 
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:24:07 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 16 years and 58 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.