GNU bug report logs - #27940
Recursively delete dir34? (yes, no, all, quit)

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>

Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 00:38:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Done: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 27940 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, jidanni <at> jidanni.org, Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#27940: Recursively delete dir34? (yes, no, all, quit)
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 01:34:17 +0900 (JST)

On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Drew Adams wrote:

>>> Is it a good idea to mix `yes-or-no-p'-style (minibuffer) input,
>>> such as `yes' and `no', with `read-char'-style input, such as `!'
>>> and `q'?  I don't think so, a priori.  Especially for `!', which
>>> has worse repercussions in case of a mistake than does `y'.  No?
>> Agreed.  If you see my first answer i was reluctant to allow the dangerous
>> operation.
>> I will use "all" and "quit" instead of "!", "q".
>>
>> * Question:
>> Do we need to show the help after this change?
>
> I would say yes, for the help.  Think of `yes-or-no-p'.
> If you type `foo' to `yes-or-no-p' it helps you.  Here
> we should offer more help, explaining the possibilities.
I see.  Thank you for the explanation!




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 218 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.