GNU bug report logs - #27674
26.0.50; cl-progv: strange scoping due to implementation

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>

Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 21:54:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug, wontfix

Found in version 26.0.50

Done: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
Cc: 27674 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#27674: 26.0.50; cl-progv: strange scoping due to implementation
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 20:21:39 -0400
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de> writes:

> The way `cl-progv' is implemented, we have some strange effects
> happening to closures in the body.  For example, with lexical-binding
> on,
>
> (let ((x 0))
>   (cl-progv (list 'x) (list 1)
>     (funcall (lambda () x))))
>
> yields 0, and
>
> (cl-progv (list 'x) (list 1)
>   (funcall (lambda () x)))
>
> yields 1.  That isn't consistent (FWIW I would expect `1' in both
> cases).

IMO, this is a bug in your program, this yields 1:

(progn
  (defvar x)
  (let ((x 0))
    (cl-progv (list 'x) (list 1)
      (funcall (lambda () x)))))

Note that your second expression gives a compile warning (it's also
missing a defvar, though it happens to give the result you expect even
without that):

27674.el:10:25:Warning: reference to free variable ‘x’




This bug report was last modified 8 years and 1 day ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.