GNU bug report logs - #28004
Chromium

Previous Next

Full log

Message #275 received at 28004 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org>
Cc: guix-devel <at> gnu.org, 28004 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Chromium channel
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 15:28:23 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org> writes:

> Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org> writes:
>
>> Hello :-)
>>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org> skribis:
>>>
>>>> So the question is: can we push the Chromium package?  I've read it's
>>>> almost ready[2].  It's probably far better than everything we have,
>>>> despite not being totally 'finished'.  Maybe we can add what's left to
>>>> do as a TODO and fix the package later?
>>>
>>> As long as the freedom issues and phone-home issues are addressed, which
>>> appears to be the case, I’m all for it.
>>>
>>> Marius?
>>
>> Marius, what is the status, can we merge it?
>
> Ping

Hello, sorry for the delay.

I've set up a channel for Chromium here:

https://gitlab.com/mbakke/guix-chromium

Chromium has been updated for version 69 as well.

I don't think we can merge as-is due to the tight Web Store integration
(even if it's disabled), but I will start work on packaging the full
"Ungoogled-Chromium" next:

https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium

I'll bump this thread once it is ready for testing.  Developments will
happen in the Gitlab repository.  Pull requests welcome!  :-)

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.