GNU bug report logs - #27884
parted reports the partition is not optimally aligned, even though it's 1MiB-aligned

Previous Next

Package: parted;

Reported by: Alicia Boya García <ntrrgc <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:06:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Phil Susi <psusi <at> ubuntu.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Phil Susi <psusi <at> ubuntu.com>
To: Alicia Boya García <ntrrgc <at> gmail.com>, 27884 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#27884: parted reports the partition is not optimally aligned,  even though it's 1MiB-aligned
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 08:55:40 -0400
On 7/30/2017 6:46 PM, Alicia Boya García wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Is there any explanation to this GNU parted output?
> 
> GNU Parted 3.2
> Using /dev/sde
> Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
> (parted) unit B                                                          
> (parted) p                                                               
> Model: Seagate M3 Portable (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sde: 4000787029504B
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
> Partition Table: gpt
> Disk Flags:
> 
> Number  Start     End             Size            File system  Name  Flags
>  1      1048576B  4000786153471B  4000785104896B  ext4
> 
> (parted) align-check                                                     
> alignment type(min/opt)  [optimal]/minimal?                              
> Partition number? 1                                                      
> 1 not aligned
> 
> Why does it say it's not aligned? Both the the start and the end are
> 1MB-aligned (and therefore trivially 4096B-aligned and 512B-aligned), am
> I right?

Maybe your drive is advertising a different optimal alignment.  What
does /sys/block/sde/queue/optimal_io_size say?





This bug report was last modified 7 years and 246 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.