GNU bug report logs -
#27898
Clean-up of package phases
Previous Next
Reported by: Kei Kebreau <kei <at> openmailbox.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 07:20:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Kei Kebreau <kkebreau <at> posteo.net> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> The patches are in working order. The first patch would cause 1200
>>> rebuilds, but the second would only cause 128 rebuilds. Should I work on
>>> splitting up the first patch into pieces that Hydra can handle under its
>>> current load?
>>
>> I'm not actually sure what's best here. It may be easiest to just throw
>> them both at 'staging' and accept the (hopefully few) merge conflicts.
>>
>> Ludo, any preference?
>
> The one that causes 128 rebuilds could go to ‘master’ (which is a good
> thing: we won’t have conflicts with this part of the changes.)
I've committed the 128-rebuild patch to the master branch.
>
> The rest could go to ‘staging’ I suppose.
>
>> If we're going staging, let's try to coordinate it so that we can start
>> it shortly after adding them. Maybe midnight tomorrow or Saturday UTC?
>> I have a few other updates in my queue that haven't been pushed yet.
>
> Sounds reasonable to me. I’ll let you coordinate. :-)
>
Marius, send me an email when you're ready!
> Thanks for taking care of this!
>
:-)
> Ludo’.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 277 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.