GNU bug report logs - #27922
[PATCH] gnu: python-numpy: Update to 1.12.1.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 19:50:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be>
Cc: 27922 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>, Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Subject: [bug#27922] [PATCH] gnu: python-numpy: Update to 1.12.1.
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 13:48:45 +0200
Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be> skribis:

> ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skribis:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 10:12:21PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>>>> Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> writes:
>>>> 
>>>> > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-numpy, python2-numpy): Update to 1.12.1.
>>>> 
>>>> LGTM ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> > [source]: Download the "real" release tarball instead of the snapshot.
>>>> 
>>>> NumPy provides a PGP signature with the zipball on PyPi:
>>>> 
>>>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/numpy
>>>
>>> Good catch!
>>>
>>>> Is there a reason to prefer the GitHub release tarball?
>>>
>>> Not that I know of. I only chose this tarball because I saw it on the GitHub
>>> page. I'll try switching to PyPi.
>>
>> Leo, I think this fell through the cracks!  :-)
>>
>> Ludo'.
>
> I can push a modified patch (with the pypi source) if it's ok.  Is there
> any reason we would not update to version 1.13.1 rightaway?

If the dependents of NumPy build fine, I see no reason not to upgrade to
1.13.1.

Thanks for picking this up!

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 295 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.