GNU bug report logs - #27898
Clean-up of package phases

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Kei Kebreau <kei <at> openmailbox.org>

Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 07:20:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: Kei Kebreau <kkebreau <at> posteo.net>, 27898 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#27898] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Use 'modify-phases' syntax.
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 10:17:54 +0200
Hello,

Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> skribis:

> Kei Kebreau <kkebreau <at> posteo.net> writes:

[...]

>> The patches are in working order. The first patch would cause 1200
>> rebuilds, but the second would only cause 128 rebuilds. Should I work on
>> splitting up the first patch into pieces that Hydra can handle under its
>> current load?
>
> I'm not actually sure what's best here.  It may be easiest to just throw
> them both at 'staging' and accept the (hopefully few) merge conflicts.
>
> Ludo, any preference?

The one that causes 128 rebuilds could go to ‘master’ (which is a good
thing: we won’t have conflicts with this part of the changes.)

The rest could go to ‘staging’ I suppose.

> If we're going staging, let's try to coordinate it so that we can start
> it shortly after adding them.  Maybe midnight tomorrow or Saturday UTC?
> I have a few other updates in my queue that haven't been pushed yet.

Sounds reasonable to me.  I’ll let you coordinate.  :-)

Thanks for taking care of this!

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 278 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.