GNU bug report logs - #27955
[cuirass] doc: Clarify the relationship of "repo_name" and "name".

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Subject: bug#27955: closed (Re: [bug#27955] [cuirass] doc: Clarify the
 relationship of "repo_name" and "name".)
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 03:21:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#27955: [cuirass] doc: Clarify the relationship of "repo_name" and "name".

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 27955 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
27955: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27955
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: 27955-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#27955] [cuirass] doc: Clarify the relationship of
 "repo_name" and "name".
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 23:20:49 -0400

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:14:01PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:07:56AM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Sep 2017 15:09:48 +0200
> > ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> > 
> > > Hey Leo,
> > > 
> > > Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skribis:
> > > 
> > > > I *think* this patch is correct. I'm currently trying to get started
> > > > with Cuirass and this tripped me up.
> > > >
> > > > * doc/cuirass.texi (Specifications): Mention "name".  
> > > 
> > > I think you’re right, please push!
> > 
> > Bump. Is this still ready to be merged, as I don't think it has been
> > merged yet?
> 
> Sure, but I can't figure out how to push to this repo. What is the push
> URL?

Never mind, I figure it out and pushed!

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [cuirass] doc: Clarify the relationship of "repo_name" and "name".
Date: Fri,  4 Aug 2017 11:39:31 -0400

I *think* this patch is correct. I'm currently trying to get started
with Cuirass and this tripped me up.

* doc/cuirass.texi (Specifications): Mention "name".
---
 doc/cuirass.texi | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/cuirass.texi b/doc/cuirass.texi
index 2899ffb..76f1ecc 100644
--- a/doc/cuirass.texi
+++ b/doc/cuirass.texi
@@ -216,7 +216,9 @@ Entries in this table must have values for the following text fields:
 @table @code
 @item repo_name
 This field holds the name of the repository.  This field is also the
-primary key of this table.
+primary key of this table.  Although this field is called
+@code{repo_name} in the database, it's called @code{name} in the
+specification itself.
 
 @item url
 The URL of the repository.
-- 
2.13.3

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.