GNU bug report logs - #27961
[PATCH 0/5] Update python-orator, Move to databases.scm

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft <at> uq.edu.au>

Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 02:09:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft <at> uq.edu.au>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft <at> uq.edu.au>
Subject: bug#27961: closed (Re: [bug#27961] [PATCH 5/5] gnu:
 python-orator: Move to (gnu packages databases).)
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 01:31:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#27961: [PATCH 0/5] Update python-orator, Move to databases.scm

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 27961 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
27961: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27961
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft <at> uq.edu.au>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>, Ben Woodcroft <donttrustben <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 27961-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#27961] [PATCH 5/5] gnu: python-orator: Move to (gnu packages
 databases).
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 11:30:04 +1000
On 17/08/17 00:36, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> [..]
>
> Okay to push with this change!
Thanks for these helpful reviews Ricardo. I've now pushed this series 
ending in da1f7a9e16d7debd59b8e1d39291cdf4cc4f6ea0.

ben

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft <at> uq.edu.au>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Update python-orator, Move to databases.scm
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 12:07:44 +1000
Hi,

This patch set updates python-orator to 0.9.7, adding some new packages.

To reduce the number of packages in python.scm, orator is moved to 
databases.scm, and some new packages are put in time.scm - is that sensible?

TIA for the review.

ben




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 254 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.