GNU bug report logs - #27943
tar complains about too-long names (guix release)

Previous Next

Full log

Message #28 received at 27943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 27943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Subject: Re: bug#27943: tar complains about too-long names (guix release)
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 13:20:59 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 05:50:01PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Maybe ‘lint-hidden-vulnerabilities’ or ‘hidden-vulnerabilities’, or
> ‘ignored-vulnerabilities’, or…?  What’s you preference?  :-)

I like 'lint-hidden-vulnerabilities' because it communicates that we are
"hiding" a vulnerability somehow and that it's related to the linter.

Maybe even 'lint-hidden-cve', since it's really about the CVE system and
not so much about vulnerabilities as vulnerabilities.

> Would you be OK with a more appropriate name and the understanding that
> it’s there to address rare cases like this one?

Yes, definitely!

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.