GNU bug report logs - #28004
Chromium

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> n0.is>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: 28004 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ng0 <ng0 <at> n0.is>
Subject: [bug#28004] Chromium
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 09:38:19 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Marius Bakke transcribed 2.3K bytes:
> ng0 <ng0 <at> n0.is> writes:
> 
> > Marius Bakke transcribed 39K bytes:
> >
> >> Testing and feedback welcome!
> >> 
> >> Currently there are two "important" (blocking?) TODOs left:
> >> 
> >> * Move the 'delete-bundled-software' phase to a source snippet.
> >>   Repacking the ~500MiB compressed tarball is *really* expensive.  It
> >>   should also aid the licensing situation.
> >> * Delete the two default entries from the "most used" list on the New
> >>   Tab page.  The first run will download thumbnails for these sites,
> >>   leaking data.  One of them also leads to the disabled-by-default
> >>   store, promoting non-free software.
> >> 
> >> I'm optimistic that fixing the second item will make the browser not
> >> leak *any* data at launch with the default configuration.  Which leads
> >> to a third item: writing a system test that verifies that launching
> >> Chromium does indeed not initiate any network traffic.
> >> 
> >> Anyway, here is the latest patch:
> >> 
> >
> >> From f813b2d7ec0728a906720fa74bf9f442af6ab10d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
> >> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:25:05 +0100
> >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add chromium.
> >> 
> >> * gnu/packages/chromium.scm: New file.
> >> * gnu/local.mk: Record it.
> >
> > I think you forgot a package:
> >
> > gnu/packages/chromium.scm:664:5: icu4c-59.1: unbound variable
> 
> Indeed.  This can now be changed to use the regular "icu4c" package.

Okay, will change. Thanks!

> Tangentially, these kinds of problems are typical with new Chromium
> releases.  In 63 or later, system harfbuzz had to be disabled.  If we
> are going to carry this package, changes like these *will* be normal.
>
> Upstream only tests their releases with Clang, and with the bundled
> versions of packages, regardless of the unbundling script.  Not great.

Yeah. I've been there, and read the frustration of other packagers
when I worked on getting a basic skeleton of chromium + dependencies
ready one(?) year ago.
-- 
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://c.n0.is/ng0_pubkeys/tree/keys
  WWW: https://n0.is/a/  ::  https://ea.n0.is

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.