GNU bug report logs - #28004
Chromium

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> n0.is>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>, 28004 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ng0 <ng0 <at> n0.is>
Subject: [bug#28004] Chromium
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:52:25 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Marius Bakke transcribed 1.4K bytes:
> ng0 <ng0 <at> n0.is> writes:
> 
> > I think we found it to be good enough to be included in master, or did I miss anything?
> >
> > Would be nice if I could drop my local patch (and building). The team around Taler seems
> > to be interested in it as well as far as I can remember our chats in Leipzig.
> 
> Reading up on GNU Taler, Chromium seems like a poor choice for an
> anonymous payment system.  Why not GNU IceCat?  I don't see Chromium
> becoming stable enough for guaranteed privacy any time soon.  And a full
> fork would require a large maintenance team.

Why: Ask Taler directly, I'm not involved with them.
And on for what: It is just for the Browser extension. No one is forking
Chromium again.

> Unfortunately I got busy after the latest update, and haven't had time
> to work on 65 yet.  I will send an update once I get around to it, and
> also try some other Inox patches and see if they help with the "first
> launch" issue -- hopefully within a week or two.

Cool, thanks! And thanks for your continued work on this. I'll definitely
try to help out once it is in master.
-- 
A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
https://n0.is

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.